The Online Retailer's Randomized Pricing Strategy to Compete With an Offline Retailer

被引:7
|
作者
Wu, Jianghua [1 ]
Zhao, Chenchen [2 ]
机构
[1] Renmin Univ, Sch Business, Operat Management, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] Renmin Univ, Sch Business, Management Sci, Beijing, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金; 北京市自然科学基金;
关键词
online retailing; channel competition; randomized pricing; price discrimination; online-offline competition; CHANNEL SUPPLY-CHAIN; CUSTOMER BEHAVIOR; CONSUMERS; COORDINATION; PROMOTIONS; DECISIONS; DYNAMICS; FAIRNESS; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1080/10864415.2023.2184239
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Online businesses have become an important sector of the retail industry, generating fierce competition with traditional offline retailers. In light of the growing online retail channels, we have designed a randomized pricing strategy for the online retailer, as the offline retailer's price remains unchanged over an infinite period. This study compares two competing retailers' pricing strategies, profits, consumer surplus, and social welfare, in two different scenarios-one in which the online retailer will implement a randomized pricing strategy, and one in which it will not. Conventional wisdom holds that online retailers possess greater flexibility when it comes to offering online promotions that attract more consumers to buy online at lower prices, negatively impacting offline retailers' profits. Our model suggests that the randomized pricing can also benefit offline retailers and social welfare, but not consumer surplus. We also discuss how consumers' strategic behavior affects retailers' pricing strategies and profits. It has been suggested that online retailers should not consider offline transaction costs when formulating promotion probabilities. Finally, we consider cases in which an offline retailer can adjust its strategy. A price-matching policy can help the offline retailer significantly increase profits, but can also benefit the online retailer when consumers are very patient and the utility discount factor is sufficiently small. An offline retailer can benefit from adding an online store only when the offline transaction costs are sufficiently high.
引用
收藏
页码:210 / 235
页数:26
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] RETAILER REPUTATION AND ONLINE PRICING STRATEGY
    Luo, Wenhong
    Chung, Q. B.
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTER INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2010, 50 (04) : 50 - 56
  • [2] Contract design and order decision of online retailer's sharing surplus demand with offline retailer
    Yu J.
    Wang L.
    Zhou Y.
    Fang H.
    International Journal of Industrial and Systems Engineering, 2024, 47 (02) : 143 - 159
  • [3] Online retailer's optimal financing strategy in an online marketplace
    Yan, Qiang
    Zhuo, Wenyan
    Yu, Chongcong
    ELECTRONIC COMMERCE RESEARCH, 2023, 25 (1) : 125 - 154
  • [4] Online Category Pricing at a Multichannel Grocery Retailer
    Cebollada, Javier
    Chu, Yanlai
    Jiang, Zhiying
    JOURNAL OF INTERACTIVE MARKETING, 2019, 46 : 52 - 69
  • [5] Channel pricing strategy under retailer differentiation
    Fan, Xiaojun
    Chen, Hongmin
    2007 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SERVICE SYSTEMS AND SERVICE MANAGEMENT, VOLS 1-3, 2007, : 839 - +
  • [6] An empirical analysis of determinants of retailer pricing strategy
    Shankar, V
    Bolton, RN
    MARKETING SCIENCE, 2004, 23 (01) : 28 - 49
  • [7] Cooperate "and" compete: coopetition strategy in retailer-supplier relationships
    Kim, Stephen
    Kim, Namwoon
    Pae, Jae H.
    Yip, Leslie
    JOURNAL OF BUSINESS & INDUSTRIAL MARKETING, 2013, 28 (04) : 263 - 275
  • [8] A Dominant Retailer's Optimal Pricing Strategy to Stimulate Upstream Innovation
    Wang, Yaoyu
    Du, Wei
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2013 SUZHOU-SILICON VALLEY-BEIJING INTERNATIONAL INNOVATION CONFERENCE (SIIC): TECHNOLOGY INNOVATION AND DIASPORAS IN A GLOBAL ERA, 2013, : 227 - 233
  • [9] Return compensation strategy of online retailer for online reviews
    Qiu, Zu-meng
    Li, Bang-yi
    RAIRO-OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2024, 58 (03) : 2507 - 2524
  • [10] ADAPTIVE PRICING BY A RETAILER
    PARSONS, LJ
    PRICE, WB
    JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 1972, 9 (02) : 127 - 133