Validity of Chinese Version of the Composite International Diagnostic Interview-3.0 in Psychiatric Settings

被引:1
|
作者
Lu Jin
Huang Yue-Qin
Liu Zhao-Rui
Cao Xiao-Lan
机构
[1] Beijing 100191
[2] China
[3] Ministry of Health (Peking University)
[4] Peking University Institute of Mental Health
[5] Key Laboratory of Mental Health
[6] Peking University Sixth Hospital
关键词
Composite International Diagnostic Interview; Concordance; Mental Disorder; Reliability; Structured Clinical Interview for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders; Fourth Edition Axis I Disorders; Sensitivity; Specificity; Validity;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
Background: The Composite International Diagnostic Interview-3.0 (CIDI-3.0) is a fully structured lay-administered diagnostic interview for the assessment of mental disorders according to ICD-10 and Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition (DSM-IV) criteria. The aim of the study was to investigate the concurrent validity of the Chinese CIDI in diagnosing mental disorders in psychiatric settings.Methods: We recruited 208 participants, of whom 148 were patients from two psychiatric hospitals and 60 healthy people from communities. These participants were administered with CIDI by six trained lay interviewers and the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis I Disorders (SCID-I, gold standard) by two psychiatrists. Agreement between CIDI and SCID-I was assessed with sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value. Individual-level CIDI-SCID diagnostic concordance was evaluated using the area under the receiver operator characteristic curve and Cohen’s K.Results: Substantial to excellent CIDI to SCID concordance was found for any substance use disorder (area under the receiver operator characteristic curve [AUC] = 0.926), any anxiety disorder (AUC = 0.807) and any mood disorder (AUC = 0.806). The concordance between the CIDI and the SCID for psychotic and eating disorders is moderate. However, for individual mental disorders, the CIDI-SCID concordance for bipolar disorders (AUC = 0.55) and anorexia nervosa (AUC = 0.50) was insufficient.Conclusions: Overall, the Chinese version of CIDI-3.0 has acceptable validity in diagnosing the substance use disorder, anxiety disorder and mood disorder among Chinese adult population. However, we should be cautious when using it for bipolar disorders and anorexia nervosa.
引用
收藏
页码:2462 / 2466
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Validity of Chinese Version of the Composite International Diagnostic Interview-3.0 in Psychiatric Settings
    Lu, Jin
    Huang, Yue-Qin
    Liu, Zhao-Rui
    Cao, Xiao-Lan
    CHINESE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2015, 128 (18) : 2462 - 2466
  • [2] Reliability and validity of the Polish language version of the Composite International Diagnostic Interview
    Kantorska-Janiec, M
    Kiejna, A
    Jarosz-Nowak, J
    EUROPEAN PSYCHIATRY, 2004, 19 : 199S - 200S
  • [3] Validity and limitations of the Brazilian version of the Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI 2.1)
    Quintana, Maria Ines
    Gastal, Fabio Leite
    Jorge, Miguel Roberto
    Miranda, Claudio Torres
    Andreoli, Sergio Baxter
    REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE PSIQUIATRIA, 2007, 29 (01) : 18 - 22
  • [4] Validity of the Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI) psychosis module in a psychiatric setting
    Cooper, L
    Peters, L
    Andrews, G
    JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRIC RESEARCH, 1998, 32 (06) : 361 - 368
  • [5] Clinical reappraisal of the Composite International Diagnostic Interview Version 3.0 in the Saudi National Mental Health Survey
    Kessler, Ronald C.
    Al-Desouki, Majid
    King, Andrew J.
    Sampson, Nancy A.
    Al-Subaie, Abdullah S.
    Al-Habeeb, Abdulhameed
    Bilal, Lisa
    Shahab, Mona K.
    Aradati, Maggie
    Altwaijri, Yasmin A.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF METHODS IN PSYCHIATRIC RESEARCH, 2020, 29 (03)
  • [6] PROCEDURAL VALIDITY OF THE COMPUTERIZED VERSION OF THE COMPOSITE INTERNATIONAL DIAGNOSTIC INTERVIEW (CIDI-AUTO) IN THE ANXIETY DISORDERS
    PETERS, L
    ANDREWS, G
    PSYCHOLOGICAL MEDICINE, 1995, 25 (06) : 1269 - 1280
  • [7] Reliability and validity of a Chinese version of the Diagnostic Interview for Borderlines-Revised
    Wang, Lanlan
    Yuan, Chenmei
    Qiu, Jianying
    Gunderson, John
    Zhang, Min
    Jiang, Kaida
    Leung, Freedom
    Zhong, Jie
    Xiao, Zeping
    ASIA-PACIFIC PSYCHIATRY, 2014, 6 (03) : 326 - 333
  • [8] Concordance of the composite international diagnostic interview version 3.0 (CIDI 3.0) with standardized clinical assessments in the WHO World Mental Health Surveys
    Haro, Josep Maria
    Arbabzadeh-Bouchez, Saena
    Brugha, Traolach S.
    De Girolamo, Giovanni
    Guyer, Margaret E.
    Jin, Robert
    Lepine, Jean Pierre
    Mazzi, Fausto
    Reneses, Blanca
    Vilagut, Gemma
    Sampson, Nancy A.
    Kessler, Ronald C.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF METHODS IN PSYCHIATRIC RESEARCH, 2006, 15 (04) : 167 - 180
  • [9] THE DISCRIMINATE VALIDITY OF THE PSYCHIATRIC DIAGNOSTIC INTERVIEW
    POWELL, BJ
    PENICK, EC
    OTHMER, E
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHIATRY, 1985, 46 (08) : 320 - 322
  • [10] The reliability of the Brazilian version of the Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI 2.1)
    Quintana, MI
    Andreoli, SB
    Jorge, MR
    Gastal, FL
    Miranda, CT
    BRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL AND BIOLOGICAL RESEARCH, 2004, 37 (11) : 1739 - 1745