The Outcome of Laparoscopic Versus Open Appendectomy in Childhood

被引:1
|
作者
Rolle, Udo [1 ,10 ]
Bechstein, Wolf O. [2 ]
Fahlenbrach, Claus [3 ]
Heller, Gunther [4 ]
Meyer, Hans -Joachim [5 ]
Schuler, Ekkehard [6 ]
Stier, Albrecht [7 ]
Waibel, Beate [8 ]
Jeschke, Elke [9 ]
Guenster, Christian [9 ]
Maneck, Matthias [9 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Frankfurt Main, Dept Pediat Surg & Pediat Urol, Frankfurt, Germany
[2] Univ Hosp Frankfurt Main, Dept Gen Visceral Transplantat & Thorac Surg, Frankfurt, Germany
[3] AOK Fed Assoc, Berlin, Germany
[4] Inst Qual Assurance & Transparency Healthcare IQTI, Berlin, Germany
[5] German Soc Surg DGCH, Berlin, Germany
[6] Div Qual Management, Helios Klin, Berlin, Germany
[7] HELIOS Hosp Erfurt, Dept Gen & Visceral Surg, Erfurt, Germany
[8] Hlth Insurance Fund Baden Wurttemberg, Med Serv, Freiburg, Germany
[9] AOK Res Inst WIdO, Berlin, Germany
[10] Klin Kinderchirurg & Kinderurol, Univ Klinikum Frankfurt Main, Theodor Stern Kai 7, D-60590 Frankfurt, Germany
来源
DEUTSCHES ARZTEBLATT INTERNATIONAL | 2024年 / 121卷 / 02期
关键词
COMPLICATED APPENDICITIS; NATIONWIDE COHORT; CHILDREN;
D O I
10.3238/arztebl.m2023.0234
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Appendectomy in children is performed either lapa roscopically (LA) or by open surgery (OA). We studied whether, and how, the outcome is affected by the technique used and by the intraoperative conversion of LA to OA. Methods: We analyzed routine data from children and adolescents in three age groups (1-5 years, 6-12 years, and 13-17 years) who were insured by the AOK statutory health insurance carrier in Germany and who underwent appendectomy in the period 2017-2019. General surgical complications and reoperations within 90 days were assessed with relevant indicators. Associations between the surgical technique and these indicators were studied with logistic regression. Results: Of the 21 541 patients included in the study, general surgical complications were observed in 2.1% and reoperations in 1.8% overall. Broken down by age group, the corresponding figures were 5.4% and 4.4% (age 1 to 5), 2.5% and 1.8% (age 6 to 12), and 1.5% and 1.6% (age 13 to 17). The main risk factors for complications and reoperations were acute complicated appendicitis and conversion from LA to OA. Regression analysis revealed similar outcomes with OA compared to LA in the 1 -to -5 age group, (odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals: 1.1 [0.6; 2.1] for general surgical complications and 1.5 [0.8; 2.7] for reoperations), but worse outcomes with OA in the other two age groups (age 6 to 12: 1.9 [1.2; 2.9] and 2.1 [1.5; 2.9]; age 13 to 17: 1.7 [1.0; 2.9] and 2.2 [1.4; 3.6]). When conversions were assigned to the LA group, the odds ratio (OA compared to LA) for reoperation across all age groups was 3.5 [2.8; 4.4] in patients with acute uncomplicated appendicitis and 4.2 [3.4; 5.3] in patients with complicated appendicitis. Complicated appendicitis also increased the rate of general surgical complications and the length of stay in hospital. Conclusion: Among children in the two older age groups, LA was followed by fewer general surgical complications and reoperations than OA. These differences were less pronounced when conversions were counted as belonging to the LA group. Children aged 1-5 appear to benefit the least from the lapa roscopic technique.
引用
收藏
页码:39 / 44
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: A comparison of primary outcome measures
    Khalil, Jawad
    Muqim, Roohul
    Rafique, Mohammad
    Khan, Mansoor
    SAUDI JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2011, 17 (04): : 236 - 240
  • [2] A clinical outcome and cost analysis of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy
    McCahill, LE
    Pellegrini, CA
    Wiggins, T
    Helton, WS
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1996, 171 (05): : 533 - 537
  • [3] Laparoscopic Versus Open Appendectomy
    Ali, Safiyya M.
    Hassanain, Mazen
    SAUDI JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2011, 17 (04): : 225 - 226
  • [4] Open versus Laparoscopic appendectomy
    Herman, J
    Duda, M
    Lovecek, M
    Svach, I
    HEPATO-GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2003, 50 (53) : 1419 - 1421
  • [5] Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy
    Hotz, TK
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1997, 173 (02): : 150 - 150
  • [6] LAPAROSCOPIC VERSUS OPEN APPENDECTOMY
    MCANENA, OJ
    AUSTIN, O
    HEDERMAN, WP
    GOREY, TF
    FITZPATRICK, J
    OCONNELL, PR
    LANCET, 1991, 338 (8768): : 693 - 693
  • [7] Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy
    Williams, MD
    Collins, JN
    Wright, TF
    Fenoglio, ME
    SOUTHERN MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1996, 89 (07) : 668 - 674
  • [8] LAPAROSCOPIC VERSUS OPEN APPENDECTOMY
    IKARD, RW
    FEDERSPIEL, CF
    NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1995, 333 (13): : 881 - 882
  • [9] Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy
    Merhoff, AM
    Merhoff, GC
    Franklin, ME
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2000, 179 (05): : 375 - 378
  • [10] Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy
    M. Marzouk
    M. Khater
    M. Elsadek
    A. Abdelmoghny
    Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques, 2003, 17 (5): : 721 - 724