What Makes a 5-Star Orthopaedic Sports Medicine Surgeon? An Analysis of Positive Online Patient Reviews

被引:0
|
作者
Noel, Morgan E. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Kuttner, Nicolas P. [1 ,4 ]
Lebaron, Zachary [1 ,5 ]
Richman, Evan H. [1 ,6 ]
Tummala, Sailesh [1 ]
Brinkman, Joseph C. [1 ]
Chhabra, Anikar [1 ]
机构
[1] Mayo Clin Arizona, Dept Orthoped Surg, Phoenix, AZ USA
[2] Creighton Univ, Sch Med Phoenix, 3100 North Cent Ave, Phoenix, AZ 85012 USA
[3] Wake Forest Univ, Dept Orthoped, Winston Salem, NC USA
[4] Ohio State Univ, Dept Orthoped, Columbus, OH USA
[5] Creighton Univ, Dept Radiol, Phoenix, AZ 85012 USA
[6] Univ Colorado, Dept Orthoped, Aurora, CO USA
关键词
physician reviews; sports medicine; orthopaedic surgery; positive reviews; patient satisfaction;
D O I
10.1177/23259671231181378
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background:The increased focus on patient satisfaction has led to growth in the use of physician rating websites. Purpose:To analyze the factors associated with online 5-star patient reviews for orthopaedic sports medicine surgeons. Study Design:Cross-sectional study. Methods:A total of 70 orthopaedic sports medicine surgeons were randomly selected from the AOSSM website. A search was performed for these surgeons on Yelp.com. All reviews other than 5 stars (of a possible 5 stars) were excluded from the study. Each review was categorized as referring to a surgical or nonsurgical aspect of care, and each comment within the review was categorized as being clinically or nonclinically related. Comments were further subcategorized by specific features such as bedside manner, clinical outcomes, and patient education. Categorical variables were analyzed using the chi-square test. Results:Overall, 400 five-star reviews were included in the study, comprising 1225 total positive comments. Of the 400 five-star reviews, 200 (50%) were from surgically treated patients, and 200 (50%) were from nonsurgically treated patients. Of the 1225 positive comments, 505 (41%) were clinically related, and 720 (59%) were nonclinical. The most common positive clinical comments were for clear treatment plans (191 reviews [48%]), good outcomes (173 reviews [43%]), and providing alternative treatment plans (55 reviews [14%]). The most common positive nonclinical comments were for good physician bedside manner (287 reviews [72%]), friendly/professional staff (194 reviews [49%]), and ease of scheduling (68 reviews [17%]). Conclusion:The majority of 5-star patient reviews left positive comments regarding nonclinical aspects of care such as physician bedside manner and friendly staff. The most common positive comments regarding clinical aspects concerned good outcomes and clear treatment plans. The overall most common positive comment, in both surgically and nonsurgically treated patients, referred to good bedside manner.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 13 条
  • [1] What makes deceptive online reviews? A linguistic analysis perspective
    Zhang, Wen
    Wang, Qiang
    Li, Jian
    Ma, Zhenzhong
    Bhandari, Gokul
    Peng, Rui
    HUMANITIES & SOCIAL SCIENCES COMMUNICATIONS, 2023, 10 (01):
  • [2] What makes deceptive online reviews? A linguistic analysis perspective
    Wen Zhang
    Qiang Wang
    Jian Li
    Zhenzhong Ma
    Gokul Bhandari
    Rui Peng
    Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 10
  • [3] What makes a positive experience? Offline/online communication and rapport enhancement in Airbnb positive reviews
    Hernandez-Lopez, Maria de la O.
    PRAGMATICS AND SOCIETY, 2019, 10 (02) : 177 - 204
  • [4] Analysis of Surgeon Online Reviews: Does Gender Impact Patient Reviews of Healthcare Professionals?
    Elahad, Joana A.
    Perez, Numa
    Chang, David C.
    King, David Richard
    Velmahos, George
    Kaafarani, Haytham
    Saillant, Noelle N.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2020, 231 (04) : S87 - S87
  • [5] What Affects an Orthopaedic Surgeon's Online Rating? A Large-Scale, Retrospective Analysis
    Patel, Mital D.
    Williams, Marshall D.
    Thompson, Merritt J.
    Desai, Parth N.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGEONS GLOBAL RESEARCH AND REVIEWS, 2022, 6 (03):
  • [6] The Positive Patient Experience: A Comprehensive Analysis of Plastic Surgery Online Reviews
    Chang, Irene A.
    Wells, Michael W.
    Chang, Ian A.
    Arquette, Connor P.
    Tang, Cathy J.
    Gatherwright, James R.
    Furnas, Heather J.
    AESTHETIC SURGERY JOURNAL, 2022, 42 (09) : 1083 - 1093
  • [7] Has COVID-19 Changed Consumers' Satisfiers and Dissatisfiers? Evidence from Online Reviews of 5-Star Hotels in Shanghai and Beijing
    Wu, Jie
    Yang, Tong
    JOURNAL OF CHINA TOURISM RESEARCH, 2024, 20 (02) : 430 - 452
  • [9] Negative and Positive Online Patient Reviews of Physicians-1 vs 5 Stars
    Shemirani, Nima L.
    Castrillon, Jeffrey
    JAMA FACIAL PLASTIC SURGERY, 2017, 19 (05) : 435 - 436
  • [10] What makes online reviews helpful in tourism and hospitality? a bare-bones meta-analysis
    Hu, Xingbao
    Yang, Yang
    JOURNAL OF HOSPITALITY MARKETING & MANAGEMENT, 2021, 30 (02) : 139 - 158