Simultaneous portal and hepatic vein embolization is better than portal embolization or ALPPS for hypertrophy of future liver remnant before major hepatectomy: A systematic review and network meta-analysis

被引:0
|
作者
Paschalis Gavriilidis [1 ]
Gabriele Marangoni [1 ]
Jawad Ahmad [1 ]
Daniel Azoulay [2 ]
机构
[1] Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, University Hospitals of Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust
[2] Department of Hepato-Biliary and Liver Transplantation Surgery, Paul Brousse University Hospital, Paris-Saclay University
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R657.3 [肝及肝管];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100210 ;
摘要
Background: Post-hepatectomy liver failure(PHLF) is the Achilles’ heel of hepatic resection for colorectal liver metastases. The most commonly used procedure to generate hypertrophy of the functional liver remnant(FLR) is portal vein embolization(PVE), which does not always lead to successful hypertrophy. Associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy(ALPPS) has been proposed to overcome the limitations of PVE. Liver venous deprivation(LVD), a technique that includes simultaneous portal and hepatic vein embolization, has also been proposed as an alternative to ALPPS. The present study aimed to conduct a systematic review as the first network meta-analysis to compare the efficacy, effectiveness, and safety of the three regenerative techniques. Data sources: A systematic search for literature was conducted using the electronic databases Embase, Pub Med(MEDLINE), Google Scholar and Cochrane. Results: The time to operation was significantly shorter in the ALPPS cohort than in the PVE and LVD cohorts by 27 and 22 days, respectively. Intraoperative parameters of blood loss and the Pringle maneuver demonstrated non-significant differences between the PVE and LVD cohorts. There was evidence of a significantly higher FLR hypertrophy rate in the ALPPS cohort when compared to the PVE cohort, but non-significant differences were observed when compared to the LVD cohort. Notably, the LVD cohort demonstrated a significantly better FLR/body weight(BW) ratio compared to both the ALPPS and PVE cohorts. Both the PVE and LVD cohorts demonstrated significantly lower major morbidity rates compared to the ALPPS cohort. The LVD cohort also demonstrated a significantly lower 90-day mortality rate compared to both the PVE and ALPPS cohorts. Conclusions: LVD in adequately selected patients may induce adequate and profound FLR hypertrophy before major hepatectomy. Present evidence demonstrated significantly lower major morbidity and mortality rates in the LVD cohort than in the ALPPS and PVE cohorts.
引用
收藏
页码:221 / 227
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Simultaneous portal and hepatic vein embolization is better than portal embolization or ALPPS for hypertrophy of future liver remnant before major hepatectomy: A systematic review and network meta-analysis
    Gavriilidis, Paschalis
    Marangoni, Gabriele
    Ahmad, Jawad
    Azoulay, Daniel
    HEPATOBILIARY & PANCREATIC DISEASES INTERNATIONAL, 2023, 22 (03) : 221 - 227
  • [2] Portal vein ligation versus portal vein embolization for induction of hypertrophy of the future liver remnant: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Isfordink, C. J.
    Samim, M.
    Braat, M. N. G. J. A.
    Almalki, A. M.
    Hagendoorn, J.
    Rinkes, I. H. M. Borel
    Molenaar, I. Q.
    SURGICAL ONCOLOGY-OXFORD, 2017, 26 (03): : 257 - 267
  • [3] Simultaneous Portal and Hepatic Vein Embolization achieves better liver hypertrophy and resectability than Portal Vein Embolization alone
    Heil, Jan
    Korenblik, Remon
    Heid, Franziska
    Binkert, Christoph
    Breitenstein, Stefan
    Guiu, Boris
    Hertl, Martin
    Neumann, Ulf P.
    Schnitzbauer, Andreas
    Van der Leij, Christiaan
    Van Dam, Ron
    Schadde, Erik
    SWISS MEDICAL WEEKLY, 2021, 151 : 13 - 13
  • [4] Portal vein embolization versus dual vein embolization for management of the future liver remnant in patients undergoing major hepatectomy: meta-analysis
    Bell, Richard J.
    Hakeem, Abdul R.
    Pandanaboyana, Sanjay
    Davidson, Brian R.
    Prasad, Raj K.
    Dasari, Bobby V. M.
    BJS OPEN, 2022, 6 (06):
  • [5] Radiological Simultaneous Portohepatic Vein Embolization (RASPE) Before Major Hepatectomy A Better Way to Optimize Liver Hypertrophy Compared to Portal Vein Embolization
    Laurent, Christophe
    Fernandez, Benjamin
    Marichez, Arthur
    Adam, Jean-Philippe
    Papadopoulos, Panteleimon
    Lapuyade, Bruno
    Chiche, Laurence
    ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2020, 272 (02) : 199 - 205
  • [6] Comment on: Portal vein embolization versus dual vein embolization for management of the future liver remnant in patients undergoing major hepatectomy: meta-analysis
    Oweira, Hani
    Krimi, Bassem
    Gouader, Amine
    Seiller, Ian
    Chaouch, Mohamed Ali
    BJS OPEN, 2024, 8 (04):
  • [7] Simultaneous portal and hepatic vein embolization before major liver resection
    Heil, Jan
    Schadde, Erik
    LANGENBECKS ARCHIVES OF SURGERY, 2021, 406 (05) : 1295 - 1305
  • [8] Comment on: Radiological Simultaneous Portohepatic Vein Embolization (RASPE) Before Major Hepatectomy A Better Way to Optimize Liver Hypertrophy Compared to Portal Vein Embolization
    Stavrou, Gregor A.
    Gharbi, Akram
    Ross, Steffen
    Spuentrup, Elmar
    ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2021, 274 (06) : E876 - E878
  • [9] Simultaneous portal and hepatic vein embolization before major liver resection
    Jan Heil
    Erik Schadde
    Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery, 2021, 406 : 1295 - 1305
  • [10] Comparison of portal vein embolization, portal vein ligation, associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy in cases with a small future liver remnant: a network meta-analysis
    Huang, Hanchun
    Liu, Wenjun
    Wang, Anqiang
    Bian, Jin
    Wang, Shanshan
    Wu, Liangcai
    Lin, Jianzhen
    Xu, Yiyao
    Sang, Xinting
    Zhao, Haitao
    TRANSLATIONAL CANCER RESEARCH, 2017, 6 (04) : 826 - 833