Comparative study of 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT and 99mTc-MDP SPECT/CT bone imaging for the detection of bone metastases in prostate cancer

被引:2
|
作者
Hu, Xiongjian [1 ]
Cao, Yiming [1 ]
Ji, Bin [1 ]
Zhao, Min [1 ]
Wen, Qiang [1 ]
Chen, Bin [1 ]
机构
[1] Jilin Univ, Dept Nucl Med, China Japan Union Hosp, Changchun, Peoples R China
关键词
F-18-DCFPyL; bone scan; prostate-specific membrane antigen; bone metastasis; prostate cancer; SURVIVAL; PSMA;
D O I
10.3389/fmed.2023.1201977
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
PurposeThis study aimed to compare the diagnostic efficiency of F-18-DCFPyL PET/CT imaging and Tc-99m-MDP SPECT/CT bone imaging for the detection of bone metastases in prostate cancer. MethodsA retrospective analysis was conducted on 31 patients with confirmed prostate cancer between September 2020 and September 2022 at China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University. All patients underwent F-18-DCFPyL PET/CT and Tc-99m-MDP SPECT/CT bone imaging. The gold standard was the pathology or Best Valuable Comparator (BVC) result based on clinical follow-up. Diagnostic performance indicators, including sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV), were analyzed at both the patient and lesion levels. The paired sample chi-square test was used to compare the two imaging methods. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were plotted, and the area under the curve (AUC) was calculated for each method. The AUC values were compared using the Z-test, and a p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. ResultsOf the 31 prostate cancer patients, 18 were diagnosed with bone metastases, with a total of 84 bone metastatic lesions. At the patient level, F-18-DCFPyL PET/CT imaging showed superior diagnostic performance compared to Tc-99m-MDP SPECT/CT bone imaging in all indicators: sensitivity (100% vs. 77.8%, p < 0.01), specificity (92.3% vs. 69.2%, p < 0.05), accuracy (96.8% vs. 74.2%, p < 0.01), PPV (94.7% vs. 77.8%, p < 0.01), and NPV (100% vs. 69.2%, p < 0.01). The AUC values for F-18-DCFPyL PET/CT imaging and Tc-99m-MDP SPECT/CT bone imaging were 0.962 and 0.735 (Z = 2.168, p < 0.05). At the lesion level, F-18-DCFPyL PET/CT imaging showed superior diagnostic performance compared to Tc-99m-MDP SPECT/CT bone imaging in all indicators: sensitivity (97.6% vs. 72.6%, p < 0.01), specificity (95.7% vs. 73.9%, p < 0.01), accuracy (97.2% vs. 72.9%, p < 0.01), PPV (98.8% vs. 91.0%, p < 0.01), and NPV (91.7% vs. 42.5%, p < 0.01). The AUC values for F-18-DCFPyL PET/CT imaging and Tc-99m-MDP SPECT/CT bone imaging were 0.966 and 0.733 (Z = 3.541, p < 0.001). ConclusionCompared with Tc-99m-MDP SPECT/CT bone imaging, F-18-DCFPyL PET/CT imaging demonstrated higher diagnostic efficiency for bone metastases in prostate cancer, and it can more accurately determine the presence of bone metastases. It is an important supplement to imaging examination for prostate cancer patients and has great potential and broad application prospects.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] 18F-NaF-PET/CT and 99mTc-MDP Bone Scintigraphy in the Detection of Bone Metastases in Prostate Cancer
    Langsteger, Werner
    Rezaee, Alireza
    Pirich, Christian
    Beheshti, Mohsen
    SEMINARS IN NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2016, 46 (06) : 491 - 501
  • [2] PSMA-Based Detection of Prostate Cancer Bone Lesions With 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT: A Sensitive Alternative to 99mTc-MDP Bone Scan and Na18F PET/CT?
    Rowe, Steven P.
    Mana-ay, Margarita
    Javadi, Mehrbod S.
    Szabo, Zsolt
    Leal, Jeffrey P.
    Pomper, Martin G.
    Pienta, Kenneth J.
    Ross, Ashley E.
    Gorin, Michael A.
    CLINICAL GENITOURINARY CANCER, 2016, 14 (01) : E115 - E118
  • [3] Comparison of 18F-FDG-PET/CT with 99mTc-MDP bone scintigraphy for the detection of bone metastases in cancer patients
    Ozulker, Tamer
    Kucukoz, Aysun
    Ozulker, Filiz
    Ozpacaci, Tevfik
    NUCLEAR MEDICINE COMMUNICATIONS, 2010, 31 (06) : 597 - 603
  • [4] Detection of bone metastases in patients with cancer: 99mTc-MDP bone scan and 18F-FDG PET/CT.
    Wu, Fengyu
    Jiang, Yan
    Ma, Lei
    Yu, Qian
    Xue, Wei
    Wang, Zhenguang
    BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH-INDIA, 2017, 28 (03): : 1299 - 1304
  • [5] Comparison of 18F-Fluciclovine PET/CT and 99mTc-MDP bone scan in detection of bone metastasis in prostate cancer
    Chen, Bo
    Wei, Peng
    Macapinlac, Homer A.
    Lu, Yang
    NUCLEAR MEDICINE COMMUNICATIONS, 2019, 40 (09) : 940 - 946
  • [6] DETECTION OF BONE METASTASES FROM PROSTATE CANCER: A PROSPECTIVE STUDY OF 99MTC-MDP BONE SCINTIGRAPHY, 18F-FLUOROCHOLINE PET/CT, 18F-FLUORIDE PET/CT COMPARED WITH MRI
    Poulsen, Mads
    Petersen, Henrik
    Hoilund-Carlsen, Poul Flemming
    Jakobsen, Jorn S.
    Gerke, Oke
    Karstoft, Jens
    Walter, Steen
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2012, 187 (04): : E77 - E77
  • [7] Detection of bone metastases from prostate cancer: A prospective study of 99mTc-MDP bone scintigraphy, 18F-Fluorocholine PET/CT, 18F-Fluoride PET/CT compared with MRI
    Poulsen, M. H.
    Petersen, H.
    Hoilund-Carlsen, P. F.
    Jakobsen, J. S.
    Gerke, O.
    Karstoft, J.
    Walter, S.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY SUPPLEMENTS, 2012, 11 (01) : E892 - U877
  • [8] Quantitative 99mTc-MDP SPECT/CT as an alternative to 18F-NaF PET/CT for objective assessment of osteoblastic bone metastases
    Coskun, Nazim
    Cagdas, Berkay
    Yildirim, Nilufer
    HELLENIC JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2022, 25 (02) : 132 - 137
  • [9] Vertebral Hemangiolymphangioma Mimics Bone Metastases on 99mTc-MDP SPECT/CT
    Zhang, Yiqiu
    Li, Beilei
    Shi, Hongcheng
    Cai, Liang
    Hou, Jun
    CLINICAL NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2016, 41 (01) : 76 - 78
  • [10] Spatial colocalization of 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT and 18F-NaF PET/CT within prostate cancer bone metastases
    Harmon, Stephanie
    Mena, Esther
    Czarniecki, Marcin
    Adler, Stephen
    Ton, Anita
    Madan, Ravi
    Gulley, James
    Dahut, William
    Mease, Ronnie
    Pomper, Martin
    Turkbey, Ismail
    Choyke, Peter
    Lindenberg, Maria Liza
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2018, 59