Multifocal/multicentric breast cancer: Does each focus matter?

被引:5
|
作者
Tong, Ying
Sun, Feixiang
Zhang, Chuanpeng
Yang, Susu
Yu, Ziyi
Zhao, Yi [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Jiangsu Prov Hosp, Jiangsu Breast Dis Ctr, 300 Guangzhou Rd, Nanjing 210029, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[2] Nanjing Med Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, 300 Guangzhou Rd, Nanjing 210029, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
来源
CANCER MEDICINE | 2023年 / 12卷 / 07期
关键词
breast cancer; intertumoral heterogeneity; multicentrical; multifocal; tumor stage; INTERNATIONAL EXPERT CONSENSUS; LYMPH-NODE STATUS; TUMOR SIZE; PROGESTERONE-RECEPTOR; PRIMARY THERAPY; MULTIPLE; DISEASE; SURVIVAL; MULTIFOCALITY; HETEROGENEITY;
D O I
10.1002/cam4.5626
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Multifocal (MF) and multicentric (MC) breast cancer cases have been increasingly diagnosed owing to the extensive use of improved preoperative breast imaging. The current tumor-node-metastasis staging system uses the dimension of the largest tumor and recommends reporting the pathological features of the largest tumor in MF/MC breast cancers.Aim: This study aimed to explore whether the largest or aggregate dimensions of MF and MC breast cancers can better predict tumor behavior. We also attempted to study the histological and biological heterogeneities of separate foci in MF and MC breast cancers to determine whether it was necessary to examine each lesion.Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 121 patients with MF/MC (103 with MF and 18 with MC) breast cancers and 484 patients with unifocal breast cancer who were treated at the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University. Two methods were used to record the T stage (using the dimensions of the largest lesion and aggregate dimensions of all lesions). The histological grade, immunohistochemical parameters, and molecular subtypes of the largest lesion and other lesions in MF/MC breast cancers were studied to assess intertumoral heterogeneity.Results: The use of aggregate dimensions upstaged 63 patients with MF/MC breast cancers to a more advanced stage and removed the independent effect of cancer multiplicity on lymph node positivity compared with the use of the largest dimension. Mismatches were found in the pathological type (9.9%), histological grade (4.1%), and molecular subtype (8.3%) among different foci.Conclusion: The tendency of MF/MC breast tumors to metastasize may be related to tumor load, which can be better predicted by the aggregate dimensions of all foci. The use of the current staging systems may require further evaluation and modification. Intertumoral heterogeneity indicates the necessity for pathological and immunohistochemical assessments of each lesion in patients with MF/MC breast cancers.
引用
收藏
页码:8815 / 8824
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Multifocal and multicentric breast cancer: Does each focus matter?
    Coombs, NJ
    Boyages, J
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2005, 23 (30) : 7497 - 7502
  • [2] Multifocal and multicentric breast cancer: Does each focus matter? (vol 23, pg 7497, 2005)
    Coombs
    Boyages
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2006, 24 (10) : 1648 - 1648
  • [3] Multifocal breast cancer and survival: Each focus does matter particularly for larger tumours
    Boyages, John
    Jayasinghe, Upali W.
    Coombs, Nathan
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2010, 46 (11) : 1990 - 1996
  • [4] Lymphoscintigraphy and SPECT/CT in multicentric and multifocal breast cancer: does each tumour have a separate drainage pattern?
    Brouwer, O. R.
    Vermeeren, L.
    van der Ploeg, I. M. C.
    Olmos, R. A. Valdes
    Loo, C. E.
    Pereira-Bouda, L. M.
    Smit, F.
    Neijenhuis, P.
    Vrouenraets, B. C.
    Sivro-Prndelj, F.
    Jap-a-Joe, S. M.
    Borgstein, P. J.
    Rutgers, E. J. Th.
    Oldenburg, H. S. A.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2012, 39 (07) : 1137 - 1143
  • [5] Lymphoscintigraphy and SPECT/CT in multicentric/multifocal breast cancer: does each tumour have a separate drainage pattern?
    Brouwer, O. R.
    Vermeeren, L.
    van der Ploeg, I.
    Olmos, R. Valdes
    Loo, C.
    Bouda, L. Pereira
    Smit, F.
    Sivro, F.
    Neijenhuis, P.
    Vrouenraets, B.
    Rutgers, E.
    Oldenburg, H.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2011, 38 : S223 - S223
  • [6] Conservative surgery for multifocal/multicentric breast cancer
    Nijenhuis, Matthijs V.
    Rutgers, Emiel J. Th.
    BREAST, 2015, 24 : S96 - S99
  • [7] US: Multicentric-multifocal breast cancer
    Giuseppetti, GM
    Chelazzi, P
    Baldassarre, S
    Marconi, E
    RADIOLOGY, 2001, 221 : 188 - 189
  • [8] Does multicentric/multifocal breast cancer differ from unifocal breast cancer? An analysis of survival and contralateral breast cancer incidence
    Yerushalmi, Rinat
    Kennecke, Hagen
    Woods, Ryan
    Olivotto, Ivo A.
    Speers, Caroline
    Gelmon, Karen A.
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2009, 117 (02) : 365 - 370
  • [9] Does multicentric/multifocal breast cancer differ from unifocal breast cancer? An analysis of survival and contralateral breast cancer incidence
    Rinat Yerushalmi
    Hagen Kennecke
    Ryan Woods
    Ivo A. Olivotto
    Caroline Speers
    Karen A. Gelmon
    Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 2009, 117 : 365 - 370
  • [10] Breast conserving surgery in patients with multifocal/multicentric breast cancer
    Eryilmaz, M. A.
    Muslumanoglu, M.
    Ozmen, V.
    Igci, A.
    Koc, M.
    JOURNAL OF BUON, 2011, 16 (03): : 450 - 453