Passengers' Perception of Acoustic Environment in the Airport Terminal: A Case Study of Tianjin Binhai International Airport

被引:1
|
作者
Liu, Mengjin [1 ]
Gao, Zhibin [2 ]
Chang, Fei [2 ]
Zhao, Wei [2 ]
Wang, Junquan [2 ]
Ma, Hui [1 ]
Wang, Chao [1 ]
机构
[1] Tianjin Univ, Sch Architecture, Tianjin 300072, Peoples R China
[2] Tianjin Binhai Int Airport, Tianjin 300072, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
airport terminals; acoustic environment; subjective assessment; on-site measurement; NOISE; IMPACT;
D O I
10.3390/buildings13102585
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
This paper aims to investigate passengers' perception of the acoustic environment in airport terminals. Airport terminals typically consist of several interconnected large spaces and have a noisy environment in China. A questionnaire survey was conducted among 221 passengers at the T2 terminal of Tianjin Binhai International Airport in China to explore their perception and attitude towards the acoustic environment. On-site measurements were also taken to obtain the noise levels in different areas. The results show that the sound pressure levels vary periodically, ranging from 60.7 dB(A) to 79.1 dB(A) across different areas. The acoustic environment lacks eventfulness and pleasantness, with nearly two-thirds of respondents expressing dissatisfaction. Public announcement is generally perceived as the loudest but most preferred sound, while other audible sources are given varying degrees of negative attitudes. The perceived loudness of aircraft and footstep sounds is not high, but their absence significantly improves overall evaluations. Furthermore, age influences the perceived vitality of the acoustic environment. This study is important for the improvement in the indoor environment of the terminal building and the satisfaction of passengers.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Study on influencing factors of atmospheric NO2 and O3 in Tianjin Binhai International Airport
    天津机场区域大气NO2及O3影响因子研究
    Han, Bo (hanbo@live.com), 1600, Chinese Society for Environmental Sciences (40): : 2398 - 2408
  • [2] Content Analysis of Passengers' Perceptions of Airport Service Quality: The Case of Honolulu International Airport
    Bae, Wonmi
    Chi, Junwook
    JOURNAL OF RISK AND FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT, 2022, 15 (01)
  • [3] Effects of vegetation management on the composition and diversity of the insect community at Tianjin Binhai International Airport, China
    Zhao, Shulan
    Li, Zhifei
    Duo, Lian
    BULLETIN OF ENTOMOLOGICAL RESEARCH, 2021, 111 (05) : 553 - 559
  • [4] The effects of the servicescape of airport transfer amenities on the behavioral intentions of transfer passengers: A case study on Incheon International Airport
    Park, Kyuseon
    Park, Jin-Woo
    JOURNAL OF AIR TRANSPORT MANAGEMENT, 2018, 72 : 68 - 76
  • [5] Passengers perceptions of airport branding strategies: The case of Tom Jobim International Airport - RIOgaleao, Brazil
    Figueiredo, Tathiana
    Castro, Rafael
    JOURNAL OF AIR TRANSPORT MANAGEMENT, 2019, 74 : 13 - 19
  • [6] Modelling passengers' activity choice in airport terminal before the security checkpoint: the case of Portela airport in Lisbon
    Kalakou, Sofia
    Moura, Filipe
    18TH EURO WORKING GROUP ON TRANSPORTATION, EWGT 2015, 2015, 10 : 881 - 890
  • [7] Questioning airport expansion - A case study of Canberra International Airport
    May, Murray
    Hill, Stuart B.
    JOURNAL OF TRANSPORT GEOGRAPHY, 2006, 14 (06) : 437 - 450
  • [8] Passenger Perception on Terminal Building Facilitation at Bandaranaike International Airport
    Dayarathna, H. C. G.
    Perera, K. P. D. Frank
    Fernando, W. W. A. S.
    2017 3RD INTERNATIONAL MORATUWA ENGINEERING RESEARCH CONFERENCE (MERCON), 2017, : 165 - 169
  • [9] Southampton International Airport terminal
    Rushton, J.A.
    Structural engineer London, 1996, 74 (04): : 53 - 60
  • [10] A study of ambient fine particles at Tianjin International Airport, China
    Ren, Jianlin
    Liu, Junjie
    Li, Fei
    Cao, Xiaodong
    Ren, Shengxiong
    Xu, Bin
    Zhu, Yifang
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2016, 556 : 126 - 135