Explainable Image Quality Assessments in Teledermatological Photography

被引:4
|
作者
Jalaboi, Raluca [1 ,2 ]
Winther, Ole [1 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
Galimzianova, Alfiia [2 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Denmark, Dept Appl Math & Comp Sci, Lyngby, Denmark
[2] Medable AS, Copenhagen, Denmark
[3] Pioneer Ctr AI, Copenhagen, Denmark
[4] Univ Copenhagen, Bioinformat Ctr, Dept Biol, Copenhagen, Denmark
[5] Copenhagen Univ Hosp, Ctr Genom Med, Rigshosp, Copenhagen, Denmark
关键词
teledermatology; image quality; artificial intelligence; deep learning; explainability; telemedicine;
D O I
10.1089/tmj.2022.0405
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background and Objectives: Image quality is a crucial factor in the effectiveness and efficiency of teledermatological consultations. However, up to 50% of images sent by patients have quality issues, thus increasing the time to diagnosis and treatment. An automated, easily deployable, explainable method for assessing image quality is necessary to improve the current teledermatological consultation flow. We introduce ImageQX, a convolutional neural network for image quality assessment with a learning mechanism for identifying the most common poor image quality explanations: bad framing, bad lighting, blur, low resolution, and distance issues.Methods: ImageQX was trained on 26,635 photographs and validated on 9,874 photographs, each annotated with image quality labels and poor image quality explanations by up to 12 board-certified dermatologists. The photographic images were taken between 2017 and 2019 using a mobile skin disease tracking application accessible worldwide.Results: Our method achieves expert-level performance for both image quality assessment and poor image quality explanation. For image quality assessment, ImageQX obtains a macro F1-score of 0.73 +/- 0.01, which places it within standard deviation of the pairwise inter-rater F1-score of 0.77 +/- 0.07. For poor image quality explanations, our method obtains F1-scores of between 0.37 +/- 0.01 and 0.70 +/- 0.01, similar to the inter-rater pairwise F1-score of between 0.24 +/- 0.15 and 0.83 +/- 0.06. Moreover, with a size of only 15 MB, ImageQX is easily deployable on mobile devices.Conclusion: With an image quality detection performance similar to that of dermatologists, incorporating ImageQX into the teledermatology flow can enable a better, faster flow for remote consultations.
引用
收藏
页码:1342 / 1348
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] REVIEW OF PHYSICAL ASSESSMENTS OF IMAGE QUALITY
    MOORES, BM
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 1981, 54 (638): : 164 - 165
  • [2] A feasibility analysis of image approximation with image quality assessments
    Rahman, Md. Abdur
    Huq, Aminul
    Tunny, Salma Sultana
    Anik, Maruf Hossain
    Pervin, Mst Tasnim
    Islam, Md. Rashidul
    IET IMAGE PROCESSING, 2024, 18 (04) : 897 - 913
  • [3] Image Quality Evaluation of Light Field Photography
    Fu, Qiang
    Zhou, Zhiliang
    Yuan, Yan
    Bin Xiangli
    IMAGE QUALITY AND SYSTEM PERFORMANCE VIII, 2011, 7867
  • [4] SOME ASPECTS OF IMAGE QUALITY IN SATELLITE PHOTOGRAPHY
    THOMSON, GH
    PHOTOGRAMMETRIC RECORD, 1985, 11 (66): : 717 - 720
  • [5] EyeQual: Accurate, Explainable, Retinal Image Quality Assessment
    Costa, Pedro
    Campilho, Aurelio
    Hooi, Bryan
    Smailagic, Asim
    Kitani, Kris
    Liu, Shenghua
    Faloutsos, Christos
    Galdran, Adrian
    2017 16TH IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MACHINE LEARNING AND APPLICATIONS (ICMLA), 2017, : 323 - 330
  • [6] Objective Performance of Compressed Image Quality Assessments
    Sakuldee, Ratchakit
    Udomhunsakul, Somkait
    PROCEEDINGS OF WORLD ACADEMY OF SCIENCE, ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY, VOL 26, PARTS 1 AND 2, DECEMBER 2007, 2007, 26 : 434 - 443
  • [7] Explainable Image Quality Analysis of Chest X-Rays
    Ozer, Caner
    Oksuz, Ilkay
    MEDICAL IMAGING WITH DEEP LEARNING, VOL 143, 2021, 143 : 567 - 580
  • [8] A Review of Image Quality Assessment with application to Computational Photography
    Maitre, Henri
    MIPPR 2015: MULTISPECTRAL IMAGE ACQUISITION, PROCESSING, AND ANALYSIS, 2015, 9811
  • [9] Ultraviolet photography in vitiligo: image quality, validity and reliability
    Uitentuis, S. E.
    Heilmann, M. N.
    Verdaasdonk, R. M.
    Bae, J. M.
    Luiten, R. M.
    Wolkerstorfer, A.
    Bekkenk, M. W.
    JOURNAL OF THE EUROPEAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY AND VENEREOLOGY, 2020, 34 (07) : 1590 - 1594
  • [10] IMAGE QUALITY ANALYSIS AND CONTROL OF COLOR AND MULTIBAND PHOTOGRAPHY
    HECHT, AS
    ODELL, JS
    PHOTOGRAMMETRIC ENGINEERING AND REMOTE SENSING, 1974, 40 (06): : 726 - 726