Take-up and distribution of a universal cash benefit: The case of the Austrian long-term care allowance

被引:2
|
作者
Pennerstorfer, Astrid [1 ]
Oesterle, August [1 ]
机构
[1] WU Vienna Univ Econ & Business, Vienna, Austria
关键词
cash benefits; discretion; local variation; long-term care; non-take-up; Austria; WELFARE-STATE; OLDER; SERVICES;
D O I
10.1017/S0047279423000375
中图分类号
C93 [管理学]; D035 [国家行政管理]; D523 [行政管理]; D63 [国家行政管理];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ; 1204 ; 120401 ;
摘要
The body of research on the take-up of social benefits is growing, but rarely focuses on universal cash benefits, especially in the field of long-term care. This paper is concerned with the long-term care (LTC) allowance in Austria, a universal cash benefit paid to those in need of LTC on seven different levels of dependency. It investigates whether take-up and distribution of the benefit reflect need in terms of age structure and health status of the population, and examines whether local variations in the distribution of benefits can be explained with socio-demographic variables. Combining administrative data on recipients and socio-demographic data on the municipal level with health information shows that higher levels of education and a higher share of foreigners are associated with a lower share of recipients, while a lower average household size increases the share of recipients. Overall, these variations are much stronger for lower levels of care needs than for higher ones. The results suggest variations in take-up that are determined either by non-application (in particular among lower levels of care needs) or discretion and potentially discrimination in the process of claiming the benefit.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The take-up of cash assistance among private kinship care families
    Sheran, Michelle
    Swann, Christopher A.
    CHILDREN AND YOUTH SERVICES REVIEW, 2007, 29 (08) : 973 - 987
  • [2] The non-take up of long-term care benefit in France: A pecuniary motive?
    Arrighi, Yves
    Davin, Berengere
    Trannoy, Alain
    Ventelou, Bruno
    HEALTH POLICY, 2015, 119 (10) : 1338 - 1348
  • [4] Cash benefits in long-term home care
    van den Berg, Bernard
    Hassink, Wolter H. J.
    HEALTH POLICY, 2008, 88 (2-3) : 209 - 221
  • [5] Consumer Numeracy and Insurance Design Decisions: An Examination of Inflation Protection Take-Up Among Private Long-Term Care Insurance Policy Holders
    McGarry, Brian E.
    Grabowski, David C.
    MEDICAL CARE RESEARCH AND REVIEW, 2020, 77 (02) : 187 - 195
  • [6] CARE OR CASH? TAIWAN'S LONG-TERM CARE IN CROSSROADS
    Wang, P.
    GERONTOLOGIST, 2011, 51 : 350 - 351
  • [7] Issues of patient care: Long-term care vs. long-term benefit.
    Kaufer, DI
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GERIATRIC PSYCHIATRY, 2002, 10 (02): : 6 - 7
  • [8] CHARACTERISTICS OF VETERANS RECEIVING CASH BENEFITS FOR LONG-TERM CARE
    Thomas, K. S.
    GERONTOLOGIST, 2015, 55 : 289 - 290
  • [9] UAW CREATES PILOT LONG-TERM CARE BENEFIT
    DROSTE, T
    HOSPITALS, 1987, 61 (23): : 59 - 60
  • [10] Brushing Up on Mouth Care in Long-Term Care
    不详
    JOURNAL OF THE CANADIAN DENTAL ASSOCIATION, 2012, 78