产业结构变化与生产率增长——基于中国国民经济分门类行业的实证检验

被引：3

作者：

周永文

机构：

[1] 暨南大学产业经济研究院

来源：

暨南学报(哲学社会科学版) | 2017年 / 39卷 / 04期

基金：

国家自然科学基金重点项目;

关键词：

产业结构变化; 劳动生产率; 资本生产率; 全要素生产率; 结构红利;

D O I：

暂无

中图分类号：

F121.3 [产业结构]; F249.22 [劳动生产率];

学科分类号：

0201 ; 020105 ; 020207 ; 1202 ; 120202 ; 020106 ;

摘要：

劳动结构变化对劳动生产率具有明显的"结构红利"特征,但其"结构红利"呈现下降趋势;资本结构变化对资本生产率的改善作用则呈现前低后高的特点,2008年后已由"结构负利"转为"结构红利";要素投入特别是资本投入仍然是中国经济增长的主要来源,全要素生产率增长经历了一个先上升后下降的过程;劳动转移效应对经济增长和全要素生产率的改善作用强于资本转移效应,二者呈现出此消彼长的趋势。

引用

页码：1 / 17+130 +130

页数：18

共 24 条

[1]

Structural change and transformation of growth regime in the Japanese economy.[J].Hiroshi Nishi.Evolutionary and Institutional Economics Review.2016, 1

[2] Deconstructing the BRICs: Structural transformation and aggregate productivity growth [J].

de Vries, Gaaitzen J. ;

Erumban, Abdul A. ;

Timmer, Marcel P. ;

Voskoboynikov, Ilya ;

Wu, Harry X. .

JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE ECONOMICS, 2012, 40 (02) :211-227

[3]

Structural change and growth in India.[J].Orcan Cortuk;Nirvikar Singh.Economics Letters.2010, 3

[4]

Long-run sectoral development.[J].Andreas Dietrich;Jens J. Krüger.Structural Change and Economic Dynamics.2009, 2

[5]

Institutional enforcement; labor-market rigidities; and economic performance.[J].Cesar Calderon;Alberto Chong;Gianmarco Leon.Emerging Markets Review.2006, 1

[6]

Chapter 9 Accounting for Cross-Country Income Differences.[J].Francesco Caselli.Handbook of Economic Growth.2005,

[7]

Technological progress; structural change and productivity growth in the manufacturing sector of South Korea.[J].Lakhwinder Singh.World Review of Science; Technology and Sustainable Development.2004, 1

[8]

Productivity growth in Asian manufacturing: the structural bonus hypothesis examined.[J].Marcel P Timmer;Adam Szirmai.Structural Change and Economic Dynamics.2000, 4

[9]

Productivity growth in Asian manufacturing: the structural bonus hypothesis examined.[J].Marcel P Timmer;Adam Szirmai.Structural Change and Economic Dynamics.2000, 4

[10] A vision of the growth process [J].

Harberger, AC .

AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 1998, 88 (01) :1-32

← 1 2 3 →