How institutional quality, and energy production sources, affect the environmental sustainability of bri countries: A comparison of different income groups

被引:4
|
作者
Sheng, Weiyan [1 ]
Meng, Fei [1 ]
Akbar, Muhammad Waqas [1 ]
机构
[1] Shenzhen Univ, China Ctr Special Econ Zone Res, Shenzhen, Guangdong, Peoples R China
来源
PLOS ONE | 2023年 / 18卷 / 09期
关键词
CARBON EMISSIONS; ECONOMIC-GROWTH; QUANTILE REGRESSION; DYNAMIC IMPACT; CO2; EMISSIONS; CONSUMPTION; OPENNESS; BELT;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0291144
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Institutions and energy production sources shape environmental policies and practices. Institutions establish frameworks for renewable energy and enforce environmental protection measures. Conventional energy sources cause pollution and climate change, while green energy sources have lower environmental impacts. In this study we analyzed how quality institutions, along with different types of energy production sources affect the quality of environment in 101 countries that are part of the BRI, a global development project. We used a statistical method called panel quantile regression to analyze data from 2000 to 2020. We found that producing energy from renewable sources, such as wind and solar, reduces CO2 emissions by 0.003% in BRI countries. However, producing energy from non-renewable sources, such as gas and coal, harms the environment more in high-income and middle-income countries. We also found that having better institutional quality reduces CO2 emissions by 3.421%, 2.710%, and 0.006% in different groups of BRI countries. This means that having stronger and fairer institutions can help protect the environment by limiting the use of non-renewable energy sources and encouraging the use of renewable ones. Our study suggests that improving institutional quality is a key factor for achieving green energy and environmental sustainability in BRI countries.
引用
收藏
页数:25
相关论文
共 25 条
  • [1] Nexus between disaggregated energy sources, institutional quality, and environmental degradation in BRI countries: a penal quantile regression analysis
    Muhammad Waqas Akbar
    Ruoyu Zhong
    Zeenat Zia
    Junaid Jahangir
    Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2022, 29 : 43155 - 43168
  • [2] Nexus between disaggregated energy sources, institutional quality, and environmental degradation in BRI countries: a penal quantile regression analysis
    Akbar, Muhammad Waqas
    Zhong, Ruoyu
    Zia, Zeenat
    Jahangir, Junaid
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2022, 29 (28) : 43155 - 43168
  • [3] The role of financial development and institutional quality in environmental sustainability: panel data evidence from the BRI countries
    Hayat Khan
    Liu Weili
    Itbar Khan
    Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2022, 29 : 83624 - 83635
  • [4] The role of financial development and institutional quality in environmental sustainability: panel data evidence from the BRI countries
    Khan, Hayat
    Liu Weili
    Khan, Itbar
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2022, 29 (55) : 83624 - 83635
  • [5] The crucial roles of ICT, renewable energy sources, industrialization, and institutional quality in achieving environmental sustainability in BRICS
    Saba C.S.
    Djemo C.R.T.
    Ngepah N.
    Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 31 (24) : 35083 - 35114
  • [6] How infrastructure development, technological innovation, and institutional quality impact the environmental quality of G7 countries: A step towards environmental sustainability
    Zaman, Badee Uz
    Yu, Hui-Yun
    SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, 2024, 32 (04) : 3495 - 3517
  • [7] How do energy consumption, globalization, and income inequality affect environmental quality across growth regimes?
    Abdurrahman Nazif Çatık
    Çağla Bucak
    Esra Ballı
    Muge Manga
    Mehmet Akif Destek
    Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2024, 31 : 10976 - 10993
  • [8] How do energy consumption, globalization, and income inequality affect environmental quality across growth regimes?
    Catik, Abdurrahman Nazif
    Bucak, Cagla
    Balli, Esra
    Manga, Muge
    Destek, Mehmet Akif
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2024, 31 (07) : 10976 - 10993
  • [9] Measuring the environmental sustainability of 2030 Agenda implementation in EU countries: How do different assessment methods affect results?
    Tothova, Dominika
    Heglasova, Maria
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2022, 322
  • [10] Towards environmental sustainability path in Africa: The critical role of ICT, renewable energy sources, agriculturalization, industrialization and institutional quality
    Saba, Charles Shaaba
    Djemo, Charles Raoul Tchuinkam
    Eita, Joel Hinaunye
    Ngepah, Nicholas
    ENERGY REPORTS, 2023, 10 : 4025 - 4050