Towards a partnership of teachers and intelligent learning technology: A systematic literature review of model-based learning analytics

被引:8
|
作者
Ley, Tobias [1 ,2 ,5 ]
Tammets, Kairit [2 ]
Pishtari, Gerti [1 ]
Chejara, Pankaj [2 ]
Kasepalu, Reet [2 ]
Khalil, Mohammad [3 ]
Saar, Merike [2 ]
Tuvi, Iiris [4 ]
Vaeljataga, Terje [2 ]
Wasson, Barbara [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Continuing Educ Krems, Ctr Digitalizat Lifelong Learning, Krems An Der Donau, Austria
[2] Tallinn Univ, Ctr Educ Technol, Tallinn, Estonia
[3] Univ Bergen, Ctr Sci Learning & Technol SLATE, Bergen, Norway
[4] Univ Tartu, Inst Psychol, Tartu, Estonia
[5] Univ Continuing Educ Krems, Krems An Der Donau, Austria
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
adaptive learning technology; hybrid human-AI technologies; intelligent tutoring systems; learning analytics; systematic literature review; teacher dashboards; DASHBOARD; SUPPORT; ONLINE;
D O I
10.1111/jcal.12844
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
BackgroundWith increased use of artificial intelligence in the classroom, there is now a need to better understand the complementarity of intelligent learning technology and teachers to produce effective instruction. ObjectiveThe paper reviews the current research on intelligent learning technology designed to make models of student learning and instruction transparent to teachers, an area we call model-based learning analytics. We intended to gain an insight into the coupling between the knowledge models that underpin the intelligent system and the knowledge used by teachers in their classroom decision making. MethodsUsing a systematic literature review methodology, we first identified 42 papers, mainly from the domain of intelligent tutoring systems and learning analytics dashboards that conformed to our selection criteria. We then qualitatively analysed the context in which the systems were applied, models they used and benefits reported for teachers and learners. Results and ConclusionsA majority of papers used either domain or learner models, suggesting that instructional decisions are mostly left to teachers. Compared to previous reviews, our set of papers appeared to have a stronger focus on providing teachers with theory-driven insights and instructional decisions. This suggests that model-based learning analytics can address some of the shortcomings of the field, like meaningfulness and actionability of learning analytics tools. However, impact in the classroom still needs further research, as in half of the cases the reported benefits were not backed with evidence. Future research should focus on the dynamic interaction between teachers and technology and how learning analytics has an impact on learning and decision making by teachers and students. We offer a taxonomy of knowledge models that can serve as a starting point for designing such interaction.
引用
收藏
页码:1397 / 1417
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Model-Based Learning Analytics for a Partnership of Teachers and Intelligent Systems: A Bibliometric Systematic Review
    Pishtari, Gerti
    Ley, Tobias
    Khalil, Mohammad
    Kasepalu, Reet
    Tuvi, Iiris
    EDUCATION SCIENCES, 2023, 13 (05):
  • [2] Technology and Learning Analytics: A Literature Review
    Contreras-Bravo, Leonardo-Emiro
    Tarazona-Bermudez, Giovanny-Mauricio
    Rodriguez-Molano, Jose-Ignacio
    REVISTA CIENTIFICA, 2021, 41 (02): : 150 - 168
  • [3] Learning analytics: a systematic literature review
    Gil Vera, Victor Daniel
    CUADERNO ACTIVA, 2018, (10): : 15 - 26
  • [4] Learning analytics for online game-Based learning: a systematic literature review
    Banihashem, Seyyed Kazem
    Dehghanzadeh, Hojjat
    Clark, Douglas
    Noroozi, Omid
    Biemans, Harm J. A.
    BEHAVIOUR & INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, 2024, 43 (12) : 2689 - 2716
  • [5] Learning Analytics for Learning Design: A Systematic Literature Review of Analytics-Driven Design to Enhance Learning
    Mangaroska, Katerina
    Giannakos, Michail
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON LEARNING TECHNOLOGIES, 2019, 12 (04): : 516 - 534
  • [6] Learning Analytics in Formative Assessment: A Systematic Literature Review
    Zhang, Ke
    Yilmaz, Ramazan
    Ustun, Ahmet Berk
    Karaoglan Yilmaz, Fatma Gizem
    JOURNAL OF MEASUREMENT AND EVALUATION IN EDUCATION AND PSYCHOLOGY-EPOD, 2023, 14 : 382 - 395
  • [7] Learning Analytics in Serious Games: a systematic review of literature
    Maris Massa, Stella
    Kuhn, Franco D.
    2018 IEEE BIENNIAL CONGRESS OF ARGENTINA (ARGENCON), 2018,
  • [8] Teachers' Views Regarding Learning Analytics Usage Based on the Technology Acceptance Model
    Mavroudi, Anna
    Papadakis, Spyros
    Ioannou, Ioannis
    TECHTRENDS, 2021, 65 (03) : 278 - 287
  • [9] Teachers’ Views Regarding Learning Analytics Usage Based on the Technology Acceptance Model
    Anna Mavroudi
    Spyros Papadakis
    Ioannis Ioannou
    TechTrends, 2021, 65 : 278 - 287
  • [10] Where Is the Learning in Learning Analytics? A Systematic Literature Review to Identify Measures of Affected Learning
    Knobbout, Justian
    van der Stappen, Esther
    LIFELONG TECHNOLOGY-ENHANCED LEARNING, EC-TEL 2018, 2018, 11082 : 88 - 100