Exploring the Preferences of the Australian Public for Antibiotic Treatments: A Discrete Choice Experiment

被引:1
|
作者
Degeling, Chris [1 ]
Yarwood, Trent [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Nettel-Aguirre, Alberto [5 ]
Mullan, Judy [6 ]
Reynolds, Nina [7 ]
Chen, Gang [8 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wollongong, Australian Ctr Hlth Engagement Evidence & Values, Wollongong, NSW 2522, Australia
[2] Cairns & Hinterland Hosp & Hlth Serv, Cairns, Qld, Australia
[3] James Cook Univ, Coll Med & Dent, Cairns Clin Sch, Townsville, Australia
[4] Univ Queensland, Fac Med, Rural Clin Sch, Brisbane, Australia
[5] Univ Wollongong, Ctr Hlth & Social Analyt, NIASRA, Wollongong, NSW 2522, Australia
[6] Univ Wollongong, Fac Sci Med & Hlth, Grad Sch Med, Wollongong, NSW, Australia
[7] Univ Wollongong, Fac Business & Law, Sch Business, Wollongong, NSW, Australia
[8] Monash Univ, Ctr Hlth Econ, Monash Business Sch, Melbourne, Australia
来源
关键词
NATIONAL PROGRAM; CARE; KNOWLEDGE; ATTITUDES; BELIEFS; MODELS;
D O I
10.1007/s40271-023-00640-z
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
ObjectivesIdentify Australian public preferences for antibiotic treatments in the context of antibiotic stewardship.MethodsA discrete choice experiment (DCE) was conducted in Australia to investigate the importance of seven attributes associated with antibiotic treatments and related stewardship practices: contribution to antimicrobial resistance (AMR), treatment duration, side effects, days needed to recover, days before taking antibiotics, treatment failure and out-of-pocket costs. The DCE data were analysed using conditional logit, mixed logit and latent class conditional logit models. The relative importance of each attribute was calculated.ResultsA total of 1882 respondents completed the survey; the main study sample consist of 1658 respondents (mean age 48 years) who passed quality checks. All seven attributes significantly influenced respondents' preferences for antibiotic treatments. Based on the designed attribute levels in the DCE, on average, out-of-pocket costs (32.8%) and contribution to antibiotic resistance (30.3%) were the most important attributes, followed by side effects (12.9%). Days before starting medication was least important (3.9%). Three latent classes were identified. Class 1 (including respondents who were more likely to be older and more health literate; 24.5%) gave contribution to antibiotic resistance greater importance in treatment preferences. Class 2 (including respondents more likely to report poorer health; 25.2%) gave out-of-pocket costs greater importance. The remaining (50.4%), who were generally healthier, perceived side effects as the most important attribute.ConclusionsDespite concerted public awareness raising campaigns, our results suggest that several factors may influence the preferences of Australians when considering antibiotic use. However, for those more likely to be aware of the need to preserve antibiotics, out-of-pocket costs and limiting the contribution to antibiotic resistance are the dominant influence. Delays in starting treatment were not important for any latent class, suggesting public tolerance for this measure. These results could help inform strategies to promote prudent antibiotic stewardship.
引用
收藏
页码:555 / 567
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Exploring the Preferences of the Australian Public for Antibiotic Treatments: A Discrete Choice Experiment
    Chris Degeling
    Trent Yarwood
    Alberto Nettel-Aguirre
    Judy Mullan
    Nina Reynolds
    Gang Chen
    The Patient - Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, 2023, 16 : 555 - 567
  • [2] Patient Preferences for Hemophilia a Treatments: A Discrete Choice Experiment
    Sun, Shawn X.
    Zhao, Jing
    Yang, Hongbo
    Wu, Eric
    BLOOD, 2020, 136
  • [3] PREFERENCES FOR HEMOPHILIA TREATMENTS IN CANADA: A DISCRETE CHOICE EXPERIMENT (DCE)
    Johnston, K.
    Stoffman, J.
    Mickle, A.
    Olatunde, S.
    Klaassen, R. J.
    Diles, D.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2022, 25 (01) : S193 - S193
  • [4] Patient and caregiver preferences for haemophilia A treatments: A discrete choice experiment
    Su, Jun
    Li, Nanxin
    Joshi, Namita
    Ng, Xinyi
    Botteman, Marc
    Shah, Rachel
    Jain, Nisha
    Lyn, Nicole
    Preblick, Ronald
    HAEMOPHILIA, 2020, 26 (06) : E291 - E299
  • [5] Patient preferences for atopic dermatitis treatments: a discrete choice experiment
    Kwatra, Shawn G.
    Lio, Peter
    Weidinger, Stephan
    Calimlim, Brian
    Ladizinski, Barry
    Vigna, Namita
    Botha, Willings
    Mansfield, Carol
    JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGICAL TREATMENT, 2023, 34 (01)
  • [6] Patient preferences for topical psoriasis treatments: a discrete choice experiment
    Hoelker, Suna
    Ninosu, Nadia
    Buettner, Sylvia
    Peitsch, Wiebke K.
    Schaarschmidt, Marthe-Lisa
    JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGICAL TREATMENT, 2022, 33 (05) : 2595 - 2604
  • [7] Preferences regarding antibiotic treatment and the role of antibiotic resistance: A discrete choice experiment
    Ancillotti, M.
    Eriksson, S.
    Andersson, D., I
    Godskesen, T.
    Fahlquist, J. Nihlen
    Veldwijk, J.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS, 2020, 56 (06)
  • [8] Preferences of the Public for Sharing Health Data: Discrete Choice Experiment
    Johansson, Jennifer Viberg
    Bentzen, Heidi Beate
    Shah, Nisha
    Haraldsdottir, Eik
    Jonsdottir, Guobjorg Andrea
    Kaye, Jane
    Mascalzoni, Deborah
    Veldwijk, Jorien
    JMIR MEDICAL INFORMATICS, 2021, 9 (07)
  • [9] The Australian public's preferences for emergency care alternatives and the influence of the presenting context: a discrete choice experiment
    Harris, Paul
    Whitty, Jennifer A.
    Kendall, Elizabeth
    Ratcliffe, Julie
    Wilson, Andrew
    Littlejohns, Peter
    Scuffham, Paul A.
    BMJ OPEN, 2015, 5 (04):
  • [10] Patient preferences for pilonidal sinus treatments: A discrete choice experiment survey
    Wickramasekera, Nyantara
    Strong, Emily
    Shackley, Philip
    Callaghan, Tia
    Lee, Matthew
    Hind, Daniel
    Brown, Steven
    COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2023, 25 (05) : 984 - 994