Stakeholder theory

被引:78
|
作者
Mahajan, Ritika [1 ]
Lim, Weng Marc [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Sareen, Monica [1 ]
Kumar, Satish [2 ,5 ]
Panwar, Rajat [6 ]
机构
[1] Malaviya Natl Inst Technol, Dept Management Studies, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India
[2] Sunway Univ, Sunway Business Sch, Sunway City, Selangor, Malaysia
[3] Swinburne Univ Technol, Sch Business Law & Entrepreneurship, Hawthorn, Vic, Australia
[4] Swinburne Univ Technol, Fac Business Design & Arts, Kuching, Sarawak, Malaysia
[5] Indian Inst Management Nagpur, Dahegaon, Maharashtra, India
[6] Oregon State Univ, Corvallis, OR USA
关键词
Bibliometric analysis; Stakeholder; Stakeholder theory; Systematic literature review; CORPORATE SOCIAL-RESPONSIBILITY; FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE; SUPPLY CHAIN; SUSTAINABILITY; DETERMINANTS; PERSPECTIVE; SALIENCE; GAS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.114104
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Stakeholder theory (ST) is a profound theory in business ethics and organizational management. Though several ST reviews are available, they remain restricted to functional or niche areas. Specifically, no study, to date, has attempted to review ST research in its entirety. To address this noteworthy gap, this study endeavors to (i) offer a comprehensive definition of ST and (ii) retrospect ST research and prospect its promising avenues for future growth. Given the large corpus (n = 988) and long history (1969-2021) of ST research, this study adopts and performs a systematic literature review using bibliometric analysis (performance analysis and science mapping). Consequently, this study reveals (i) the productivity (publication) and impact (citation) of ST research and its contributors (journals, authors, countries), (ii) the major thematic clusters of ST research (ST and sustainability, ST and organizational performance, ST and strategic management, and ST and stakeholder management), and (iii) the promising avenues to advance ST research across all its major thematic clusters.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Stakeholder Collaboration: Implications for Stakeholder Theory and Practice
    Grant T. Savage
    Michele D. Bunn
    Barbara Gray
    Qian Xiao
    Sijun Wang
    Elizabeth J. Wilson
    Eric S. Williams
    Journal of Business Ethics, 2010, 96 : 21 - 26
  • [2] Towards a stakeholder society: Stakeholder theory vs theory of civil society
    Bonnafous-Boucher, Maria
    Porcher, Simon
    EUROPEAN MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2010, 7 (04) : 205 - 216
  • [3] Stakeholder Collaboration: Implications for Stakeholder Theory and Practice
    Savage, Grant T.
    Bunn, Michele D.
    Gray, Barbara
    Xiao, Qian
    Wang, Sijun
    Wilson, Elizabeth J.
    Williams, Eric S.
    JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2010, 96 : 21 - 26
  • [4] What stakeholder theory is not
    Phillips, R
    Freeman, RE
    Wicks, AC
    BUSINESS ETHICS QUARTERLY, 2003, 13 (04) : 479 - 502
  • [5] Stakeholder theory in perspective
    Pesqueux, Yvon
    Damak-Ayadi, Salma
    CORPORATE GOVERNANCE-THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BUSINESS IN SOCIETY, 2005, 5 (02): : 5 - +
  • [6] Developing stakeholder theory
    Friedman, AL
    Miles, S
    JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT STUDIES, 2002, 39 (01) : 1 - 21
  • [7] Convergent stakeholder theory
    Jones, TM
    Wicks, AC
    ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 1999, 24 (02): : 206 - 221
  • [8] Tensions in Stakeholder Theory
    Freeman, R. Edward
    Phillips, Robert
    Sisodia, Rajendra
    BUSINESS & SOCIETY, 2020, 59 (02) : 213 - 231
  • [9] Evaluating Stakeholder Theory
    J. Kaler
    Journal of Business Ethics, 2006, 69 : 249 - 268
  • [10] Extended stakeholder theory
    Zsolnai, Laszlo
    SOCIETY AND BUSINESS REVIEW, 2006, 1 (01) : 37 - 44