What does ChatGPT advise about predatory publishing?

被引：4
|
作者：
Tsigaris, Panagiotis [1 ]
Kendall, Graham [2 ]
Teixeira da Silva, Jaime A. [3 ]
机构：
[1] Thompson Rivers Univ, Dept Econ, 805 TRU Way, Kamloops, BC V2C 0C8, Canada
[2] Univ Nottingham UK & Malaysia, Univ Pk, Nottingham NG7 2RD, England
[3] Ikenobe 3011-2, Kagawa 7610799, Japan
来源：
JOURNAL OF PROFESSIONAL NURSING | 2023年 / 49卷
关键词：
Ethics; Safelists (whitelists) and watchlists (blacklists); Transparency; Trust; JOURNALS;
D O I：
10.1016/j.profnurs.2023.08.002
中图分类号：
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号：
1011 ;
摘要：
The debate surrounding "predatory publishing" continues to be unable to find entirely effective solutions to dealing with this problem, despite fervent efforts by many academics and policy makers around the world. Given this situation, we were interested in appreciating whether ChatGPT would be able to offer insight and solutions, to complement current human-based efforts.
引用
收藏
页码：188 / 189
页数：2
相关论文
共 50 条
12345