Calibration and simulation of a silicon dosemeter for ambient dose equivalent in low-earth orbit space

被引:1
|
作者
Youn, Sukwon [1 ,2 ]
Nam, Uk-won [3 ]
Kim, Sunghwan [4 ]
Kim, Hongjoo [5 ]
Park, Won-Kee [3 ]
Sohn, Jongdae [3 ]
Moon, Bongkon [3 ]
Jun, Insoo [6 ]
Ye, Sung-Joon [1 ,2 ,7 ,8 ]
机构
[1] Seoul Natl Univ, Dept Appl Bioengn, Seoul 08826, South Korea
[2] Seoul Natl Univ, Rese Inst Convergence Sci, Grad Sch Convergence Sci & Technol, Seoul 08826, South Korea
[3] Korea Astron & Space Sci Inst, Space Sci Div, Daejeon 34055, South Korea
[4] Cheongju Univ, Dept Radiol Sci, Cheongju 28503, South Korea
[5] Kyungpook Natl Univ, Dept Phys, Daegu 41566, South Korea
[6] CALTECH, Jet Propuls Lab, Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
[7] Seoul Natl Univ, Adv Inst Convergence Technol, Suwon 16229, South Korea
[8] Seoul Natl Univ Hosp, Biomed Res Inst, Seoul 03080, South Korea
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
COSMIC-RADIATION; ENERGY; FACILITY; LIULIN; FIELD; ISS;
D O I
10.1093/rpd/ncad226
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
A particle dosemeter (PD) is a payload of NEXTSat-2 in the low-earth orbit (LEO). The absorbed dose in LEO needs to be converted into the ambient dose equivalent (H*(10)). Due to a mixed field in LEO, the calibration factors (k(low) and k(high)) should be determined for the low-and high-linear energy transfers (LET) (below and above 1.5 keV/mu m), respectively. The PD was irradiated with a Cs-137 source at the Korea Radiation Solution facility to obtain H*(10) and absorbed doses. However due to the lack of sources for the high-LET calibration, H*(10) and an absorbed dose were calculated by simulating PD for the high-energy neutron field at CERN-EU high-energy Reference Field. The measured k(low) of PD had a difference of 5.1% and 9.5% from the calculated value of PD and the measured value of Liulin detectors, respectively. However, a difference in k(high) between PD and Liulin was explained by the contribution of non-neutron components to Liulin in the measurements.
引用
收藏
页码:2118 / 2125
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Space debris in low-Earth orbit
    Nelson, TL
    SPACE 98, 1998, : 804 - 808
  • [2] Space Occupancy in Low-Earth Orbit
    Bombardelli, Claudio
    Falco, Gabriele
    Amato, Davide
    Rosengren, Aaron J.
    JOURNAL OF GUIDANCE CONTROL AND DYNAMICS, 2021, 44 (04) : 684 - 700
  • [3] Magnetically levitated space elevator to low-earth orbit
    Hull, JR
    Mulcahy, TM
    Niemann, RC
    ADVANCES IN CRYOGENIC ENGINEERING, VOL 47, PTS A AND B, 2002, 613 : 1711 - 1718
  • [4] Space radiation dosimetry in low-Earth orbit and beyond
    Benton, ER
    Benton, E
    NUCLEAR INSTRUMENTS & METHODS IN PHYSICS RESEARCH SECTION B-BEAM INTERACTIONS WITH MATERIALS AND ATOMS, 2001, 184 (1-2): : 255 - 294
  • [5] Commercializing Low-Earth Orbit and the Role of the International Space Station
    Gatens, Robyn
    2016 IEEE AEROSPACE CONFERENCE, 2016,
  • [6] LAUNCH VEHICLES TO LOW-EARTH ORBIT
    RUPPE, HO
    SPACE POLICY, 1987, 3 (03) : 175 - 178
  • [7] Influence of Low-Earth Orbit Exposure on the Mechanical Properties of Silicon Carbide
    Witkin, David B.
    Palusinski, Iwona A.
    MATERIAL TECHNOLOGIES AND APPLICATIONS TO OPTICS, STRUCTURES, COMPONENTS, AND SUB-SYSTEMS, 2013, 8837
  • [8] Coherent Communications for Free Space Optical Low-Earth Orbit Downlinks
    Matuz, Balazs
    Zahr, Ayman
    Sauter, Alexander
    2022 IEEE GLOBAL COMMUNICATIONS CONFERENCE (GLOBECOM 2022), 2022, : 5911 - 5916
  • [9] The radiation environment in low-earth orbit
    Badhwar, GD
    RADIATION RESEARCH, 1997, 148 (05) : S3 - S10
  • [10] Efficiency of a radiophotoluminescence glass dosemeter for low-earth-orbit space radiation
    Yasuda, H
    Fujitaka, K
    RADIATION PROTECTION DOSIMETRY, 2002, 100 (1-4) : 545 - 548