Oncological outcomes in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: the value of PSA density as a preoperative predictive factor

被引:2
|
作者
Dilme, Roser Vives [1 ]
Rivas, Juan Gomez [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Hernandez, Laura Fernandez [1 ]
Sanchez, Irene de la Parra [1 ]
del Hoyo, Rafael Sanchez [4 ]
Romo, Maria Isabel Galante [1 ]
Gonzalez, Enrique Redondo [1 ]
Perez, Jose Luis Senovilla [1 ]
Montarroso, Lorena Fernandez [1 ]
Sierra, Jesus Moreno [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Complutense Madrid, Hosp Clin San Carlos, Dept Urol, C Prof Martin Lagos s-n, Madrid 28040, Spain
[2] Univ Complutense Madrid, Hosp Clin San Carlos, Dept Urol, Madrid, Spain
[3] European Assoc Urol EAU, Young Acad Off YAU, Urotechnol Working Grp, Arnhem, Netherlands
[4] Hosp Clin San Carlos IdISSC, Inst Hlth Res, Inst Invest Sanitaria, Madrid, Spain
关键词
oncological outcomes; prostate cancer; prostate-specific antigen; prostate-specific antigen density; robot-assisted radical prostatectomy; ANTIGEN DENSITY; BIOCHEMICAL RECURRENCE; GLEASON SCORE; INCREASED RISK; CANCER; BIOPSY; STRATIFICATION; PATHOLOGY; FEATURES;
D O I
10.1177/17562872241229250
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Pretreatment assessment of patients diagnosed with localized prostate cancer (PCa) is essential for therapeutic decision-making. Currently available staging systems based on prostate-specific antigen (PSA), Gleason score, and clinical stage allow for determining the prognostic characteristics of these patients. Several studies have evaluated the preoperative use of prostate-specific antigen density (PSAD) as a prognostic factor for further risk stratification. To date, the role of PSAD in this setting is still an object of debate. Objectives: The present analysis aimed to assess the predictive potential of PSAD for adverse oncological outcomes after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) and to compare its accuracy to preoperative PSA (pPSA). Design and methods: We retrospectively reviewed 427 patients diagnosed with localized PCa who underwent RARP at a single institution between January 2015 and January 2020. Generating receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves, calculating areas under the curves (AUCs), and using a linear regression model, we analyzed the association of PSAD and pPSA with postoperative positive surgical margins (PSM), Gleason score >= 7, persistent PSA, and biochemical recurrence (BCR), with a median follow-up of 47 months. Results: PSAD showed a significant association with PSM (p < 0.0001), PSA persistence (p < 0.0001), and Gleason >= 7 (p < 0.0001), without being statistically significant in predicting BCR (p = 0.098). The predictive value of PSAD was comparable to pPSA for outcomes of PSA persistence (AUC 0.727 versus 0.771) and Gleason >= 7 (AUC 0.683 versus 0.649). Conclusion: PSAD is a predictive factor for postoperative oncological outcomes of PSM, Gleason score >= 7, and persistence of PSA. Despite the need for further studies, PSAD could be useful as a prognostic parameter in conjunction with established staging systems.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Surgical and Oncological Outcomes in Patients with a Preoperative PSA Value &lt;4 ng/ml Undergoing Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy
    Zugor, Vahudin
    Labanaris, Apostolos P.
    Bauer, Ricarda M.
    Witt, Jorn H.
    ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 2012, 32 (05) : 2079 - 2083
  • [2] Surgical and Oncological Outcomes in Patients with Preoperative PSA &gt;20 ng/ml Undergoing Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy
    Zugor, Vahudin
    Witt, Jorn H.
    Heidenreich, Axel
    Porres, Daniel
    Labanaris, Apostolos P.
    ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 2012, 32 (05) : 2091 - 2095
  • [3] Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: surgical, oncological, and functional outcomes
    Boylu, Ugur
    Basatac, Cem
    Turan, Turgay
    Onol, Fikret Fatih
    Gumus, Eyup
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2012, 38 (01): : 8 - 13
  • [4] Comparison of oncological and functional outcomes of perineoscopic radical prostatectomy and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy
    Yusuf Arikan
    Mithat Eksi
    Ali Ihsan Tasci
    Updates in Surgery, 2023, 75 : 1027 - 1035
  • [5] Comparison of oncological and functional outcomes of perineoscopic radical prostatectomy and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy
    Arikan, Yusuf
    Eksi, Mithat
    Tasci, Ali Ihsan
    UPDATES IN SURGERY, 2023, 75 (04) : 1027 - 1035
  • [6] Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy versus robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: comparison of oncological outcomes at a single center
    Okegawa, Takatsugu
    Omura, Shota
    Samejima, Mio
    Ninomiya, Naoki
    Taguchi, Satoru
    Nakamura, Yu
    Yamaguchi, Tsuyoshi
    Tambo, Mitsuhiro
    Fukuhara, Hiroshi
    PROSTATE INTERNATIONAL, 2020, 8 (01) : 16 - 21
  • [7] Oncological and Functional Outcomes of Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy in Kidney Transplant Recipients
    Shahait, Mohammed
    Al Majali, Fawaz
    Dobbs, Ryan W.
    Sandberg, Alex
    El-Achkar, Adnan
    El-Fahmawi, Ayah
    Mucksavage, Philip
    Lee, David, I
    JSLS-JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC SURGEONS, 2021, 25 (03)
  • [8] Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: 5-Year Oncological and Biochemical Outcomes
    Liss, Michael A.
    Lusch, Achim
    Morales, Blanca
    Beheshti, Nima
    Skarecky, Douglas
    Narula, Navneet
    Osann, Kathryn
    Ahlering, Thomas E.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2012, 188 (06): : 2205 - 2210
  • [9] Impact of Prostate Size on the Functional and Oncological Outcomes of Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy
    Jaber, Abdel Rahman
    Moschovas, Marcio Covas
    Saikali, Shady
    Gamal, Ahmed
    Perera, Roshane
    Rogers, Travis
    Patel, Ela
    Sandri, Marco
    Tilki, Derya
    Patel, Vipul
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY FOCUS, 2024, 10 (02): : 263 - 270
  • [10] ONCOLOGICAL OUTCOMES OF ROBOT-ASSISTED RADICAL CYSTECTOMY
    Choudhury, Sirazum M.
    Mahesan, Nishanthan M.
    Elhage, Oussama
    Khan, M. Shamim
    Dasgupta, Prokar
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2011, 108 (11) : 1679 - U282