Optimization and Allocation of Spinning Reserves in a Low-Carbon Framework

被引:35
作者
Bruninx K. [1 ]
Van Den Bergh K. [1 ]
Delarue E. [1 ]
D'Haeseleer W. [1 ]
机构
[1] University of Leuven, KU Leuven, Energy Institute, TME Branch (Energy Conversion), Leuven
关键词
Probabilistic reserves; stochastic unit commitment; wind power;
D O I
10.1109/TPWRS.2015.2430282
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Low-carbon electric power systems are often characterized by high shares of renewables, such as wind power. The variable nature and limited predictability of some renewables will require novel system operation methods to properly size and cost-efficiently allocate the required reserves. The current state-of-the-art stochastic unit commitment models internalize this sizing and allocation process by considering a set of scenarios representing the stochastic input during the unit commitment optimization. This results in a cost-efficient scheduling of reserves, while maintaining the reliability of the system. However, calculation times are typically high. Therefore, in this paper, we merge a state-of-the-art probabilistic reserve sizing technique and stochastic unit commitment model with a limited number of scenarios in order to reduce the computational cost. Results obtained for a power system with a 30% wind energy penetration show that this hybrid approach allows to approximate the expected operational costs and reliability of the resulting unit commitment of the stochastic model at roughly one thirtieth of the computational cost. The presented hybrid unit commitment model can be used by researchers to assess the impact of uncertainty on power systems or by independent system operators to optimize their unit commitment decisions taking into account the uncertainty in their system. © 1969-2012 IEEE.
引用
收藏
页码:872 / 882
页数:10
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]  
Ruiz P.A., Philbrick C.R., Sauer P.W., Wind power day-ahead uncertainty management through stochastic unit commitment policies, Proc. 2009 IEEE/PES Power Systems Conf. Expo, pp. 1-9, (2009)
[2]  
Tuohy A., Meibom P., Denny E., O'Malley M., Unit commitment for systems with significant wind penetration, IEEE Trans. Power Syst., 24, 2, pp. 592-601, (2009)
[3]  
Botterud A., Zhou Z., Unit commitment and operating reserves with probabilistic wind power forecasts, Proc. IEEE PowerTech, 2011, pp. 1-7, (2011)
[4]  
Papavasiliou A., Reserve requirements for wind power integration: A scenario-based stochastic programming framework, IEEE Trans. Power Syst., 26, 4, pp. 2197-2206, (2011)
[5]  
Bruninx K., Delarue E., D'Haeseleer W., A Modelling framework for the integration of intermittent renewables: The added value of stochastic unit commitment, KU Leuven Energy Institute Working Papers, (2014)
[6]  
Kaut M., Wallace S.W., Evaluation of scenario-generation methods for stochastic programming, Pacific J. Optimiz, 3, 2, pp. 257-271, (2007)
[7]  
Kundur P., Balu N.J., Lauby M.G., Power System Stability and Control, 7, (1994)
[8]  
Wang J., Botterud A., Bessa R., Keko H., Carvalho L., Issicaba D., Sumaili J., Miranda V., Wind power forecasting uncertainty and unit commitment, Appl. Energy, 88, 11, pp. 4014-4023, (2011)
[9]  
Bruninx K., Delarue E., A statistical description of the error on wind power forecasts for probabilistic reserve sizing, IEEE Trans. Sustain. Energy, 5, 3, pp. 995-1002, (2014)
[10]  
Cerisola S., Baillo A., Fernandez-Lopez J.M., Ramos A., Gollmer R., Stochastic power generation unit commitment in electricity markets: A novel formulation and a comparison of solution methods, Oper. Res., 57, 1, pp. 32-46, (2009)