Developing a Core Outcome Set for Prognostic Research in Palliative Cancer Care: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Study

被引:2
|
作者
Spooner, Caitlin [1 ]
Vivat, Bella [1 ]
White, Nicola [1 ]
Stone, Patrick [1 ]
机构
[1] UCL, Marie Curie Palliat Care Res Dept, 6th Floor,Maple House,149 Tottenham Court Rd, London W1T 7NF, England
来源
JMIR RESEARCH PROTOCOLS | 2023年 / 12卷
基金
英国经济与社会研究理事会;
关键词
core outcome set; palliative care; end-of-life; prognosis; advanced cancer; systematic review; interviews; Delphi study; CLINICAL-TRIALS; QUALITY; HEALTH; TOOL;
D O I
10.2196/49774
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Studies exploring the impact of receiving end-of-life prognoses in patients with advanced cancer use a variety of different measures to evaluate the outcomes, and thus report often conflicting findings. The standardization of outcomes reported in studies of prognostication in palliative cancer care could enable uniform assessment and reporting, as well as intertrial comparisons. A core outcome set promotes consistency in outcome selection and reporting among studies within a particular population. We aim to develop a set of core outcomes to be used to measure the impact of end-of-life prognostication in palliative cancer care. Objective: This protocol outlines the proposed methodology to develop a core outcome set for measuring the impact of end-of-life prognostication in palliative cancer care. Methods: We will adopt a mixed methods approach consisting of 3 phases using methodology recommended by the Core Outcome Measure in Effectiveness Trials (COMET) initiative. In phase I, we will conduct a systematic review to identify existing outcomes that prognostic studies have previously used, so as to inform the development of items and domains for the proposed core outcome set. Phase II will consist of semistructured interviews with patients with advanced cancer who are receiving palliative care, informal caregivers, and clinicians, to explore their perceptions and experiences of end-of-life prognostication. Outcomes identified in the interviews will be combined with those found in existing literature and taken forward to phase III, a Delphi survey, in which we will ask patients, informal caregivers, clinicians, and relevant researchers to rate these outcomes until consensus is achieved as to which are considered to be the most important for inclusion in the core outcome set. The resulting, prioritized outcomes will be discussed in a consensus meeting to agree and endorse the final core outcome set. Results: Ethical approval was received for this study in September 2022. As of July 2023, we have completed and published the systematic review (phase I) and have started recruitment for phase II. Data analysis for phase II has not yet started. We expect Conclusions: This protocol presents the stepwise approach that will be taken to develop a core outcome set for measuring the impact of end-of-life prognostication in palliative cancer care. The final core outcome set has the potential for translation into clinical practice, allowing for consistent evaluation of emerging prognostic algorithms and improving communication of end-of-life prognostication. This study will also potentially facilitate the design of future clinical trials of the impact of end-of-life prognostication in palliative care that are acceptable to key stakeholders. International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/49774
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The NeoPACE study: study protocol for the development of a core outcome set for neonatal palliative care
    Gallagher, Katie
    Chant, Kathy
    Mancini, Alex
    Bluebond-Langner, Myra
    Marlow, Neil
    BMC PALLIATIVE CARE, 2023, 22 (01)
  • [2] The NeoPACE study: study protocol for the development of a core outcome set for neonatal palliative care
    Katie Gallagher
    Kathy Chant
    Alex Mancini
    Myra Bluebond-Langner
    Neil Marlow
    BMC Palliative Care, 22
  • [3] Protocol for the development of a core outcome set for stillbirth care research (iCHOOSE Study)
    Bakhbakhi, Danya
    Fraser, Abigail
    Siasakos, Dimitris
    Hinton, Lisa
    Davies, Anna
    Merriel, Abi
    Duffy, James M. N.
    Redshaw, Maggie
    Lynch, Mary
    Timlin, Laura
    Flenady, Vicki
    Heazell, Alexander Edward
    Downe, Soo
    Slade, Pauline
    Brookes, Sara
    Wojcieszek, Aleena
    Murphy, Margaret
    Salgado, Heloisa de Oliveira
    Pollock, Danielle
    Aggarwal, Neelam
    Attachie, Irene
    Leisher, Susannah
    Kihusa, Wanijiru
    Mulley, Kate
    Wimmer, Lindsey
    Burden, Christy
    BMJ OPEN, 2022, 12 (02):
  • [4] What to measure in biliary atresia research: study protocol for developing a core outcome set
    Maguire, Christopher
    Tyack, Zephanie
    Kimble, Roy M.
    Griffin, Bronwyn Ruth
    Yesberg, Helen Joanna
    Choo, Fang Ming
    McBride, Craig Antony
    BMJ OPEN, 2021, 11 (08):
  • [5] A protocol for developing, disseminating, and implementing a core outcome set for adenomyosis research
    Tellum, T.
    Naftalin, J.
    Hirsch, M.
    Saridogan, E.
    Jurkovic, D.
    FACTS VIEWS AND VISION IN OBGYN, 2021, 13 (03): : 203 - 209
  • [6] Developing a Core Outcome Set for Cytoreductive Surgery for Colorectal Cancer with Peritoneal Metastases: A Mixed-Method Study Protocol
    Raichurkar, Pratik
    Brown, Kilian
    Ansari, Nabila
    Koh, Cherry
    Ahmadi, Nima
    Solomon, Michael
    Moran, Brendan
    Steffens, Daniel
    GASTROINTESTINAL DISORDERS, 2024, 6 (01): : 143 - 151
  • [7] Developing a Core Outcome Set for Assessing Clinical Safety Outcomes of Prostate Cancer in Clinical Trials of Traditional Chinese Medicine: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Study
    Tian, Huichuan
    Zhang, Yao
    Ren, Jiajun
    Wang, Chaoran
    Mou, Ruiyu
    Li, Xiaojiang
    Jia, Yingjie
    JMIR RESEARCH PROTOCOLS, 2023, 12
  • [8] The CONSENSUS study: protocol for a mixed methods study to establish which outcomes should be included in a core outcome set for oropharyngeal cancer
    Aoife MI Waters
    Catrin Tudur Smith
    Bridget Young
    Terry M Jones
    Trials, 15
  • [9] The CONSENSUS study: protocol for a mixed methods study to establish which outcomes should be included in a core outcome set for oropharyngeal cancer
    Waters, Aoife M. I.
    Smith, Catrin Tudur
    Young, Bridget
    Jones, Terry M.
    TRIALS, 2014, 15
  • [10] Protocol for developing a core outcome set for male infertility research: an international consensus development study
    Rimmer, Michael P.
    Howie, Ruth A.
    Anderson, Richard A.
    Barratt, Christopher L. R.
    Barnhart, Kurt T.
    Beebeejaun, Yusuf
    Bertolla, Ricardo Pimenta
    Bhattacharya, Siladitya
    Bjorndahl, Lars
    Bortoletto, Pietro
    Brannigan, Robert E.
    Cantineau, Astrid E. P.
    Caroppo, Ettore
    Collura, Barbara L.
    Coward, Kevin
    Eisenberg, Michael L.
    De Geyter, Christian
    Goulis, Dimitrios G.
    Henkel, Ralf R.
    Ho, Vu N. A.
    Hussein, Alayman F.
    Huyser, Carin
    Kadijk, Jozef H.
    Kamath, Mohan S.
    Khashaba, Shadi
    Kobori, Yoshitomo
    Kopeika, Julia
    Kucuk, Tansu
    Lujan, Saturnino
    Matsaseng, Thabo Christopher
    Mathur, Raj S.
    McEleny, Kevin
    Mitchell, Rod T.
    Mol, Ben W.
    Murage, Alfred M.
    Ng, Ernest H. Y.
    Pacey, Allan
    Perheentupa, Antti H.
    Du Plessis, Stefan
    Rives, Nathalie
    Sarris, Ippokratis
    Schlegel, Peter N.
    Shabbir, Majid
    Smiechowski, Maciej
    Subramanian, Venkatesh
    Sunkara, Sesh K.
    Tarlarzis, Basil C.
    Tuttelmann, Frank
    Vail, Andy
    van Wely, Madelon
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION OPEN, 2022, 2022 (02)