Vacuum extraction or caesarean section in the second stage of labour: A systematic review

被引:5
|
作者
Thierens, Stephanie [1 ,2 ,9 ]
van Binsbergen, Annelien [1 ,3 ]
Nolens, Barbara [4 ]
van den Akker, Thomas [5 ,6 ]
Bloemenkamp, Kitty [7 ]
Rijken, Marcus J. [1 ,8 ]
机构
[1] Univ Med Ctr Utrecht, Utrecht Univ, Julius Ctr Hlth Sci & Primary Care, Julius Global Hlth, Utrecht, Netherlands
[2] Spaarne Gasthuis, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Haarlem, Netherlands
[3] Bernhoven Hosp, Dept Surg, Bernhoven, Netherlands
[4] Canisius Wilhelmina Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Nijmegen, Netherlands
[5] Leiden Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Med Ctr, Leiden, Netherlands
[6] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Athena Inst, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[7] WKZ Birth Ctr Univ, Utrecht Univ, Dept Obstet, Div Women & Baby,Med Ctr Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
[8] Univ Amsterdam, Dept Obstet, Med Ctr, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[9] Univ Med Ctr Utrecht, Julius Ctr Hlth Sci & Primary Care, Julius Global Hlth, Heidelberglaan 100, NL-3584 CX Utrecht, Netherlands
关键词
caesarean section; maternal; morbidity; mortality; neonatal; operative vaginal delivery; perinatal; vacuum extraction; PERINATAL OUTCOMES; NEONATAL OUTCOMES; VAGINAL DELIVERY; GLOBAL BURDEN; PREVENTION; BIRTH; INSTRUMENT; MANAGEMENT; MORTALITY; FISTULA;
D O I
10.1111/1471-0528.17394
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Background: Prolonged second stage of labour is an important cause of maternal and perinatal morbidity and mortality. Vacuum extraction (VE) and second- stage caesarean section (SSCS) are the most commonly performed obstetric interventions, but the procedure chosen varies widely globally. Objectives: To compare maternal and perinatal morbidity, mortality and other ad-verse outcomes after VE versus SSCS.Search Strategy: A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Cochrane and EMBASE. Studies were critically appraised using the Newcastle- Ottawa scale. Selection Criteria: All artictles including women in second stage of labour, giving birth by vacuum extraction or cesarean section and registering at least one perinatal or maternal outcome were selected.Data Collection and Analysis: The chi-square test, Fisher exact's test and binary logistic regression were used and various adverse outcome scores were calculated to evaluate maternal and perinatal outcomes.Main Results: Fifteen articles were included, providing the outcomes for a total of 20 051 births by SSCS and 32 823 births by VE. All five maternal deaths resulted from complications of anaesthesia during SSCS. In total, 133 perinatal deaths occurred in all studies combined: 92/20 051 (0.45%) in the SSCS group and 41/32 823 (0.12%) in the VE group. In studies with more than one perinatal death, both conducted in low-resource settings, more perinatal deaths occurred during the decision- to- birth interval in the SSCS group than in the VE group (5.5% vs 1.4%, OR 4.00, 95% CI 1.17- 13.70; 11% vs 8.4%, OR 1.39, 95% CI 0.85- 2.26). All other adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes showed no statistically significant differences.Conclusions: Vacuum extraction should be the recommended mode of birth, both in high-income countries and in low-and middle-income countries, to prevent un-necessary SSCS and to reduce perinatal and maternal deaths when safe anaesthesia and surgery is not immediately available.
引用
收藏
页码:586 / 598
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Women's recommendations: vacuum extraction or caesarean section for prolonged second stage of labour, a prospective cohort study in Uganda
    Nolens, Barbara
    van den Akker, Thomas
    Lule, John
    Twinomuhangi, Sulphine
    van Roosmalen, Jos
    Byamugisha, Josaphat
    TROPICAL MEDICINE & INTERNATIONAL HEALTH, 2019, 24 (05) : 553 - 562
  • [2] Caesarean section in the second stage of labour: A retrospective review of obstetric setting and morbidity
    McKelvey, A.
    Ashe, R.
    McKenna, D.
    Roberts, R.
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2010, 30 (03) : 264 - 267
  • [3] Caesarean section in the second stage of labour as a risk factor for cervical incompetence
    Eisenberg, K.
    Tan, I
    Fewings, I
    Roberson, M.
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2015, 122 : 169 - 170
  • [4] Reverse breech extraction in cases of second stage caesarean section
    Schwake, D.
    Petchenkin, L.
    Younis, J. S.
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2012, 32 (06) : 548 - 551
  • [5] Vaginal delivery after previous caesarean section for failure of second stage of labour
    Jongen, VHWM
    Halfwerk, MGC
    Brouwer, WK
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1998, 105 (10): : 1079 - 1081
  • [6] Ultrasound during the second stage of labour: is it effective to reduce the caesarean section rates?
    Hinkson, Larry
    Araujo Junior, Edward
    Moron, Antonio Fernandes
    REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE GINECOLOGIA E OBSTETRICIA, 2015, 37 (06): : 249 - 251
  • [7] Caesarean section at second stage: a retrospective review of indications and morbidity
    Adebayo, O.
    Elkhatib, D.
    Brandon, H.
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2013, 120 : 78 - 78
  • [8] Cephalic extraction versus breech extraction in second-stage caesarean section: a retrospective study
    Ezra, O.
    Lahav-Ezra, H.
    Meyer, R.
    Cahan, T.
    Ilan, H.
    Mazaki-Tovi, S.
    Sivan, E.
    Barzilay, E.
    Haas, J.
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2020, 127 (12) : 1568 - 1574
  • [9] Accidental delivery through a vaginal incision (laparoelytrotomy) during caesarean section in the second stage of labour
    Peleg, D
    Perlitz, Y
    Pansky, S
    Levit, A
    Ben-Ami, M
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2001, 108 (06): : 659 - 660
  • [10] Caesarean delivery in the second stage of labour - Revisit the past
    Ryan, Dermot
    BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2006, 333 (7571): : 753 - 754