Comparison of Effects of Recombinant FSH versus Highly Purified Urinary FSH for COH in the Outcome of IVF-ET

被引:3
|
作者
Xian-dong PENG
机构
关键词
highly purified urinary FSH (HP-uFSH); recombinant FSH; IVF outcome;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R446.1 [生物化学检验、临床检验];
学科分类号
100208 ;
摘要
Objective To investigate the difference in the outcome of IVF-ET between the patients using recombinant FSH versus highly purified urinary FSH for controlled ovarian stimulation (COH). Methods A comparative retrospective analysis was performed between the patients undergoing IVF using recombinant FSH (rFSH) 562 cycles (rFSH group) versus using highly purified urinary FSH(uFSH) 555 cycles (uFSH group) for COH from August 2009 to July 2010. Main outcome measures included: duration of stimulation, total amount of FSH, E2 level on hCG injection day, number of oocytes collected, average number of frozen embryos, and the rate of cancellation, implantation, clinical pregnancy and miscarriage rate. Results uFSH group required a significantly higher total amount of FSH and a longer duration of stimulation than thouse rFSH group (19.3 ± 7.6 vs 18.3 ± 7.0 ampoules, P=0.02, and 9.1 ± 1.6 d vs 8.9 ± 1.5 d, P=0.04, respectively). There was no statistically significant difference in the implantation rate, clinical pregnancy rate and miscarriage rate between uFSH and rFSH groups (22.57% vs 20.16%, 38.15% vs 35.18%, and 10.6% vs 13.45%, respectively, P>0.05). The other measures including E2 level on hCG injection day, cancellation, number of oocytes collected, fertilization, average number of frozen embryos showed no difference between the two groups. Conclusion There is no significant difference in the outcome of IVF-ET between two groups in effects of recombinant FSH versus highly purified urinary FSH for COH.
引用
收藏
页码:89 / 94
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison of ovulation induction with rFSH and highly purified urinary FSH (FSH HP) in IVF
    Gomez-Parga, JL
    Garcia, M
    Fernandez, MJ
    Sola, A
    Garcia-Consuegra, JM
    Carracedo, R
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 1999, 14 : 320 - 320
  • [2] Highly purified HMG versus recombinant FSH for ovarian stimulation in IVF cycles
    Platteau, Peter
    Andersen, Anders Nyboe
    Loft, Anne
    Smitz, Johan
    Danglas, Pascal
    Devroey, Paul
    REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE ONLINE, 2008, 17 (02) : 190 - 198
  • [3] A prospective and randomized study of ovarian stimulation for ICSI with recombinant FSH versus highly purified urinary FSH
    Baruffi, R
    Mauri, AL
    Petersen, C
    Contart, P
    Coelho, J
    Ursolino, G
    Franco, JG
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 1999, 14 : 256 - 256
  • [4] A prospective and randomized study of ovarian stimulation for ICSI with recombinant FSH versus highly purified urinary FSH
    Franco, JG
    Baruffi, RLR
    Coelho, J
    Mauri, AL
    Petersen, CG
    Garbellini, E
    GYNECOLOGICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2000, 14 (01) : 5 - 10
  • [5] Initial results from the comparison of recombinant FSH and urinary FSH in an IVF programme
    Manassiev, NA
    Davies, WAR
    Leonard, T
    Pavlovich, B
    Philips, A
    Tenekedjiev, K
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 1997, 12 : R68 - R68
  • [6] Recombinant human FSH versus highly purified urinary FSH:: a randomized study in intrauterine insemination with husbands' spermatozoa
    Matorras, R
    Recio, V
    Corcóstegui, B
    Rodríguez-Escudero, FJ
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2000, 15 (06) : 1231 - 1234
  • [7] Comparison of highly purified urinary versus recombinant FSH: Effect on ART outcomes in polycystic ovary syndrome
    Sohrabvand, Farnaz
    Sheikhhassani, Shahrzad
    Bagheri, Maryam
    Haghollahi, Fedyeh
    Shabihkhani, Maryam
    Shariat, Mamak
    Esfahani, Manijeh Nasr
    IRANIAN JOURNAL OF REPRODUCTIVE MEDICINE, 2012, 10 (03) : 229 - 236
  • [8] Recombinant FSH versus highly purified FSH in intrauterine insemination: systematic review and metaanalysis
    Matorras, Roberto
    Osuna, Carmen
    Exposito, Antonia
    Crisol, Lorena
    Ignacio Pijoan, Jose
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2011, 95 (06) : 1937 - U94
  • [9] Efficacy of ovarian stimulation with combined recombinant and urinary FSH vs. recombinant FSH alone and IVF outcome
    Pacchiarotti, A.
    Mohamed, M. A.
    Selman, H.
    Bezerr, M. S. Espinola
    Antonaci, D.
    Di Fonso, M. G.
    Aragona, C.
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2006, 21 : I128 - I128
  • [10] Clinical experience with recombinant FSH and urinary FSH in 2000 cycles of IVF
    Aurell, R
    Ravhon, A
    Lavery, S
    Margara, R
    Trew, G
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 1999, 14 : 176 - 176