Identifying Patients in Whom the Follow-Up Scheme after Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy Could Be Optimized in the First Year after Surgery: Reducing Healthcare Burden

被引:0
|
作者
Veerman, Hans [1 ,2 ,3 ]
van der Graaf, Sophia H. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Meijer, Dennie [2 ,3 ]
Hagens, Marinus J. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Tillier, Corinne N. [1 ,3 ]
van Leeuwen, Pim J. [1 ,3 ]
van der Poel, Henk G. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Vis, Andre N. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Antoni Leeuwenhoek Hosp, Netherlands Canc Inst, Dept Urol, NL-1066 CX Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Univ Amsterdam, Med Ctr, Dept Urol, NL-1066 CX Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Prostate Canc Network Netherlands, NL-1066 CX Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
prostatic neoplasms; prostatectomy; prostate-specific antigen; follow-up; aftercare; recurrence; delivery of healthcare; EARLY SALVAGE RADIOTHERAPY; CANCER; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.3390/biomedicines11030727
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Background: The currently advised follow-up scheme of PSA testing after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) is strict and might pose a burden to our healthcare system. We aimed to optimize the 1-year follow-up scheme for patients who undergo RARP. Methods: All patients with histologically-proven prostate cancer (PCa) who underwent RARP between 2018 and August 2022 in the Prostate Cancer Network in the Netherlands were retrospectively evaluated. We excluded patients who underwent salvage RARP and patients who had <1 year of PSA follow-up. Postoperative PSA values were collected. Biochemical persistence (BCP) was defined as PSA level >0.10 ng/mL at 0-4 months after RARP, whereas biochemical recurrence (BCR) was defined as PSA level >0.2 ng/mL at any time point after RARP. We aimed to identify a group of patients who had a very low risk of BCR at different time points after surgery. Results: Of all 1155 patients, BCP was observed in 151 (13%), of whom 79 (6.8%) had PSA >= 0.2 ng/mL. BCR further developed in 51 (4.7%) and 37 (3.4%) patients at 5-8 and 9-12 months after RARP, respectively. In 12 patients, BCR was found at 5-8 months after RARP in the absence of BCP. These patients represented 1.2% (12/1004) of the entire group. In other words, 98.8% (992/1004) of patients who had an unmeasurable PSA level at 0-4 months after RARP also had an unmeasurable PSA level 5-8 months after surgery. Limitations are the retrospective design and incomplete follow-up. Conclusions: Patients with an unmeasurable PSA level at 3-4 months after RARP may not need to be retested until 12 months of follow-up, as almost 100% of patients will not have the biochemically recurrent disease at 5-8 months of follow-up. This will reduce PSA testing substantially at the cost of hardly any missed patients with recurrent disease.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] ROBOT-ASSISTED LAPAROSCOPIC RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY: ASSESSMENT OF QUALITY OF LIFE AFTER ONE YEAR FOLLOW-UP
    Beato, Alessandra
    Annino, Filippo
    Sighinolfi, Maria Chiara
    De Came, Cosimo
    Micali, Salvatore
    De Stefani, Stefano
    Bianchi, Giampaolo
    ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 2010, 30 (04) : 1462 - 1463
  • [2] Oncological outcomes after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: long-term follow-up in 4803 patients
    Sukumar, Shyam
    Rogers, Craig G.
    Quoc Dien Trinh
    Sammon, Jesse
    Sood, Akshay
    Stricker, Hans
    Peabody, James O.
    Menon, Mani
    Diaz-Insua, Mireya
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2014, 114 (06) : 824 - 831
  • [3] Biochemical outcomes after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in patients with follow-up more than 5-years
    Kim, Kwang Hyun
    Lim, Sey Kiat
    Shin, Tae-Young
    Chung, Byung Ha
    Hong, Sung Joon
    Rha, Koon Ho
    ASIAN JOURNAL OF ANDROLOGY, 2013, 15 (03) : 404 - 408
  • [4] Changes of lower urinary tract function after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: An urodynamic follow-up within 1 year
    Jiang, Yuan-Hong
    Kuo, Hann-Chorng
    TZU CHI MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2023, 35 (02): : 158 - 164
  • [5] Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy After Previous Prostate Surgery
    Tugcu, Volkan
    Atar, Arda
    Sahin, Selcuk
    Kargi, Taner
    Seker, Kamil Gokhan
    IlkerComez, Yusuf
    IhsanTasci, Ali
    JSLS-JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC SURGEONS, 2015, 19 (04)
  • [6] Quality of life outcomes after robot assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: 3 Year follow-up
    Dinlenc, C
    Berman, A
    Wagner, J
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2005, 173 (04): : 7 - 7
  • [7] PATTERNS OF BIOCHEMICAL RECURRENCE AFTER ROBOT-ASSISTED RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY. RESULTS OF PATIENTS WITH A MINIMUM FOLLOW-UP OF 5 YEARS
    Suardi, N.
    Willemsen, P.
    Pauwels, E.
    De Wil, P.
    De Naeyer, G.
    Schatteman, P.
    Carpentier, P.
    Mottrie, A. M.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY SUPPLEMENTS, 2011, 10 (02) : 154 - 154
  • [8] Radical retropubic prostatectomy: The first Russian experience of 15-year follow-up after surgery
    Veliev, E. I.
    Petrov, S. B.
    Loran, O. B.
    Sokolov, E. A.
    Seregin, A. V.
    Lukyanov, I. V.
    ONKOUROLOGIYA, 2013, 9 (02): : 57 - 62
  • [9] Robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy after previous cancer surgery
    Kim K.H.
    Lorenzo E.I.S.
    Jeong W.
    Oh C.K.
    Yu H.S.
    Rha K.H.
    Journal of Robotic Surgery, 2010, 3 (4) : 223 - 227
  • [10] Long-term follow-up of patients undergoing percutaneous suprapubic tube drainage after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP)
    Sammon, Jesse D.
    Trinh, Quoc-Dien
    Sukumar, Shyam
    Diaz, Mireya
    Simone, Andrea
    Kaul, Sanjeev
    Menon, Mani
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2012, 110 (04) : 580 - 585