COVID-19 adaptations to a training and support programme to improve primary care response to domestic abuse: a mixed methods rapid study

被引:0
|
作者
Downes, Lucy [1 ]
Barbosa, Estela Capelas [2 ]
机构
[1] IRISi, 10 Pk St, Bristol BS1 5HX, England
[2] Univ Bristol, Bristol Med Sch, Canynge Hall, Bristol BS8 2PN, England
来源
BMC PRIMARY CARE | 2024年 / 25卷 / 01期
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会; 英国医学研究理事会; 英国经济与社会研究理事会; 英国自然环境研究理事会;
关键词
Domestic abuse; Primary care; Training; Advocacy support; Mixed methods; COVID-19; INTIMATE PARTNER VIOLENCE; HEALTH; EXPERIENCES; WOMEN;
D O I
10.1186/s12875-023-02203-5
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
BackgroundIncreased incidence and/or reporting of domestic abuse (DA) accompanied the COVID-19 pandemic. National lockdowns and enforced social isolation necessitated new ways of supporting victims of DA remotely. Identification and Referral to Improve Safety (IRIS) is a programme to improve the response to domestic abuse in general practice, providing training for general practice teams and support for patients affected by DA, which has previously been proven effective and cost-effective [1-3]. The COVID-19 pandemic required the adaptation of the programme to online training and remote support.MethodsThis study is mixed methods rapid research, which aimed to gather evidence around the relevance, desirability and acceptability of IRIS operating remotely. Quantitative IRIS referral data were triangulated with data from four surveys and 15 interviews. Participants were local IRIS teams, IRIS-trained clinicians, and victim-survivors supported by IRIS services. The study was designed using the Lean Impact approach, allowing quick evaluation of innovation and the impact of social interventions. We carried out a framework analysis of the interviews, which is a qualitative methodology widely used in policy and applied research that enables research teams to move from descriptive accounts to a conceptual explanation of findings [4, 5].ResultsWe found that the adaptation to online training and support of IRIS was acceptable and desirable. Most clinicians felt confident addressing DA over the phone and online, although most were more confident face-to-face. While referrals to IRIS services initially declined in March 2020, numbers of referrals increased to pre-pandemic levels by July 2020. Patients felt well supported remotely, although patients who had previously experienced face-to-face support preferred it. Technology was the most frequently mentioned barrier to the change from face-to-face training and support to online training and remote support.ConclusionsThis study contributes to practice by asserting the desirability and acceptability of training clinicians to be able to identify, ask about DA and refer to the IRIS programme during telephone/online consultations. This is of relevance to health and public health commissioners when making commissioning decisions to improve the general practice response to domestic abuse.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] COVID-19 adaptations to a training and support programme to improve primary care response to domestic abuse: a mixed methods rapid study
    Lucy Downes
    Estela Capelas Barbosa
    BMC Primary Care, 25
  • [2] PRimary care rEsponse to domestic violence and abuse in the COvid-19 panDEmic (PRECODE): protocol of a rapid mixed-methods study in the UK
    Szilassy, Eszter
    Barbosa, Estela Capelas
    Dixon, Sharon
    Feder, Gene
    Griffiths, Chris
    Johnson, Medina
    De Simoni, Anna
    Wileman, Vari
    Panovska-Griffiths, Jasmina
    Dowrick, Anna
    BMC FAMILY PRACTICE, 2021, 22 (01)
  • [3] PRimary care rEsponse to domestic violence and abuse in the COvid-19 panDEmic (PRECODE): protocol of a rapid mixed-methods study in the UK
    Eszter Szilassy
    Estela Capelas Barbosa
    Sharon Dixon
    Gene Feder
    Chris Griffiths
    Medina Johnson
    Anna De Simoni
    Vari Wileman
    Jasmina Panovska-Griffiths
    Anna Dowrick
    BMC Family Practice, 22
  • [4] Identifying and responding to domestic abuse in cancer care: A mixed methods service evaluation of a training and support intervention
    Dheensa, Sandi
    Hendy, Ruth
    Finn, Linda
    Goodchild, Marion
    Barbosa, Estela Capelas
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY NURSING, 2025, 74
  • [5] The primary care COVID-19 integrated pathway: a rapid response to health and social impacts of COVID-19
    Fariba Aghajafari
    Brian Hansen
    Kerry McBrien
    Myles Leslie
    Alexandra Chiew
    Rick Ward
    Bing Li
    Jia Hu
    BMC Primary Care, 23
  • [6] The primary care COVID-19 integrated pathway: a rapid response to health and social impacts of COVID-19
    Aghajafari, Fariba
    Hansen, Brian
    McBrien, Kerry
    Leslie, Myles
    Chiew, Alexandra
    Ward, Rick
    Li, Bing
    Hu, Jia
    BMC PRIMARY CARE, 2022, 23 (01):
  • [7] Occupational stress in primary care workers during the COVID-19 pandemic: mixed methods study
    Tamborini, Marcilene Marques de Freitas
    Centenaro, Alexa Pupiara Flores Coelho
    Souto, Eliane Nogueira de Souza
    Andres, Alana Thais Gisch
    Stumm, Eniva Miladi Fernandes
    Colet, Christiane de Fatima
    REVISTA LATINO-AMERICANA DE ENFERMAGEM, 2023, 31
  • [8] Experiencing COVID-19, home isolation and primary health care: A mixed-methods study
    Parisi, Sandra
    Lehner, Nina
    Schrader, Hanna
    Kierer, Leonard
    Fleischer, Anna
    Miljukov, Olga
    Borgulya, Gabor
    Rueter, Gernot
    Viniol, Annika
    Gagyor, Ildiko
    FRONTIERS IN PUBLIC HEALTH, 2023, 10
  • [9] The kindness COVID-19 toolkit: a mixed-methods evaluation of a programme designed by doctors in training for doctors in training
    Ward, Madeleine C.
    Crinall, Karen
    McDonald, Rebecca
    Crinall, William
    Aridas, James
    Leung, Cheryl
    Quittner, Danielle
    Hodges, Ryan J.
    Rolnik, Daniel L.
    BMJ OPEN, 2022, 12 (11):
  • [10] Coping strategies for COVID-19 primary care: a mixed method study
    Barbieri, Janaina
    Recalcati, Andrielli da Silveira
    Ramos, Adriana Roese
    dos Santos, Adriano Maia
    de Magalhaes, Ana Maria Muller
    Riquinho, Deise Lisboa
    CIENCIA & SAUDE COLETIVA, 2023, 28 (09): : 2613 - 2623