Efficient last-mile logistics with service options: A multi-criteria decision-making and optimization methodology

被引:1
|
作者
Pourmohammadreza, Nima [1 ]
Jokar, Mohammad Reza Akbari [1 ]
机构
[1] Sharif Univ Technol, Dept Ind Engn, Tehran, Iran
关键词
Vehicle Routing Problem; Last-mile logistics; Service Options; Normalized Normal; Constraint; Mathematical Programming; Multi-Criteria Decision-Making; VEHICLE-ROUTING PROBLEM; CUSTOMER SATISFACTION; PARCEL LOCKERS; TIME WINDOWS; E-COMMERCE; DELIVERY; PICKUP; CROWD; MODEL;
D O I
10.5267/j.ijiec.2024.2.003
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
The rapid growth of online shopping has intensified the need for cost-effective and efficient delivery systems, posing a significant challenge for businesses worldwide. This study proposes an innovative two-phase methodology that uses a hybrid multi -criteria decision -making (MCDM) approach for efficient last -mile logistics with service options (ELMLSO) such as home delivery, self -pickup, and differently -priced services. This approach aims to streamline last -mile logistics by integrating these service options, resulting in a more comprehensive and effective delivery network that enhances customer satisfaction and maintains a competitive edge. The first phase employs the Ordinal Preference Analysis - Evaluation based on Distance from Average Solution (OPA-EDAS) method to select optimal pickup and delivery centers. The second phase identifies the optimal route using a bi-objective mixed -integer mathematical model, striving to balance cost minimization and customer satisfaction maximization. The Normalized Normal Constraint Method (NNCM) is utilized to solve this model. The application of these methods results in considerable cost savings and improved customer satisfaction, offering valuable insights for managers within the last -mile logistics industry.
引用
收藏
页码:367 / 386
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Last Word in Last-Mile Logistics: A Novel Hybrid Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Model for Ranking Industry 4.0 Technologies
    Veljovic, Milos
    Tadic, Snezana
    Krstic, Mladen
    MATHEMATICS, 2024, 12 (13)
  • [2] A hybrid decomposed fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making model for optimizing parcel lockers location in the last-mile delivery landscape
    Moslem, Sarbast
    Guendogdu, Fatma Kutlu
    Saylam, Serhat
    Pilla, Francesco
    APPLIED SOFT COMPUTING, 2024, 154
  • [3] Towards sustainable last-mile logistics: A decision-making model for complex urban contexts
    Silva, Vasco
    Amaral, Antonio
    Fontes, Tania
    SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND SOCIETY, 2023, 96
  • [4] Multi-criteria optimization and decision-making in radiotherapy
    Breedveld, Sebastiaan
    Craft, David
    van Haveren, Rens
    Heijmen, Ben
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2019, 277 (01) : 1 - 19
  • [5] Multi-criteria Optimal Routing for Last-mile Parcel Delivery
    Chen, Zihao
    Wang, Hao
    Khamis, Alaa
    2022 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SMART MOBILITY (ICSM 2022), 2022, : 21 - 26
  • [6] Multi-Criteria Decision-Making and Robust Optimization Methodology for Generator Sizing of a Microgrid
    Pandey, Shikhar
    Han, Jiayu
    Gurung, Niroj
    Chen, Heng
    Paaso, Esa Aleksi
    Li, Zuyi
    Khodaei, Amin
    IEEE ACCESS, 2021, 9 : 142264 - 142275
  • [7] A NEW LOGARITHM METHODOLOGY OF ADDITIVE WEIGHTS (LMAW) FOR MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION-MAKING: APPLICATION IN LOGISTICS
    Pamucar, Dragan
    Zizovic, Malisa
    Biswas, Sanjib
    Bozanic, Darko
    FACTA UNIVERSITATIS-SERIES MECHANICAL ENGINEERING, 2021, 19 (03) : 361 - 380
  • [8] Multi-Criteria Decision-Making
    Encheva, Sylvia
    MICBE '09: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 10TH WSEAS INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTERS IN BUSINESS AND ECONOMICS, 2009, : 192 - +
  • [9] Decision-making for multi-criteria optimization of process planning
    Arquis E.
    Delolme L.
    Antomarchi A.-L.
    Durieux S.
    Duc E.
    Mechanics and Industry, 2019, 20
  • [10] A systematic review of multi-criteria decision-making applications in reverse logistics
    Rezaei, Jafar
    18TH EURO WORKING GROUP ON TRANSPORTATION, EWGT 2015, 2015, 10 : 766 - 776