Pore pressure prediction assisted by machine learning models combined with interpretations: A case study of an HTHP gas field, Yinggehai Basin

被引:6
|
作者
Zhao, Xiaobo [1 ]
Chen, Xiaojun [2 ]
Lan, Zhangjian [3 ]
Wang, Xinguang [4 ]
Yao, Guangqing [1 ]
机构
[1] China Univ Geosci, Sch Earth Resources, Wuhan 430074, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Manchester, Sch Engn, Manchester M13 9PL, England
[3] CNOOC Ltd, Hainan Branch, Hainan 570311, Peoples R China
[4] CNOOC Ltd, Zhanjiang Branch, Zhanjiang 524000, Peoples R China
来源
基金
中国国家自然科学基金; 中国博士后科学基金;
关键词
Pore pressure prediction; Machine learning; Model visualization; HPHT gas field; Yinggehai basin; SOUTH CHINA SEA; IN-SITU STRESS; OVERPRESSURE; MECHANISMS; VELOCITY; FACIES; OIL;
D O I
10.1016/j.geoen.2023.212114
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Accurately estimating pore pressure in high-temperature and high-pressure (HTHP) formations is crucial to prevent drilling problems and engineering disasters. In this study, four machine learning models were developed, namely decision tree, random forest, gradient boosting decision tree, and extreme boosting decision tree models, along with the classical Eaton's method, to rapidly predict pore pressure in an HTHP gas field in the Yinggehai Basin using seven variables, including 'depth' and six common well-logging series. The results demonstrate that the machine learning models outperform the classical Eaton's method in pore pressure prediction. Among the models, the decision tree model exhibits the best performance, with the highest correlation coefficient (R2 = 0.98) and the lowest root mean squared error (0.61). Additionally, the Graphviz tool and Shapley additive explanations method were used for the visualization and interpretation of the decision tree model to gain a deeper understanding of the model's working mechanism and the reasons behind the obtained results. The interpretation revealed that the variable of 'depth' was the most significant input parameter in the decision-making process of the model. This study provides insights into the 'black-box' interpretation of machine learning models and demonstrates that tree-based machine learning models can accurately predict pore pressure in undersurface HTHP formations.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Pore pressure prediction in the Dongfang 1-1 gas field, Yinggehai Basin
    State Key Laboratory of Petroleum Resource and Prospecting, China University of Petroleum, Beijing, China
    Nauk. Visn. Natsionalnoho Hirnychoho Univ., 2 (11-16):
  • [2] Machine learning and data-driven prediction of pore pressure from geophysical logs: A case study for the Mangahewa gas field, New Zealand
    Radwan, Ahmed E.
    Wood, David A.
    Radwan, Ahmed A.
    JOURNAL OF ROCK MECHANICS AND GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING, 2022, 14 (06) : 1799 - 1809
  • [3] Machine learning and data-driven prediction of pore pressure from geophysical logs: A case study for the Mangahewa gas field, New Zealand
    Ahmed E.Radwan
    David A.Wood
    Ahmed A.Radwan
    Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, 2022, (06) : 1799 - 1809
  • [4] Quantitative Classification and Prediction of Diagenetic Facies in Tight Gas Sandstone Reservoirs via Unsupervised and Supervised Machine Learning Models: Ledong Area, Yinggehai Basin
    Zhao, Xiaobo
    Chen, Xiaojun
    Chen, Wen
    Liu, Mingqian
    Yao, Yue
    Wang, Hua
    Zhang, Hui
    Yao, Guangqing
    NATURAL RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2023, 32 (06) : 2685 - 2710
  • [5] Quantitative Classification and Prediction of Diagenetic Facies in Tight Gas Sandstone Reservoirs via Unsupervised and Supervised Machine Learning Models: Ledong Area, Yinggehai Basin
    Xiaobo Zhao
    Xiaojun Chen
    Wen Chen
    Mingqian Liu
    Yue Yao
    Hua Wang
    Hui Zhang
    Guangqing Yao
    Natural Resources Research, 2023, 32 (6) : 2685 - 2710
  • [6] Prediction of gas production potential based on machine learning in shale gas field: a case study
    Zhai, Shuo
    Geng, Shaoyang
    Li, Chengyong
    Gong, Yufeng
    Jing, Min
    Li, Yao
    ENERGY SOURCES PART A-RECOVERY UTILIZATION AND ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS, 2022, 44 (03) : 6581 - 6601
  • [7] Machine Learning Occupancy Prediction Models - A Case Study
    Alfalah, Bashar
    Shahrestani, Mehdi
    Shao, Li
    ASHRAE TRANSACTIONS 2023, VOL 129, PT 1, 2023, 129 : 694 - 702
  • [8] Machine learning assisted lithology prediction using geophysical logs: A case study from Cambay basin
    Prajapati, Rahul
    Mukherjee, Bappa
    Singh, Upendra K.
    Sain, Kalachand
    JOURNAL OF EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCE, 2024, 133 (02)
  • [9] Machine-learning assisted interpretation: Integrated fault prediction and extraction case study from the Groningen gas field, Netherlands
    Smith, Stewart
    Zimina, Olesya
    Manral, Surender
    Nickel, Michael
    INTERPRETATION-A JOURNAL OF SUBSURFACE CHARACTERIZATION, 2022, 10 (02): : SC17 - SC30
  • [10] Machine learning assisted gas hydrate saturation proxy: A case study from KG basin, India
    Konar, Suman
    Mukherjee, Bappa
    Sain, Kalachand
    HIMALAYAN GEOLOGY, 2024, 45 (01): : 89 - 107