Earthquake-induced loss assessment of hybrid self-centering piston-based braced frame with friction springs and SMA bars

被引:6
作者
Rahgozar, Navid [1 ]
Alam, M. Shahria [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ British Columbia, Sch Engn, Appl Lab Adv Mat & Struct ALAMS, Kelowna, BC V1V 1V7, Canada
[2] Univ British Columbia, Sch Engn, Chair Resilient & Green Infrastruct, EME 4211, Kelowna, BC V1V 1V7, Canada
关键词
Self-centering Piston-based brace; Friction springs; SMA bars; Buckling restrained brace; Expected financial loss; Irreparable loss; Repair loss; BRACING SYSTEM; SHAPE; BEHAVIOR;
D O I
10.1016/j.engstruct.2024.117731
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
A novel Self-Centering Piston-Based Bracing (SC-PBB), integrating Friction Springs (FSs) and Shape Memory Alloy (SMA) bars, offers a promising solution for curtailing seismic damage in braced frame structures. Nevertheless, this hybrid SC-PBB may incur higher construction costs compared to conventional bracing archetypes. Accordingly, it is imperative to investigate whether the initial cost increase can be offset over the structure's lifespan. This study quantifies earthquake-induced financial losses in braced frames equipped with SC-PBBs (SCPBBFs) compared to those equipped with Buckling-Restrained Bracings (BRBs). A building-specific PerformanceBased Earthquake Engineering (PBEE) framework is employed to evaluate potential economic losses under farfield ground motions. The analysis quantifies total, collapse, irreparable, and repair losses by incorporating seismic hazards, structural demands, and damage consequences. Results reveal higher total and collapse losses for BRBFs, although their lower repair costs for non-structural components mitigate repair loss. Additionally, the low-rise SC-PBBF archetype could recoup initial construction expenses over its expected lifespan, unlike its BRBF counterpart.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 55 条
  • [1] American Institute of Steel Construction, 2010, 36010 ANSIAISC
  • [2] American Society of Civil Engineers, 2016, 716 ASCESEI
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2009, FEMA P695
  • [4] Spectral shape, epsilon and record selection
    Baker, Jack W.
    Cornell, C. Allin
    [J]. EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING & STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS, 2006, 35 (09) : 1077 - 1095
  • [5] Seismic-resistant self-centering rocking core system with buckling restrained columns
    Blebo, Felix C.
    Roke, David A.
    [J]. ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2018, 173 : 372 - 382
  • [6] Bradley B.A., 2009, Ph.D. thesis
  • [7] Self-centering energy dissipative bracing system for the seismic resistance of structures: Development and validation
    Christopoulos, C.
    Tremblay, R.
    Kim, H. -J.
    Lacerte, M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING, 2008, 134 (01) : 96 - 107
  • [8] Christopoulos C., 2022, Resilient Cities and Structures, V1:, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.RCNS.2022.03.005
  • [9] Cornell CA, 2000, PEER Center News, P2000
  • [10] Federal Emergency Management Agency, 2018, P581 FEMA, V1