Laparoscopic approach for the treatment of acute complications after appendectomy: a systematic review

被引:2
|
作者
Weber, Gabriel [1 ]
Harriott, Camila Bras [1 ]
Casas, Maria A. [1 ]
Sadava, Emmanuel E. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Hosp Aleman Buenos Aires, Dept Surg, Buenos Aires, Argentina
[2] Hosp Aleman Buenos Aires, Dept Surg, 1640 Pueyrredon Ave, Buenos Aires, Argentina
来源
MINERVA SURGERY | 2023年 / 78卷 / 04期
关键词
Laparoscopy; Appendicitis; Abdominal abscess; Appendectomy; Postoperative complications;
D O I
10.23736/S2724-5691.22.09835-5
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
INTRODUCTION: The significance of laparoscopy after appendectomy is still unclear, despite the fact that it is thought to be an appropriate technique for the detection and management of postoperative complications. We aimed to determine the incidence, risk factors, diagnosis, and laparoscopic approach for the treatment of acute complications after appendectomy performing a systematic review of the literature.EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: We performed systematic review of the PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase and GoogleScholar bibliographic databases between 1995 and 2022 regarding laparoscopic resolution of early postoperative complications after appendectomy. Demographics, peri-operative variables, and postoperative outcomes were analyzed.EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: A total of 9 studies comprising 116 cases of laparoscopic resolution of early complications after appendectomy were included. The primary surgery showed a 60% of perforated or gangrenous appendicitis. Time elapse between the appendectomy and the diagnosis of the postoperative complication was from 2 to 15 days (median 5.8 days). The procedures performed at laparoscopy were as follows: laparoscopic washout and drainage of generalized peritonitis and intra-abdominal abscesses (95.6%), laparoscopic lysis of adhesions due to small bowel obstruction (1.7%), running suturing for unnoticed small bowel lesion (1.7%) and one patient required a right colectomy due to stump leakage (0.8%). Conversion to an open approach was necessary in 9 patients (7.8%). Postoperative complications after early re-laparoscopy washout were reported in 4 publications (15.5%). Finally, 15 (12.9%) patients required an additional intervention. The mean LOS was of 5 days.CONCLUSIONS: Infectious complications are not uncommon after appendectomy, but their incidence increases significantly in complicated appendicitis, with IAA being the most feared complication. When re-exploration is mandatory, the laparoscopic approach is a safe and highly effective tool for the diagnosis and treatment of these complications, adding the benefits of minimally invasive surgery.
引用
收藏
页码:433 / 438
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Laparoscopic appendectomy versus antibiotic treatment for acute appendicitis—a systematic review
    Franziska Köhler
    Anne Hendricks
    Carolin Kastner
    Sophie Müller
    Kevin Boerner
    Johanna C. Wagner
    Johan F. Lock
    Armin Wiegering
    International Journal of Colorectal Disease, 2021, 36 : 2283 - 2286
  • [2] Laparoscopic appendectomy versus antibiotic treatment for acute appendicitis-a systematic review
    Koehler, Franziska
    Hendricks, Anne
    Kastner, Carolin
    Mueller, Sophie
    Boerner, Kevin
    Wagner, Johanna C.
    Lock, Johan F.
    Wiegering, Armin
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2021, 36 (10) : 2283 - 2286
  • [3] Prevention and treatment of complications of laparoscopic appendectomy
    Lippert, H
    Manger, T
    EFFICIENCY AND ECONOMICS OF CLINICAL CARE AND RESEARCH IN SURGERY, 1997, SUPPL : 932 - 934
  • [4] Transvaginal Laparoscopic Appendectomy: A Systematic Review
    Slouha, Ethan
    Biput, Stefan J.
    Krumbach, Brandon
    Clunes, Lucy A.
    Kollias, Theofanis F.
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2024, 16 (01)
  • [5] Re-laparoscopy for the treatment of complications after laparoscopic appendectomy: is it possible to maintain the minimally invasive approach?
    Casas, Maria A.
    Laxague, Francisco
    Schlottmann, Francisco
    Sadava, Emmanuel Ezequiel
    UPDATES IN SURGERY, 2021, 73 (06) : 2199 - 2204
  • [6] Re-laparoscopy for the treatment of complications after laparoscopic appendectomy: is it possible to maintain the minimally invasive approach?
    María A. Casas
    Francisco Laxague
    Francisco Schlottmann
    Emmanuel Ezequiel Sadava
    Updates in Surgery, 2021, 73 : 2199 - 2204
  • [7] Varying negative appendectomy rates after laparoscopic appendectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Siri R. Henriksen
    Camilla Christophersen
    Jacob Rosenberg
    Siv Fonnes
    Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery, 408
  • [8] Varying negative appendectomy rates after laparoscopic appendectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Henriksen, Siri R.
    Christophersen, Camilla
    Rosenberg, Jacob
    Fonnes, Siv
    LANGENBECKS ARCHIVES OF SURGERY, 2023, 408 (01)
  • [9] Reporting of complications after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a systematic review
    Alexander, Harry C.
    Bartlett, Adam S.
    Wells, Cameron I.
    Hannam, Jacqueline A.
    Moore, Matthew R.
    Poole, Garth H.
    Merry, Alan F.
    HPB, 2018, 20 (09) : 786 - 794
  • [10] Needlescopic versus laparoscopic appendectomy: a systematic review
    Sajid, Muhammad Shafique
    Khan, Munir Ahmad
    Cheek, Elizabeth
    Baig, Mirza Khurrum
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2009, 52 (02) : 129 - 134