Comparison of Conventional Dose Versus Superdose Platelet-Rich Plasma for Knee Osteoarthritis: A Prospective, Triple-Blind, Randomized Clinical Trial

被引:13
|
作者
Patel, Sandeep [1 ,3 ]
Gahlaut, Shivam [1 ]
Thami, Tarkik [1 ]
Chouhan, Devendra Kumar [1 ]
Jain, Ashish [2 ]
Dhillon, Mandeep Singh [1 ]
机构
[1] Post Grad Inst Med Educ & Res PGIMER, Dept Orthoped Surg, Chandigarh, India
[2] Post Grad Inst Med Educ & Res PGIMER, Dept Transfus Med, Chandigarh, India
[3] Post Grad Inst Med Educ & Res PGIMER, Dept Orthoped Surg, Sect 12, Chandigarh 160012, India
关键词
knee; osteoarthritis; platelet-rich plasma; superdose platelet-rich plasma; HYALURONIC-ACID; INJECTIONS; PLACEBO; DEGENERATION; PATHOLOGY; SINGLE;
D O I
10.1177/23259671241227863
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Confusion persists regarding the ideal dosage of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injection for knee osteoarthritis (OA). Purpose/Hypothesis: The purpose of the study was to compare the efficacy of 2 different single-injection PRP dosages in patients with early knee OA-a conventional 4 mL dose and a superdose of 8 mL. It was hypothesized that 8 mL of PRP would be superior to 4 mL of PRP in this patient population. Study Design: Randomized clinical trial; Level of evidence, 1. Methods: Patients with early knee OA (Kellgren-Lawrence grades 1 and 2) who met the inclusion criteria were randomly divided into 2 groups: Group A (n = 50 knees) received a 4-mL PRP injection, and group B (n = 49 knees) received an 8-mL PRP injection, both prepared using the same procedure. Patients were evaluated at the baseline, 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months using the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC), the WOMAC-Pain subscale, the visual analog scale for pain, the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, and patient satisfaction, and results were compared between the groups. Results: The baseline characteristics of the 2 groups were comparable (group A: mean age, 51.96 +/- 6.93 years; group B: mean age, 49.12 +/- 9.8 3 years). Leucocyte-depleted PRP with 3.5 times concentration (final product platelet concentration, 706.74 x 103-mu L) was injected. The mean absolute platelet count injected was 2.82 +/- 0.0012 billion in group A and 5.65 +/- 0.0022 billion in group B. All patient-reported outcome scores improved significantly in both groups from the baseline to the final follow-up (P < .001), with overall trends and results significantly better in group B than in group A (P < .001). Patient satisfaction at the 6-month follow-up was also better in group B (96%) compared with group A (68%). Short (2 to 7 days) self-limiting complications, such as pain and stiffness, occurred more often in group B (P < .001). Conclusion: Patients with early knee OA had significantly better improvement in pain and function when treated with an 8-mL injection of PRP compared with a 4-mL injection of PRP. The larger dose of PRP had approximately twice the number of platelets.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison of Conventional Dose Versus Superdose Platelet-Rich Plasma for Knee Osteoarthritis: Response
    Patel, Sandeep
    Thami, Tarkik
    Gahlaut, Shivam
    Chouhan, Devendra
    Dhillon, Mandeep Singh
    ORTHOPAEDIC JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2024, 12 (06)
  • [3] Effect of single injection of platelet-rich plasma in comparison with corticosteroid on knee osteoarthritis: a double-blind randomized clinical trial
    Forogh, Bijan
    Mianehsaz, Elaheh
    Shoaee, Shervan
    Ahadi, Tannaz
    Raissi, Gholam R.
    Sajadi, Simin
    JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE AND PHYSICAL FITNESS, 2016, 56 (7-8): : 901 - 908
  • [4] The Clinical Efficacy of Platelet-Rich Plasma versus Conventional Drug Injection in the Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis: A Study Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial
    Ma, Qi
    Hei, Xiaoyan
    Zhu, Shiqiang
    Tian, Xinbao
    Chen, Yundong
    Zhu, Ning
    Zhang, Jinchen
    Feng, Ping
    Liu, Yujuan
    Xing, Lijuan
    Li, Xiaojun
    Liu, Qiang
    Li, Fengqiao
    Li, Xiaolong
    Lai, Zheying
    Lin, Ruizhu
    Xu, Jianfeng
    EVIDENCE-BASED COMPLEMENTARY AND ALTERNATIVE MEDICINE, 2022, 2022
  • [5] Platelet-rich plasma versus corticosteroid injection for treatment of trigger finger: study protocol for a prospective randomized triple-blind placebo-controlled trial
    Aspinen, Samuli
    Nordback, Panu H.
    Anttila, Turkka
    Stjernberg-Salmela, Susanna
    Ryhanen, Jorma
    Kosola, Jussi
    TRIALS, 2020, 21 (01)
  • [6] Platelet-rich plasma versus corticosteroid injection for treatment of trigger finger: study protocol for a prospective randomized triple-blind placebo-controlled trial
    Samuli Aspinen
    Panu H. Nordback
    Turkka Anttila
    Susanna Stjernberg-Salmela
    Jorma Ryhänen
    Jussi Kosola
    Trials, 21
  • [7] PLATELET-RICH PLASMA AND PLASMA FOR TREATMENT OF KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS: A DOUBLE-BLIND PLACEBO-CONTROLLED RANDOMIZED CLINICAL TRIAL
    Dorio, M.
    Pereira, R. M.
    Oliveira, R. M.
    Luz, A. G.
    Fuller, R.
    OSTEOARTHRITIS AND CARTILAGE, 2019, 27 : S481 - S482
  • [8] Platelet-Rich Plasma Versus Microfragmented Adipose Tissue for Knee Osteoarthritis: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Baria, Michael
    Pedroza, Angela
    Kaeding, Christopher
    Durgam, Sushmitha
    Duerr, Robert
    Flanigan, David
    Borchers, James
    Magnussen, Robert
    ORTHOPAEDIC JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2022, 10 (09)
  • [9] Protocol for a multicentre randomised triple-blind controlled trial assessing the clinical efficacy of intra-articular platelet-rich plasma injections versus placebo in symptomatic knee osteoarthritis (PIKOA)
    Eymard, Florent
    Oubaya, Nadia
    Ornetti, Paul
    Sellam, Jeremie
    Richette, Pascal
    Chevalier, Xavier
    BMJ OPEN, 2024, 14 (11):
  • [10] Treatment With Platelet-Rich Plasma Is More Effective Than Placebo for Knee Osteoarthritis A Prospective, Double-Blind, Randomized Trial
    Patel, Sandeep
    Dhillon, Mandeep S.
    Aggarwal, Sameer
    Marwaha, Neelam
    Jain, Ashish
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2013, 41 (02): : 356 - 364