ICU经鼻高流量氧疗患者机械通气风险预测模型的建立

被引:3
|
作者
种萌
牛亚芳
马鑫
马莉
机构
[1] 兰州大学第二医院重症医学三科(急诊ICU),兰州
关键词
高流量氧疗; 机械通气; 列线图; 预测模型; 预后;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R459.7 [急症、急救处理];
学科分类号
100218 ;
摘要
目的建立重症监护室经鼻高流量氧疗患者最终行机械通气风险的预测模型, 为临床提供便捷有效的预测方法及准确的治疗时机, 提高ICU患者的预后。方法回顾性收集2019年1月至2021年12月本院重症监护室收治的经鼻高流量氧疗患者为研究对象。收集患者的一般临床资料, 包括入院24 h内生命体征、血气生化指标、炎症指标、急性合并症、APACHE Ⅱ评分、ICU住院时长及总住院时长等, 对上述指标进行统计学分析并构建列线图。结果本研究最终纳入362例患者, 根据最终是否行机械通气分为经鼻高流量氧疗组(HFNC组)及氧疗失败行无创正压机械通气组(noninvasive positive pressure ventilation, NIPPV组)。将两组患者基线资料进行单因素及二元Logistic多因素回归分析后, 结果表明APACHEⅡ评分(OR=1.323,95%CI:1.818~1.483)、ROX指数(OR=0.371,95%CI: 0.226~0.609)、总住院时长(OR=1.097,95%CI:1.003~1.200)及合并急性呼吸衰竭(OR=2.456,95%CI: 1.368~4.506)是决定患者是否行机械通气的独立影响因素。基于上述独立影响因素构建列线图, 通过评估及验证模型显示, 该模型的拟合优度R2为0.892, C-index为0.985;模型的校准曲线与理想曲线拟合较好, 列线图与各独立影响因素的ROC曲线下面积分别为0.985、0.959、0.899、0.656和0.576, 表明该模型比单独指标预测风险效能更高;决策曲线分析也显示出该列线图具有极高的临床获益性。结论影响经鼻高流量氧疗患者是否行机械通相关因素较多, 本文通过单因素及多因素分析后将最具有价值的指标联合, 建立了预测性能较好的评估患者风险的列线图, 可进一步为临床医生提供简单有效的预测方法, 提高患者的预后。
引用
收藏
页码:1042 / 1048
页数:7
相关论文
共 21 条
  • [1] An Integrated Model including the ROX Index to Predict the Success of High-Flow Nasal Cannula Use after Planned Extubation: A Retrospective Observational Cohort Study
    Lee, Young Seok
    Chang, Sung Won
    Sim, Jae Kyeom
    Kim, Sua
    Kim, Je Hyeong
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2021, 10 (16)
  • [2] Nosocomial Infection
    Kollef, Marin H.
    Torres, Antoni
    Shorr, Andrew F.
    Martin-Loeches, Ignacio
    Micek, Scott T.
    [J]. CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2021, 49 (02) : 169 - 187
  • [3] Comparison of outcomes of high-flow nasal cannula and noninvasive positive-pressure ventilation in patients with hypoxemia and various APACHE II scores after extubation
    Shang, Xiaoke
    Wang, Yanggan
    [J]. THERAPEUTIC ADVANCES IN RESPIRATORY DISEASE, 2021, 15
  • [4] Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: Diagnosis and Management[J] . Saguil Aaron,Fargo Matthew V.American family physician . 2020 (12)
  • [5] Increasing support by nasal high flow acutely modifies the ROX index in hypoxemic patients: A physiologic study[J] . Tommaso Mauri,Eleonora Carlesso,Elena Spinelli,Cecilia Turrini,Francesca Dalla Corte,Riccarda Russo,Jean-Damien Ricard,Antonio Pesenti,Oriol Roca,Giacomo Grasselli.Journal of Critical Care . 2019
  • [6] High flow nasal cannula compared with conventional oxygen therapy for acute hypoxemic respiratory failure
    Luo, Meng-Si
    Huang, Guan-Jiang
    Wu, Lun
    [J]. INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 2019, 45 (08) : 1167 - 1168
  • [7] Invasive Mechanical Ventilation
    Walter, James M.
    Corbridge, Thomas C.
    Singer, Benjamin D.
    [J]. SOUTHERN MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2018, 111 (12) : 746 - 753
  • [8] High-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy is superior to conventional oxygen therapy but not to noninvasive mechanical ventilation on intubation rate: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J] . Zhao Huiying,Wang Huixia,Sun Feng,Lyu Shan,An Youzhong.Critical care (London, England) . 2017 (1)
  • [9] Assessing the Clinical Impact of Risk Prediction Models With Decision Curves: Guidance for Correct Interpretation and Appropriate Use[J] . Kerr Kathleen F,Brown Marshall D,Zhu Kehao,Janes Holly.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology . 2016 (21)
  • [10] Ventilator-associated pneumonia in ARDS patients: the impact of prone positioning. A secondary analysis of the PROSEVA trial
    Ayzac, L.
    Girard, R.
    Baboi, L.
    Beuret, P.
    Rabilloud, M.
    Richard, J. C.
    Guerin, C.
    [J]. INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 2016, 42 (05) : 871 - 878