Estimation of Late Postmortem Interval: Where Do We Stand? A Literature Review

被引:15
|
作者
Franceschetti, Lorenzo [1 ]
Amadasi, Alberto [2 ]
Bugelli, Valentina [3 ]
Bolsi, Giulia [1 ]
Tsokos, Michael [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Milan, Ist Med Legale, Dipartimento Sci Biomed Salute, Via Luigi Mangiagalli 37, I-20133 Milan, Italy
[2] Charite Univ med Berlin, Inst Legal Med & Forens Sci, Turmstr 21 Haus M, D-10559 Berlin, Germany
[3] Dept Legal Med, South East Tuscany Local Hlth Unit, Via Cimabue 109, I-58100 Grosseto, Italy
来源
BIOLOGY-BASEL | 2023年 / 12卷 / 06期
关键词
postmortem interval estimation; skeletal remains; advanced decomposition; multidisciplinary assessment; late postmortem interval; best practices; HUMAN SKELETAL REMAINS; CITRATE CONTENT; INFRARED-SPECTROSCOPY; SKELETONIZED REMAINS; RADIOCARBON ANALYSIS; INSECT COLONIZATION; RAMAN-SPECTROSCOPY; FTIR SPECTROSCOPY; BONE; DECOMPOSITION;
D O I
10.3390/biology12060783
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Simple Summary The estimation of the time of death, or post-mortem interval, is a crucial aspect of forensic death-related investigations. However, accurate estimation can be challenging, especially when dealing with cadavers in advanced stages of decomposition and skeletal remains. The decomposition process and taphonomic changes can affect the body's external appearance, making it difficult to determine even an approximate time since death. Additionally, factors such as temperature, humidity, and the presence of insects and scavengers can accelerate or slow down the decomposition process, further complicating the estimation of postmortem interval. Forensic practitioners rely on various methods, such as the examination of post-mortem changes in the body, the analysis of bone structures, and instrumental and molecular approaches. Despite these efforts and new methodologies, accurate estimation of PMI remains a complex task. The present review illustrates the main methods that can be used in such distinctive cases, seeking to provide forensic experts with useful elements to understand which approach best fits the case they have to evaluate in their ordinary practice. Estimating time since death can be challenging for forensic experts, and is one of the most challenging activities concerning the forensic world. Various methods have been assessed to calculate the postmortem interval on dead bodies in different stages of decomposition and are currently widely used. Nowadays, the only well-recognized dating technique is carbon-14 radioisotope measurement, whereas other methods have been tested throughout the years involving different disciplines with different and sometimes not univocal results. Today, there is no precise and secure method to precisely determine time since death, and late postmortem interval estimation remains one of the most debated topics in forensic pathology. Many proposed methods have shown promising results, and it is desirable that with further studies some of them might become acknowledged techniques to resolve such a difficult and important challenge. The present review aims at presenting studies about the different techniques that have been tested in order to find a valuable method for estimating time since death for skeletal remains. By providing a comprehensive overview, the purpose of this work is to offer readers new perspectives on postmortem interval estimation and to improve current practice in the management of skeletal remains and decomposed bodies.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Early and Late Infections in Newborns: Where Do We Stand? A Review
    Cortese, Francesca
    Scicchitano, Pietro
    Gesualdo, Michele
    Filaninno, Antonella
    De Giorgi, Elsa
    Schettini, Federico
    Laforgia, Nicola
    Ciccone, Marco Matteo
    PEDIATRICS AND NEONATOLOGY, 2016, 57 (04): : 265 - 273
  • [2] Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma - Where Do We Stand Today? Literature Review
    Savin, Catalin
    Tarca, Luiza
    Eftimie, Mihai
    Balescu, Irina
    Petrea, Sorin
    Diaconu, Camelia
    Gaspar, Bogdan
    Pop, Lucian
    Varlas, Valentin
    Hasegan, Adrian
    Martac, Cristina
    Bolca, Ciprian
    Stroescu, Cezar
    Stoian, Marilena
    Gorecki, Gabriel Petre
    Bacalbasa, Nicolae
    CHIRURGIA, 2023, 118 (06) : 553 - 567
  • [3] Mesopancreas in Pancreatic Cancer: Where do We Stand – Review of Literature
    Chowdappa R.
    Challa V.R.
    Indian Journal of Surgical Oncology, 2015, 6 (1) : 69 - 74
  • [4] Microneedling: Where do we stand now? A systematic review of the literature
    Ramaut, Lisa
    Hoeksema, Henk
    Pirayesh, Ali
    Stillaert, Filip
    Monstrey, Stan
    JOURNAL OF PLASTIC RECONSTRUCTIVE AND AESTHETIC SURGERY, 2018, 71 (01): : 1 - 14
  • [5] LAPAROSCOPIC INTERVAL DEBULKING SURGERY: WHERE DO WE STAND AND WHERE DO WE NEED TO GO?
    Rosati, Andrea
    Guidi, Giacomo
    De Palma, Antonella
    Zampolini, Alice
    Boccia, Serena
    Conte, Carmine
    Costantini, Barbara
    Scambia, Giovanni
    Fagotti, Anna
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2023, 33 : A51 - A51
  • [6] Postmortem fetal magnetic resonance imaging: where do we stand?
    Aurélie D’Hondt
    Marie Cassart
    Raymond De Maubeuge
    Gustavo Soto Ares
    Jacques Rommens
    E. Fred Avni
    Insights into Imaging, 2018, 9 : 591 - 598
  • [7] Postmortem fetal magnetic resonance imaging: where do we stand?
    D'Hondt, Aurelie
    Cassart, Marie
    De Maubeuge, Raymond
    Ares, Gustavo Soto
    Rommens, Jacques
    Avni, E. Fred
    INSIGHTS INTO IMAGING, 2018, 9 (04): : 591 - 598
  • [8] ERP Systems and Organizational Learning: Where do we Stand? A Literature Review
    Myreteg, Gunilla
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 8TH EUROPEAN CONFERENCE ON IS MANAGEMENT AND EVALUATION (ECIME 2014), 2014, : 155 - 162
  • [9] Exosomes in breast cancer management: Where do we stand? A literature review
    Alexandra, Triantafyllou
    Maria, Gazouli
    Charalampos, Theodoropoulos
    Eleni, Zografos
    George, Zografos C.
    Nikolaos, Michalopoulos, V
    BIOLOGY OF THE CELL, 2022, 114 (04) : 109 - 122
  • [10] Late Sodium Current of the Heart: Where Do We Stand and Where Are We Going?
    Horvath, Balazs
    Szentandrassy, Norbert
    Almassy, Janos
    Dienes, Csaba
    Kovacs, Zsigmond Mate
    Nanasi, Peter P.
    Banyasz, Tamas
    PHARMACEUTICALS, 2022, 15 (02)