高等教育“学术漂移”现象的动因探析——基于社会学制度主义的视角

被引：31

作者：

司俊峰

唐玉光

机构：

[1] 华东师范大学高等教育研究所

来源：

高等教育研究 | 2016年 / 37卷 / 09期

关键词：

学术漂移; 社会学制度主义; 制度逻辑;

D O I：

暂无

中图分类号：

G647 [学校管理];

学科分类号：

040106 ;

摘要：

近年来,"学术漂移"在世界高等教育领域内的盛行,引起了学者和高等教育管理者的关注。从社会学制度主义的视角来看,政府的政策导向、社会文化期待和高等教育机构的目标定位,高等教育机构属性中的不确定性,以及教师群体不断提高的职业化与专业化共同推动了"学术漂移"的萌发与泛滥。与此同时,高校组织域内"偏重研究"制度逻辑的存在及其异常稳定的特性,导致遏制"学术漂移"的政策措施几近失效,这也注定了治理"学术漂移"是一项长期而又艰巨的任务。

引用

页码：38 / 44

页数：7

共 9 条

[1] 学校变革困难的新制度主义解释 [J].

柯政 .

北京大学教育评论, 2007, (01) :42-54+189

[2]

Theory development and application in higher education research: the case of academic drift[J] . Malcolm Tight.Journal of Educational Administration and History . 2015 (1)

[3]

Understanding Academic Drift: On the Institutional Dynamics of Higher Technical and Professional Education[J] . Jonathan Harwood.Minerva . 2010 (4)

[4]

Conceptualizing Change in the Institutional Diversity of U.S. Colleges and Universities[J] . Christopher C. Morphew.The Journal of Higher Education . 2009 (3)

[5]

Institutional diversity, program acquisition and faculty members: examining academic drift at a new level[J] . Christopher C Morphew.Higher Education Policy . 1999 (1)

[6]

Centralization and diversity: Evaluating the effects of government policies in U.S.A. and Dutch higher education[J] . Jeroen Huisman,Christopher C. Morphew.Higher Education Policy . 1998 (1)

[7]

Caught in the middle: faculty and institutional status and quality in state comprehensive universities[J] . Bruce B. Henderson,William D. Kane.Higher Education . 1991 (4)

[8] ACADEMIC STAFF AND ACADEMIC DRIFT IN AUSTRALIAN COLLEGES OF ADVANCED EDUCATION [J].

HARMAN, G .

HIGHER EDUCATION, 1977, 6 (03) :313-335

[9]

Institutional Change and Healthcare Organization .2 SCOTT W R,et al. University of Chicago Press . 2000

← 1 →