Exploring and understanding perceived relationships between doctoral students and their supervisors in China

被引:3
|
作者
Xu, Yanru [1 ]
Liu, Ji'an [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Sch Publ Policy & Management, Beijing 100049, Peoples R China
来源
关键词
PERSON-ORGANIZATION; FIT; ATTRITION; AUTHORITY; KNOWLEDGE; EDUCATION;
D O I
10.1057/s41599-023-02360-z
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
Fit in supervisory relationships is crucial for doctoral students' outcomes, where supervisory relationships are influenced by cultural and disciplinary contexts. This article qualitatively explores fit or misfit between students' perceptions and those of their supervisors on supervisory relationships in STEM in the cultural context of Chinese Confucianism. Considered through the lens of person-supervisor fit, two dimensions, consisting of four distinctions of supervisor-doctoral student fit or misfit in supervisory relationships, are identified: (1) a conceptual dimension consisting of supplementary fit or misfit; and (2) a practical dimension consisting of complementary fit or misfit. Supplementary fit is illustrated through three conceptual congruences regarding the nature of doctoral learning, students' dispositions and the modelling and nurturing roles of supervisors. The term supplementary misfit refers to a conceptual incongruence regarding supervisors' familial roles, which demonstrates contradictions between sustained cultural influences and the present-day academic profession. Complementary fit includes needs-supplies fit and demands-abilities fit, which bear disciplinary characteristics in modern STEM doctoral education. Complementary misfit refers to supervisors' strict practices as against students' demands for autonomy. This article advances the application of the person-supervisor fit perspective in STEM doctoral supervision and contributes to the understanding of disciplinary and cultural influences on the present-day academic supervisory relationships in China.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Exploring and understanding perceived relationships between doctoral students and their supervisors in China
    Yanru Xu
    Ji’an Liu
    Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 10
  • [2] Supervisors were first students: Analysing supervisors? perceptions as doctoral students versus doctoral supervisors
    Gonzalez-Ocampo, Gabriela
    Castello, Montserrat
    INNOVATIONS IN EDUCATION AND TEACHING INTERNATIONAL, 2019, 56 (06) : 711 - 725
  • [3] DOCTORAL STUDENTS AND THE SUPERVISORS ROLE
    DUDLEY, HAF
    BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1984, 288 (6416): : 511 - 511
  • [4] Understanding doctoral supervisors' understanding of supervisory goals in China: a social-cultural interpretation
    Xu, Yanru
    Liu, Ji'an
    HIGHER EDUCATION, 2025,
  • [5] The role of gratitude in enhancing the relationship between doctoral research students and their supervisors
    Howells, Kerry
    Stafford, Karen
    Guijt, Rosanne
    Breadmore, Michael
    TEACHING IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2017, 22 (06) : 621 - 638
  • [6] The Role of Supervisors in Light of the Experience of Doctoral Students
    Begin, Christian
    Gerard, Laetitia
    POLICY FUTURES IN EDUCATION, 2013, 11 (03): : 267 - 276
  • [7] Exploring Perceived Mattering in Physical Education Teacher Education Doctoral Students
    Schulz, Denis
    Gaudreault, Karen Lux
    Richards, Kevin Andrew
    Shiver, Victoria N.
    Simonton, Kelly L.
    JOURNAL OF TEACHING IN PHYSICAL EDUCATION, 2024,
  • [8] Information sharing between doctoral students and supervisors: fixed roles and flexible attitudes
    Janiuniene, Erika
    Maceviciute, Elena
    INFORMATION RESEARCH-AN INTERNATIONAL ELECTRONIC JOURNAL, 2016, 21 (04):
  • [9] Co-authorship between doctoral students and supervisors: motivations, reservations, and challenges
    Wang, Jiayu
    Liardet, Cassi
    Lum, Juliet
    Riazi, Mehdi
    HIGHER EDUCATION RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT, 2024, 43 (07) : 1615 - 1631
  • [10] Exploring the professional development of online and distance doctoral supervisors
    Huet, Isabel
    Casanova, Diogo
    INNOVATIONS IN EDUCATION AND TEACHING INTERNATIONAL, 2021, 58 (04) : 430 - 440