Private Insurance, Public Welfare, and Financial Markets: Alpine and Maritime Countries in Comparative-Historical Perspective

被引:3
|
作者
van der Heide, Arjen [1 ,3 ]
Kohl, Sebastian [2 ]
机构
[1] Leiden Univ, Leiden, Netherlands
[2] Free Univ Berlin, Berlin, Germany
[3] Netherlands Inst Social Res, Bezuidenhoutseweg 30, The Hague, Netherlands
关键词
insurance; varieties of capitalism; financial development; welfare; historical comparison; LIFE-INSURANCE; SAVINGS BANKS; PENSION; POLITICS; POLICY; RISK; PROFESSION; ACTUARIES; COMPANIES; AMERICA;
D O I
10.1177/00323292231161445
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
Contemporary capitalist societies use different institutions to manage economic risks. While different public welfare state and financial institutions (banks, capital markets) have been studied across coordinated and liberal market economies, the different worlds of private insurance institutions have been understudied. Building on new insurance data sets (1880-2017), we find that countries with a Maritime (USA, GBR, CAN) in contrast to the more backward Alpine (AUT, DEU, CHE) insurance tradition developed bigger life and nonlife insurance earlier, with less state-associated and reinsurance enterprises, but riskier investments steered toward financial markets. We argue that the larger and more "Maritime" the insurance sector, the more it made welfare states liberal and securities markets large. Insurance is thus a hidden factor for countries' varieties of capitalism and worlds of welfare. The recent convergence on the Maritime model, however, implies that the riskier and risk-individualizing type of private insurance has added to privatization and securitization trends everywhere.
引用
收藏
页码:268 / 303
页数:36
相关论文
共 3 条