Substantial uncertainties in global soil organic carbon simulated by multiple terrestrial carbon cycle models

被引:4
|
作者
Wang, Zhaoqi [1 ,2 ]
Lin, Yuanhao [1 ]
Cai, Lang [1 ]
Wu, Guiling [1 ]
Zheng, Kai [1 ]
Liu, Xiang [1 ]
Huang, Xiaotao [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Qinghai Univ, State Key Lab Plateau Ecol & Agr, 251 Ningda Rd, Xining 810016, Peoples R China
[2] Qinghai Univ, Sanjiangyuan Grassland Ecosyst Natl Observat & Res, Xining, Peoples R China
[3] Chinese Acad Sci, Northwest Inst Plateau Biol, Key Lab Restorat Ecol Cold Reg Lab Qinghai, 23 Xinning Rd, Xining 810008, Peoples R China
[4] Chinese Acad Sci, Key Lab Adaptat & Evolut Plateau Biota, Xining, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
carbon cycle model; model intercomparison; soil microorganism; soil organic carbon; uncertainty; EARTH SYSTEM MODEL; NONLINEAR MICROBIAL MODELS; LAND-SURFACE MODEL; SEA-LEVEL RISE; PHOSPHORUS CYCLES; COUPLED CARBON; NITROGEN; CLIMATE; VERSION; ECOSYSTEM;
D O I
10.1002/ldr.4679
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Soil organic carbon (SOC) is critical to the terrestrial ecosystem carbon cycle and global climate change. The carbon cycle model coupled with microbial processes can improve the projection of SOC. However, it remains unclear whether microbial models are superior to multiple terrestrial carbon cycle models and how large the simulation uncertainties of SOC are. Therefore, we simulate the spatial patterns of global SOC by the MIMICS (explicit nonlinear microbial carbon cycle model) and the DCC (implicit linear carbon cycle model), compare the SOC with that of the CMIP6 MME (multi-model ensemble) and the observation to obtain the uncertainties of SOC, and analyze the sensitivity of the parameters in the two models. The results show that the SOC simulated by the MIMICS is 1615.4 +/- 54.3 PgC, which is higher than that of the DCC (668.5 +/- 102.1 PgC), the CMIP6 MME (1443.7 +/- 795.8 PgC), and the observation (1519.1 PgC). The SOC of the DCC and MIMICS are regulated by NPP, and that of DCC is more sensitive to climate, while that of MIMICS is mainly influenced by the Michaelis-Menten equation and microbial carbon use efficiency. We reveal the spatial patterns of uncertainty in global SOC simulated by the explicit and implicit microbial processes of multiple terrestrial carbon cycle models. Unfortunately, neither the DCC, the MIMICS nor the CMIP6 MME simulate SOC satisfactorily, especially in the high latitudes of the Northern Hemisphere, and the simulation of SOC in this region needs to be improved.
引用
收藏
页码:3225 / 3249
页数:25
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Global patterns and controls of soil organic carbon dynamics as simulated by multiple terrestrial biosphere models: Current status and future directions
    Tian, Hanqin
    Lu, Chaoqun
    Yang, Jia
    Banger, Kamaljit
    Huntzinger, Deborah N.
    Schwalm, Christopher R.
    Michalak, Anna M.
    Cook, Robert
    Ciais, Philippe
    Hayes, Daniel
    Huang, Maoyi
    Ito, Akihiko
    Jain, Atul K.
    Lei, Huimin
    Mao, Jiafu
    Pan, Shufen
    Post, Wilfred M.
    Peng, Shushi
    Poulter, Benjamin
    Ren, Wei
    Ricciuto, Daniel
    Schaefer, Kevin
    Shi, Xiaoying
    Tao, Bo
    Wang, Weile
    Wei, Yaxing
    Yang, Qichun
    Zhang, Bowen
    Zeng, Ning
    GLOBAL BIOGEOCHEMICAL CYCLES, 2015, 29 (06) : 775 - 792
  • [2] Global and regional soil organic carbon estimates: Magnitudes and uncertainties
    Ziqi LIN
    Yongjiu DAI
    Umakant MISHRA
    Guocheng WANG
    Wei SHANGGUAN
    Wen ZHANG
    Zhangcai QIN
    Pedosphere, 2024, 34 (04) : 685 - 698
  • [3] Global and regional soil organic carbon estimates: Magnitudes and uncertainties
    Lin, Ziqi
    Dai, Yongjiu
    Mishra, Umakant
    Wang, Guocheng
    Shangguan, Wei
    Zhang, Wen
    Qin, Zhangcai
    PEDOSPHERE, 2024, 34 (04) : 685 - 698
  • [4] A prognostic phenology scheme for global terrestrial carbon cycle models
    Kaduk, J
    Heimann, M
    CLIMATE RESEARCH, 1996, 6 (01) : 1 - 19
  • [5] UNCERTAINTIES IN THE GLOBAL CARBON-CYCLE
    TANS, PP
    PURE AND APPLIED CHEMISTRY, 1991, 63 (05) : 766 - 768
  • [6] THE GLOBAL TERRESTRIAL CARBON-CYCLE
    SMITH, TM
    CRAMER, WP
    DIXON, RK
    LEEMANS, R
    NEILSON, RP
    SOLOMON, AM
    WATER AIR AND SOIL POLLUTION, 1993, 70 (1-4): : 19 - 37
  • [7] Multiple temporal scale variability during the twentieth century in global carbon dynamics simulated by a coupled climate–terrestrial carbon cycle model
    Tomomichi Kato
    Akihiko Ito
    Michio Kawamiya
    Climate Dynamics, 2009, 32 : 901 - 923
  • [8] CHEMISTRY OF ORGANIC-CARBON IN SOIL WITH RELATIONSHIP TO THE GLOBAL CARBON-CYCLE
    POST, WM
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 1988, 196 : 8 - ENVR
  • [9] Historical advances in the study of global terrestrial soil organic carbon sequestration
    Feller, C.
    Bernoux, M.
    WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2008, 28 (04) : 734 - 740
  • [10] SOIL ORGANIC-MATTER AND THE GLOBAL CARBON-CYCLE
    WALLACE, A
    WALLACE, GA
    CHA, JW
    JOURNAL OF PLANT NUTRITION, 1990, 13 (3-4) : 459 - 466