Reply to the 'Comment on "Perturbation theory of scattering for grazing-incidence fast-atom diffraction"' by G. A. Bocan, H. Breiss, S. Szilasi, A. Momeni, E. M. S. Casagrande, E. A. Sanchez, M. S. Gravielle and H. Khemliche, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2023, <bold>25</bold>, DOI: 10.1039/D3CP02486E

被引：1
|
作者：
Allison, W. [1 ]
Miret-Artes, S. [2 ]
Pollak, E. [3 ]
机构：
[1] SMF Cavendish Lab, JJ Thomson Ave, Cambridge, England
[2] CSIC, Inst Fis Fundamental, Serrano 123, Madrid 28006, Spain
[3] Weizmann Inst Sci, Chem & Biol Phys Dept, IL-76100 Rehovot, Israel
来源：
PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY CHEMICAL PHYSICS | 2023年 / 25卷 / 48期
基金：
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会; 以色列科学基金会;
关键词：
SURFACE SCATTERING; RAINBOWS;
D O I：
10.1039/d3cp04559e
中图分类号：
O64 [物理化学（理论化学）、化学物理学];
学科分类号：
070304 ; 081704 ;
摘要：
In this Reply, we show that criticisms of perturbation theory for grazing-incidence fast-atom diffraction (GIFAD) are ill-founded. We show explicitly that our formulation (W. Allison, S. Miret-Artes and E. Pollak, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2022, 24, 15851) provides a similar precision in describing the observed phenomena as ab initio potentials. Since that is the main criterion to distinguish between methods, it seems reasonable to conclude that the perturbation approach using a Morse-type potential reproduces the essential aspects of the dynamics correctly. In addition we expand on the historical context and summarize the physical insights provided by our methods.
引用
收藏
页码：33198 / 33202
页数：5
相关论文
共 12 条
12