Comparison of local minocycline hydrochloride delivery and antimicrobial photodynamic therapy as adjuncts to mechanical debridement for the treatment of peri-implant mucositis: A randomized controlled trial

被引:0
|
作者
Almubarak, Abdulrahman M. [1 ]
机构
[1] King Saud Univ, Coll Dent, Dept Periodont & Community Dent, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
关键词
Antimicrobial photodynamic therapy; Mechanical debridement; Minocycline hydrochloride; Peri-implant mucositis; Probing depth; CLINICAL-EFFICACY;
D O I
10.1016/j.pdpdt.2024.104461
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objective: The aim was to compare the efficacy of local minocycline hydrochloride delivery (LMHD) and antimicrobial photodynamic therapy (aPDT) as adjuncts to mechanical debridement (MD) for the treatment of peri-implant mucositis (PM). Methods: Patients with PM were included. The following information was retrieved from patients' digital dental records: (a) age, (b) gender, (c) duration of implants in function, (d) number of implants, (e) depth of implant placement, and (f) mode of prosthesis retention. Information related to daily toothbrushing and flossing of interproximal spaces and the most recent visit to an oral healthcare provider was also recorded. Participants were randomly divided into three groups as follows: (a) MD + LMHD; (b) MD + aPDT, and (c) MD alone. Peri-implant modified plaque index (mPI), modified gingival index (mGI) and probing depth (PD) were measured at baseline and at 45 days follow-up. Peri-implant crestal bone levels were measured at baseline. Group comparisons were done using One-way analysis of variance and Bonferroni post-hoc adjustment tests. The correlation between peri-implant clinical parameters and age, gender, and duration of implants in function was assessed using linear regression analysis. Level of significance was set at P < 0.05. Results: Twenty-two and 22 patients underwent MD with adjunct LMDH and aPDT, respectively. Twenty-two participants underwent MD alone. There was no difference in the mean ages of all individuals. At baseline, there was no difference in mPI, mGI and PD in all groups. At follow-up, mPI (P < 0.05), mGI (P < 0.05) and PD (P <0.05) were higher among patients who underwent MD alone than individuals who received LMHD or aPDT as adjuncts to MD. There was no difference in mPI, mGI, and PD among individuals who underwent LMHD and aPDT as adjuvants to MD. Conclusion: In the short term, MD with adjunct LMHD or aPDT is effective for managing PM.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Efficacy of Antimicrobial Photodynamic Therapy as an Adjunctive to Mechanical Debridement in the Treatment of Peri-implant Diseases: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
    Karimi, Mohammad Reza
    Hasani, Ali
    Khosroshahian, Salva
    JOURNAL OF LASERS IN MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2016, 7 (03) : 139 - 145
  • [2] Probiotic supplements and debridement of peri-implant mucositis: A randomized controlled trial
    Hallstrom, Hadar
    Lindgren, Susann
    Widen, Cecilia
    Renvert, Stefan
    Twetman, Svante
    ACTA ODONTOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2016, 74 (01) : 60 - 66
  • [3] Efficacy of Antibiotic Versus Probiotics as Adjuncts to Mechanical Debridement for the Treatment of Peri-Implant Mucositis
    Kumararama, Sindhu Sudhakar
    Patil, Manali
    Kukreja, Bhavna Jha
    Salkar, Manjiri
    Verma, Shikha
    Pattnaik, Naina
    Patil, Lalit
    JOURNAL OF PHARMACY AND BIOALLIED SCIENCES, 2024, 16 (SUPPL 4) : S3389 - S3391
  • [4] Efficacy of adjunctive photodynamic therapy to conventional mechanical debridement for peri-implant mucositis
    Guo, Jincai
    Chen, Xueru
    Xie, Hui
    Li, Tongjun
    BMC ORAL HEALTH, 2024, 24 (01)
  • [5] Efficacy of Antibiotic Versus Probiotics As Adjuncts to Mechanical Debridement for the Treatment of Peri-Implant Mucositis
    Alqahtani, Fawaz
    Alshaikh, Maha
    Mehmood, Abid
    Alqhtani, Nasser
    Alkhtani, Fahad
    Alenazi, Adel
    JOURNAL OF ORAL IMPLANTOLOGY, 2022, 48 (02) : 99 - 104
  • [6] Role of mechanical curettage with and without adjunct antimicrobial photodynamic therapy in the treatment of peri-implant mucositis in cigarette smokers: A randomized controlled clinical trial
    Javed, Fawad
    BinShabaib, Munerah Saleh
    Alharthi, Shatha Subhi
    Qadri, Talat
    PHOTODIAGNOSIS AND PHOTODYNAMIC THERAPY, 2017, 18 : 331 - 334
  • [7] Adjunctive effect of mouthrinse on treatment of peri-implant mucositis using mechanical debridement: A randomized clinical trial
    Philip, Juliana
    Laine, Marja L.
    Wismeijer, Daniel
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY, 2020, 47 (07) : 883 - 891
  • [8] Efficacy of Adjunctive Antimicrobial Photodynamic Therapy to Mechanical Debridement in the Treatment of Peri-implantitis or Peri-implant Mucositis in Smokers: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Shahmohammadi, Rojin
    Younespour, Shima
    Paknejad, Mojgan
    Chiniforush, Nasim
    Heidari, Mohadeseh
    PHOTOCHEMISTRY AND PHOTOBIOLOGY, 2022, 98 (01) : 232 - 241
  • [9] Comparison of an Herbal- and a 0.12% Chlorhexidine-based Oral Rinse as Adjuncts to Nonsurgical Mechanical Debridement in the Management of Peri-implant Mucositis: A Randomised Controlled Trial
    Alzoman, Hamad
    Alojaym, Tariq Ghazi
    Chalikkandy, Sandeepa Nuchilakath
    Mehmood, Abid
    Rashed, Fayza
    Divakar, Darshan Devang
    ORAL HEALTH & PREVENTIVE DENTISTRY, 2020, 18 (04) : 645 - 651
  • [10] Comparison of photobiomodulation and photodynamic therapy as adjuncts to mechanical debridement for the treatment of peri-implantitis
    Al-Askar, Mansour H.
    Abdullatif, Fahad A.
    Alshihri, Abdulmonem A.
    Ahmed, Asma
    Divakar, Darshan Devang
    Almoharib, Hani
    Alzoman, Hamad
    TECHNOLOGY AND HEALTH CARE, 2022, 30 (02) : 389 - 398