Value of S-Detect combined with multimodal ultrasound in differentiating malignant from benign breast masses

被引:1
|
作者
Li, Na [1 ]
Liu, Wanling [1 ]
Zhan, Yunyun [1 ]
Bi, Yu [1 ]
Wu, Xiabi [1 ]
Peng, Mei [1 ]
机构
[1] Anhui Med Univ, Affiliated Hosp 2, Dept Ultrasound, 678,Furong Rd,Econ & Technol Dev Zone, Hefei, Anhui, Peoples R China
来源
EGYPTIAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE | 2024年 / 55卷 / 01期
关键词
S-Detect; Microvascular flow imaging; Elastography; Multimodal ultrasound; Breast mass; SHEAR-WAVE ELASTOGRAPHY; DIAGNOSTIC PERFORMANCE; WFUMB GUIDELINES; CLINICAL-USE; CANCER; ULTRASONOGRAPHY; COLOR; RECOMMENDATIONS; COMBINATION; ACCURACY;
D O I
10.1186/s43055-023-01183-x
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Background Ultrasonography (US) still has some limitations in the differentiation of benign and malignant breast masses. Therefore, we introduced new technologies such as S-Detect, microvascular flow imaging (MVFI), and strain elastography (SE) into the examination and compared the multimodal method with Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS).Objectives This prospective study aimed to evaluate the value of multimodal diagnostic methods that add S-Detect, MFI, and SR to US in differentiating benign from malignant breast masses.Methods We recruited 186 patients with 189 masses between July 2021 and March 2022. The masses were examined using US, S-Detect, SR, and MFI before biopsy, and the benign and malignant differentiation value of each and their combination were assessed compared with surgical pathology results using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV). Subgroup analysis by lesion size was also performed.Results The respective optimal cutoff values of SR and MFI for differentiating benign from malignant masses were 3.15 and 2.45, respectively, and the sensitivity and specificity were 79.3% and 85.6% and 94.6% and 69.1%, respectively. The multimodal AUC (0.907), sensitivity (97.8%), accuracy (90.5%), PPV (84.9%), and NPV (97.6%) were larger than those of each modality (p < 0.05), regardless of the mass size.Conclusions The diagnostic method of S-Detect combined with multimodal ultrasound can effectively improve the diagnostic efficiency of breast masses and is expected to become a routine examination for breast in future for better evaluation the benign and malignancy of breast masses.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Value of S-Detect combined with multimodal ultrasound in differentiating malignant from benign breast masses
    Na Li
    Wanling Liu
    Yunyun Zhan
    Yu Bi
    Xiabi Wu
    Mei Peng
    Egyptian Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, 55
  • [2] A Review of the Role of the S-Detect Computer-Aided Diagnostic Ultrasound System in the Evaluation of Benign and Malignant Breast and Thyroid Masses
    Zhang, Di
    Jiang, Fan
    Yin, Rui
    Wu, Ge-Ge
    Wei, Qi
    Cui, Xin-Wu
    Zeng, Shu-E
    Ni, Xue-Jun
    Dietrich, Christoph F.
    MEDICAL SCIENCE MONITOR, 2021, 27
  • [3] Value of inversion imaging to diagnosis in differentiating malignant from benign breast masses
    Li, Na
    Hou, Zhongguang
    Wang, Jiajia
    Bi, Yu
    Wu, Xiabi
    Zhan, Yunyun
    Peng, Mei
    BMC MEDICAL IMAGING, 2023, 23 (01)
  • [4] Value of inversion imaging to diagnosis in differentiating malignant from benign breast masses
    Na Li
    Zhongguang Hou
    Jiajia Wang
    Yu Bi
    Xiabi Wu
    Yunyun Zhan
    Mei Peng
    BMC Medical Imaging, 23
  • [5] Diagnosis of Benign and Malignant Breast Nodules by Conventional Ultrasound in Combination with S-Detect Technology and Elastic Imaging
    Xing, Boyuan
    Fu, Chenghui
    Yang, Zishu
    JCPSP-JOURNAL OF THE COLLEGE OF PHYSICIANS AND SURGEONS PAKISTAN, 2024, 34 (10): : 1154 - 1157
  • [6] The value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in differentiating benign from malignant retroperitoneal masses
    Zadeh, Ehsan Safai
    Goerg, Christian
    Prosch, Helmut
    Goerg, Mathis
    Trenker, Corinna
    Westhoff, Christina Carolin
    Huber, Katharina
    Pochepnia, Svitlana
    Weber, Michael
    Dietrich, Christoph Frank
    Raab, Nils
    Alhyari, Amjad
    Findeisen, Hajo
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2024, 178
  • [7] Palpable breast masses:: comparison of ultrasound and mammography in differentiating malignant and benign origin
    Tarján, Z
    Tóth, G
    Kerpel-Fróniusz, A
    Galgóczy, H
    Dömötöri, Z
    Járay, B
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1998, 85 : 148 - 148
  • [8] The value of S-Detect for the differential diagnosis of breast masses on ultrasound: a systematic review and pooled meta-analysis
    Li, Jun
    Sang, Tian
    Yu, Wen-Hui
    Jiang, Meng
    Hunag, Shu-Yan
    Cao, Chun-Li
    Chen, Ming
    Cao, Yu-Wen
    Cui, Xin-Wu
    Dietrich, Christoph F.
    MEDICAL ULTRASONOGRAPHY, 2020, 22 (02) : 211 - 219
  • [9] Diagnostic Performance of Multimodal Sound Touch Elastography for Differentiating Benign and Malignant Breast Masses
    Dong, Fajin
    Wu, Huaiyu
    Zhang, Lei
    Tian, Hongtian
    Liang, Weiyu
    Ye, Xiuyin
    Liu, Yan
    Xu, Jinfeng
    JOURNAL OF ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE, 2019, 38 (08) : 2181 - 2190
  • [10] The diagnostic value of multimodal imaging based on MR combined with ultrasound in benign and malignant breast diseases
    Bai, Dong
    Zhou, Nan
    Liu, Xiaofei
    Liang, Yuanzi
    Lu, Xiaojun
    Wang, Jiajun
    Liang, Lei
    Wang, Zhiqun
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE, 2024, 24 (01)