台风作用下核电站海岸防护标准的概率分析

被引：5
|
作者：
刘德辅
韩凤亭
庞亮
王风清
机构：
[1] 中国海洋大学工程学院
来源：
中国海洋大学学报(自然科学版) | 2010年 / 40卷 / 06期
关键词：
台风; 核电站; 海岸工程; 规范修正; 双层嵌套多目标概率模式;
D O I：
10.16441/j.cnki.hdxb.2010.06.023
中图分类号：
TM623.8 [环境与安全]; P444 [热带气象];
学科分类号：
摘要：
随着全球气候变暖和海平面上升,台风发生的频次和强度呈逐年增大的趋势。由台风引发的灾害及带来的后果促使人们必须重新评估核电站的海岸防护标准。文中对核电安全规定中的"可能最大台风"(Probable Maximum Typhoon)、"可能最大暴潮"(Probable Maximum Storm Surge)、"设计基准洪水"(Design Basic Flood)进行了概率分析,并用"双层嵌套多目标概率模式"(DLNMPM)对设计规范计算结果进行了修正。
引用
收藏
页码：140 / 146
页数：7
相关论文
共 8 条
  • [1] Theory of multivariate compound extreme value distribution and its application to extreme sea state prediction[J]. LIU Defu1, WANG Liping2 & PANG Liang3 1. Disaster Prevention Research Institute, Ocean University of China, Qingdao 266003, China;2. Department of Mathematics, Ocean University of China, Qingdao 266071, China;3. College of Engineering, Ocean University of China, Qingdao 266071, China.Chinese Science Bulletin. 2006(23)
  • [2] Disaster prevention design criteria for the estuarine cities: New Orleans and Shanghai
    LIU Defu 1*
    [J]. ActaOceanologicaSinica, 2006, (04) : 131 - 142
  • [3] 核电厂海域工程的设计标准问题
    谢世楞
    [J]. 中国港湾建设, 2000, (01) : 6 - 9
  • [4] 滨海核电站可能最大风暴潮(PMSS)研究
    王乐铭
    刘建良
    [J]. 电力勘测, 1999, (02) : 50 - 54
  • [5] Typhoon disaster in China: prediction, prevention, and mitigation[J] . Defu Liu,Liang Pang,Botao Xie.Natural Hazards . 2009 (3)
  • [6] Typhoon disaster zoning and prevention criteria—A double layer nested multi-objective probability model and its application[J] . DeFu Liu,Liang Pang,BoTao Xie,YuanKang Wu.Science in China Series E: Technological Sciences . 2008 (7)
  • [7] Estimating uncertainty in the extreme value analysis of data generated by a hurricane simulation model
    Coles, S
    Simiu, E
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING MECHANICS-ASCE, 2003, 129 (11): : 1288 - 1294
  • [8] Can global sensitivity analysis steer the implementation of models for environmental assessments and decision-making?
    Tarantola, S
    Giglioli, N
    Jesinghaus, J
    Saltelli, A
    [J]. STOCHASTIC ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND RISK ASSESSMENT, 2002, 16 (01) : 63 - 76
1