Group prenatal care for pregnant women with opioid use disorder: Preliminary evidence for acceptability and benefits compared with individual prenatal care

被引:2
|
作者
Short, Vanessa L. [1 ]
Hand, Dennis J. [1 ]
Mancuso, Francesca [2 ]
Raju, Amulya [3 ]
Sinnott, Jacqueline [3 ]
Caldarone, Lindsay [4 ]
Rosenthall, Emily [5 ]
Liveright, Elizabeth [3 ]
Abatemarco, Diane J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Thomas Jefferson Univ, Coll Nursing, 1233 Locust St Suite 401, Philadelphia, PA 19144 USA
[2] Indiana Univ Sch Med, Indianapolis, IN USA
[3] Thomas Jefferson Univ, Sidney Kimmel Med Coll, Philadelphia, PA USA
[4] Univ Vermont, Burlington, VT USA
[5] Boston Univ, Boston, MA USA
来源
BIRTH-ISSUES IN PERINATAL CARE | 2024年 / 51卷 / 01期
关键词
group-based healthcare; maternal opioid use disorder; prenatal care; SUBSTANCE USE DISORDER; CENTERING PREGNANCY; PERINATAL OUTCOMES; POSTPARTUM WOMEN; BIRTH OUTCOMES; PREVALENCE; MODEL; MOTHERS; RATES;
D O I
10.1111/birt.12775
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
IntroductionThe effectiveness of group prenatal care (G-PNC) compared with individual prenatal care (I-PNC) for women with opioid use disorder (OUD) is unknown. The objectives of this study were to (1) assess the acceptability of co-locating G-PNC at an opioid treatment program and (2) describe the maternal and infant characteristics and outcomes of pregnant women in treatment for OUD who participated in G-PNC and those who did not.MethodsThis was a retrospective cohort study of 71 women (G-PNC n = 15; I-PNC n = 56) who were receiving treatment for OUD from one center and who delivered in 2019. Acceptability was determined by assessing the representativeness of the G-PNC cohorts, examining attendance at sessions, and using responses to a survey completed by G-PNC participants. The receipt of health services and healthcare use, behaviors, and infant health between those who participated in G-PNC and those who received I-PNC were described.ResultsG-PNC was successfully implemented among women with varying backgrounds (e.g., racial, ethnic, marital status) who self-selected into the group. All G-PNC participants reported that they were satisfied to very satisfied with the program. Increased rates of breastfeeding initiation, breastfeeding at hospital discharge, receipt of the Tdap vaccine, and postpartum visit attendance at 1-2 weeks and 4-8 weeks were observed in the G-PNC group compared with the I-PNC group. Fewer G-PNC reported postpartum depression symptomatology.ConclusionFindings suggest that co-located G-PNC at an opioid treatment program is an acceptable model for pregnant women in treatment for OUD and may result in improved outcomes. Findings suggest that co-located group prenatal care at an opioid treatment program is an acceptable model for pregnant women in treatment for opioid use disorder, and may result in improved outcomes compared to individual prenatal care.image
引用
收藏
页码:144 / 151
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Outcomes of Latina Women in CenteringPregnancy Group Prenatal Care Compared With Individual Prenatal Care
    Trudnak, Tara E.
    Arboleda, Elizabeth
    Kirby, Russell S.
    Perrin, Karin
    JOURNAL OF MIDWIFERY & WOMENS HEALTH, 2013, 58 (04) : 396 - 403
  • [2] OUTCOMES OF LATINA WOMEN IN CENTERINGPREGNANCY GROUP PRENATAL CARE COMPARED WITH INDIVIDUAL PRENATAL CARE
    Summers, Lisa
    JOURNAL OF MIDWIFERY & WOMENS HEALTH, 2014, 59 (01) : 106 - 106
  • [3] Impact of Group Prenatal Care on Neonatal Outcomes in Women With Opioid Use Disorder
    Lou, Kristie
    McDowell, Misty
    Slaven, James E.
    Grasch, Jennifer
    Quinney, Sara K.
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2020, 135 : 161S - 161S
  • [4] Prenatal Care Adequacy in Pregnant Patients Treated for Opioid Use Disorder.
    Gao, Zimeng
    Marshall, Lila
    Caveglia, Sarah
    Irvine, Carrie
    Seligman, Neil
    REPRODUCTIVE SCIENCES, 2024, 31 : 161A - 161A
  • [5] Does Group Prenatal Care Affect Satisfaction And Prenatal Care Utilization in Iranian Pregnant Women?
    Jafari, F.
    Eftekhar, H.
    Mohammad, K.
    Fotouhi, A.
    IRANIAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2010, 39 (02) : 52 - 62
  • [6] Internet use by pregnant women during prenatal care
    Giacometti, Carolina Fernandes
    Galfano, Giulia Siqueira
    Wajman, Denis Schapira
    Cordioli, Eduardo
    Beck, Ana Paula Avritscher
    Podgaec, Sergio
    EINSTEIN-SAO PAULO, 2024, 22 : eAO0447
  • [7] Qualitative Comparison of Women's Perspectives on the Functions and Benefits of Group and Individual Prenatal Care
    Heberlein, Emily C.
    Picklesimer, Amy H.
    Billings, Deborah L.
    Covington-Kolb, Sarah
    Farber, Naomi
    Frongillo, Edward A.
    JOURNAL OF MIDWIFERY & WOMENS HEALTH, 2016, 61 (02) : 224 - 234
  • [8] Health Care Experience Among Women Who Completed Group Prenatal Care (CenteringPregnancy) Compared to Individual Prenatal Care Within Military Treatment Facilities
    Fowler, Tara Trudnak
    Aiyelawo, Kimberley Marshall
    Frazier, Chantell
    Holden, Craig
    Dorris, Joseph
    JOURNAL OF PATIENT EXPERIENCE, 2020, 7 (06): : 1234 - 1240
  • [9] Preliminary acceptability, feasibility, and efficacy of a group prenatal care intervention targeting the health of overweight and obese pregnant women in American Samoa
    Hawley, N. L.
    Muasau-Howard, B. T.
    Savusa, K. Faasalele
    Faiai, M.
    Suiaunoa-Scanlon, L.
    Ickovics, J.
    Rosen, R. K.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN BIOLOGY, 2019, 31 (02)
  • [10] Comparing group to individual prenatal care for pregnant people living with HIV
    Duque, A.
    Mckinney, J.
    Shannon, K.
    Peters, M.
    Qian, Q.
    Wu, H.
    Levison, J.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2023, 228 (02) : S784 - S785