Schools and Juvenile Treatment Drug Courts: A Case Study on Treatment Access through Collaboration and Advocacy

被引:0
|
作者
Ramey, Jennifer Smith [1 ]
Volk, Fred [2 ]
机构
[1] Horizon Behav Hlth, Subst Use Cooccurring Program, 2215 Langhorne Rd, Lynchburg, VA 24501 USA
[2] Liberty Univ, Sch Behav Sci, Dept Counselor Educ & Family Studies, Lynchburg, VA USA
关键词
adolescent substance use; court service units; cross-sector collaboration; schools; SUBSTANCE USE; NETWORK;
D O I
10.1093/cs/cdad019
中图分类号
C916 [社会工作、社会管理、社会规划];
学科分类号
1204 ;
摘要
Adolescent substance use is typically addressed from the perspectives of school personnel (e.g., teachers, school counselors, social workers, and resource officers) who interact daily with students in school settings. Consequences of adolescent substance use in the schools may include suspension or expulsion and possible legal involvement. However, many adolescents do not have access to evidence-based treatment to address drug and alcohol use. Services are often not available or fragmented, resulting in poor compliance with treatment and inadequate treatment outcomes for youth. Cross-sector collaboration among schools, community behavioral health agencies, and juvenile court service units offers an opportunity to improve access to care and efficiency in delivering care to adolescents with drug and alcohol problems. Illuminated through a single case study, embedded substance use treatment in schools through partnerships with the court service unit and community behavioral health providers can increase access to care. Counselors and social workers play a key role in advocating for joint efforts to increase service access and improve treatment outcomes. Advocacy efforts may include participation and leadership in community coalitions, training and consultation in evidence-based practices, and seamless communication across all organizations that serve youth with substance use disorders.
引用
收藏
页码:243 / 250
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Juvenile Drug Treatment Courts: Policy And Practice Scan
    Choo, Kyungseok
    Petrosino, Anthony
    Sutherland, Hannah
    Fronius, Trevor
    Guckenburg, Sarah
    Tran, Jacquelyn
    Earl, Kevin
    JUVENILE AND FAMILY COURT JOURNAL, 2020, 71 (03) : 5 - 27
  • [2] Recovery spaces and therapeutic jurisprudence: a case study of the family treatment drug courts
    Moreno, Christopher M.
    Curti, Giorgio H.
    SOCIAL & CULTURAL GEOGRAPHY, 2012, 13 (02) : 161 - 183
  • [3] Implementing Juvenile Drug Treatment Courts: A Meta-aggregation of Process Evaluations
    Wilson, David B.
    Olaghere, Ajima
    Kimbrell, Catherine S.
    JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN CRIME AND DELINQUENCY, 2019, 56 (04): : 605 - 645
  • [4] System-level effects of integrating a promising treatment into juvenile drug courts
    McCart, Michael R.
    Henggeler, Scott W.
    Chapman, Jason E.
    Cunningham, Phillippe B.
    JOURNAL OF SUBSTANCE ABUSE TREATMENT, 2012, 43 (02) : 231 - 243
  • [5] The Effectiveness of Juvenile Treatment Drug Courts: A Meta-Analytic Review of Literature
    Stein, David M.
    Homan, Kendra J.
    DeBerard, Scott
    JOURNAL OF CHILD & ADOLESCENT SUBSTANCE ABUSE, 2015, 24 (02) : 80 - 93
  • [6] COLLABORATION WITH JUVENILE AUTHORITIES IN THE TREATMENT OF A DELINQUENT
    KAPLAN, M
    NATHAN, E
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHOPSYCHIATRY, 1962, 32 (02) : 323 - 324
  • [7] Examining the Effects of Juvenile Drug Treatment Courts: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Tanner-Smith, Emily E.
    Mojekwu, Frank
    Frankel, Lauren
    CRIMINAL JUSTICE AND BEHAVIOR, 2024, 51 (01) : 148 - 170
  • [8] Sanctions in Family Drug Treatment Courts
    Edwards, Judge Leonard
    JUVENILE AND FAMILY COURT JOURNAL, 2010, 61 (01) : 55 - 62
  • [9] The emergence of drug treatment courts in Australia
    Makkai, T
    SUBSTANCE USE & MISUSE, 2002, 37 (12-13) : 1567 - 1594
  • [10] Drug treatment courts and the disease paradigm
    Nolan, JL
    SUBSTANCE USE & MISUSE, 2002, 37 (12-13) : 1723 - 1750