The inclusion of uncertainty in circularity transition modeling: A case study on wind turbine blade end-of-life management

被引:2
|
作者
Walzberg, Julien [1 ]
Hanes, Rebecca [1 ]
Ghosh, Tapajyoti [1 ]
Key, Alicia [1 ]
Potter, Kristi [1 ]
Eberle, Annika [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Renewable Energy Lab, 15013 Denver West Pkwy, Golden, CO 80401 USA
关键词
Circular economy; Life cycle assessment; Wind turbine blade recycling; Discrete event simulation; Uncertainty analysis; Monte-Carlo analysis;
D O I
10.1016/j.seta.2023.103569
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The transition to a more circular economy (CE) is complex and hard to predict, including in sustainable energy technologies. Many sources of uncertainty make it challenging to model CE scenarios and their potential benefits. As an example, the high variability in costs and revenues of different recycling options makes future wind turbine blade recycling highly uncertain. To better understand this challenge, the circular economy, life cycle assessment and visualization (CELAVI) framework - a discrete event simulation and life cycle assessment framework - is modified to incorporate uncertainty analysis capabilities. Moreover, a 3-step procedure that covers different aspects of uncertainty in CE studies and includes a Monte-Carlo analysis is proposed. The procedure is tested in a case study on wind turbine blade recycling using CELAVI. Results highlight that grinding and landfilling costs are the most influential parameters for wind power circularity. The model's output coefficients of variation (when input parameter uncertainties are propagated) are between 92% and 384% depending on the indicator. The approach developed in this study may help researchers and decision-makers who study circularity prioritize their data collection effort. Finally, our method contributes to a mounting yet critical body of research: the measurement of uncertainty in circularity transitions.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] End-of-life wind turbine blade management across energy transition: A life cycle analysis
    Alavi, Zahraossadat
    Khalilpour, Kaveh
    Florin, Nick
    Hadigheh, Ali
    Hoadley, Andrew
    RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2025, 213
  • [2] Regional representation of wind stakeholders' end-of-life behaviors and their impact on wind blade circularity
    Walzberg, Julien
    Cooperman, Aubryn
    Watts, Liam
    Eberle, Annika L.
    Carpenter, Alberta
    Heath, Garvin A.
    ISCIENCE, 2022, 25 (08)
  • [3] Wind turbine blade end-of-life options: An economic comparison
    Liu, Pu
    Meng, Fanran
    Barlow, Claire Y.
    RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2022, 180
  • [4] Recycling and recovery of fiber-reinforced polymer composites for end-of-life wind turbine blade management
    Shen, Yafei
    Apraku, Sarkodie Emmanuel
    Zhu, Yupeng
    GREEN CHEMISTRY, 2023, 25 (23) : 9644 - 9658
  • [5] Stiffness assessment of the laminate recovered from end-of-life wind turbine blade
    Pyrzowski, L.
    Sabik, A.
    Kluska, J.
    Zembrzuski, J.
    COMPOSITE STRUCTURES, 2024, 348
  • [6] Wind turbine blade end-of-life options: An eco-audit comparison
    Liu, Pu
    Meng, Fanran
    Barlow, Claire Y.
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2019, 212 : 1268 - 1281
  • [7] Wind turbine blade material in the United States: Quantities, costs, and end-of-life options
    Cooperman, Aubryn
    Eberle, Annika
    Lantz, Eric
    RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2021, 168
  • [8] Selective production of phenol from the end-of-life wind turbine blade through catalytic pyrolysis
    Li, Ji-hong
    Jiang, Hao
    Chen, Wei-wei
    Wu, Ya-chang
    Xu, Ming-xin
    Di, Jin-yi
    Li, Wei
    Lu, Qiang
    FUEL, 2024, 378
  • [9] End-of-life policy considerations for wind turbine blades
    Majewski, Peter
    Florin, Nick
    Jit, Joytishna
    Stewart, Rodney A.
    RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2022, 164
  • [10] Exploring PV circularity by modeling socio-technical dynamics of modules' end-of-life management
    Walzberg, Julien
    Carpenter, Alberta
    Heath, Garvin A.
    2021 IEEE 48TH PHOTOVOLTAIC SPECIALISTS CONFERENCE (PVSC), 2021, : 41 - 43