Nurses' Perceptions of Organisational Attractiveness and Related Factors in Health Care: A Mixed Methods Systematic Review

被引:0
|
作者
Karjalainen, Kirsi [1 ]
Makkonen, Marjo [1 ]
Kuha, Suvi [1 ,2 ]
Kanste, Outi [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oulu, Fac Med, Res Unit Hlth Sci & Technol, Oulu, Finland
[2] Joanna Briggs Inst Ctr Excellence, Finnish Ctr Evidence Based Hlth Care, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[3] Univ Oulu, Oulu Univ Hosp, Med Res Ctr Oulu, Oulu, Finland
关键词
health care; nurses; organisational attractiveness; systematic review; MEDIA;
D O I
10.1111/jan.16634
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
AimTo identify and integrate the best evidence on nurses' perceptions of organisational attractiveness and related factors in health care.DesignA mixed methods systematic review.MethodsThe review followed the Joanna Briggs Institute Mixed Methods Systematic Review methodology and a convergent segregated approach which involved separate qualitative and quantitative syntheses followed by integration in a narrative form.Data SourcesA systematic search was conducted in August 2023 with no time or geographical limits in CINAHL, PubMed, Finnish database Medic, Scopus, ProQuest, Web of Science, MedNar and EBSCO databases. Studies published in English, Finnish and Swedish were included.ResultsEleven studies (three qualitative, eight quantitative) were identified and studied further. The results indicated that key themes of organisational attractiveness in health care were the dimensions of patient and professional work well-being, opportunities for professional growth and the responsibilities of the organisation.ConclusionsPatient and work well-being for nurses have a considerable effect on organisational attractiveness. Organisations play a notable role in enabling nurses' professional growth. Responsibilities of the organisation extend to higher political decision-making as well as to managers of the healthcare organisations. Organisational attractiveness covers the entire organisation, its patients, professionals and managers. Enhancing multi-professional cooperation, implementing effective management practices and branding of the organisation can contribute to increased organisational attractiveness.Implications for Practice and ResearchOrganisations should consider nurses' wishes, develop strategies to improve competencies, leverage social media to develop their brand, extend the orientation to all levels of the organisation and increase interdepartmental and external collaboration. Future research on organisational attractiveness is necessary in health care and the views of healthcare professionals on a wider scale.Reporting MethodThe Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines were used when reporting the results.Patient or Public ContributionThere was no patient or public contribution.Trial and Protocol RegistrationThe protocol was registered in the PROSPERO database of the National Institute of Health Research (CRD42023451680).
引用
收藏
页码:1734 / 1754
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A systematic review of mixed methods research on human factors and ergonomics in health care
    Carayon, Pascale
    Kianfar, Sarah
    Li, Yaqiong
    Xie, Anping
    Alyousef, Bashar
    Wooldridge, Abigail
    APPLIED ERGONOMICS, 2015, 51 : 291 - 321
  • [2] Nurses' perceptions and experiences of work role transitions: a mixed methods systematic review of the literature
    Arrowsmith, Victoria
    Lau-Walker, Margaret
    Norman, Ian
    Maben, Jill
    JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 2016, 72 (08) : 1735 - 1750
  • [3] Nurses' perceptions and beliefs related to the care of adults living with multimorbidity: A systematic qualitative review
    Whitehead, Lisa
    Palamara, Peter
    Allen, Jacqueline
    Boak, Jennifer
    Quinn, Robyn
    George, Cobie
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NURSING, 2022, 31 (19-20) : 2716 - 2736
  • [4] Health-care leaders' and professionals' experiences and perceptions of compassionate leadership: A mixed-methods systematic review
    Ostergard, Kevin
    Kuha, Suvi
    Kanste, Outi
    LEADERSHIP IN HEALTH SERVICES, 2023, 37 (05) : 49 - 65
  • [5] Nurses' perceptions of using volunteer support in health care settings: A systematic scoping review
    Crookes, Kate
    Saunders, Rosemary
    Kemp, Vivien
    Gallagher, Olivia
    Ghosh, Manonita
    Bulsara, Caroline
    Gullick, Karen
    O'Connell, Bev
    INTERNATIONAL NURSING REVIEW, 2023, 70 (03) : 405 - 414
  • [6] Nurses' Attitudes and Perceptions Towards Heart Failure Palliative Care: A Mixed Method Systematic Review
    Caleffi, Dalia
    Alberti, Sara
    Rovesti, Sergio
    Bassi, Maria Chiara
    Hassen, Hajer
    Saguatti, Ilaria
    Cannizzaro, Domenico
    Ferri, Paola
    HEALTHCARE, 2025, 13 (06)
  • [7] Comparing nurses' and patients' research priorities in cancer care: A mixed methods systematic review
    Cadorin, L.
    Truccolo, I.
    Bressan, V.
    Suter, N.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2018, 29
  • [8] The Role of Nurses and the Facilitators and Barriers in Diabetes Care: A Mixed Methods Systematic Literature Review
    Nikitara, Monica
    Constantinou, Costas S.
    Andreou, Eleni
    Diomidous, Marianna
    BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES, 2019, 9 (06)
  • [9] Social Health and Related Factors in Nurses: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Sharifi, Khadijeh
    Sooki, Zahra
    Tagharrobi, Zahra
    Ghanbari-Afra, Leila
    IRANIAN JOURNAL OF NURSING AND MIDWIFERY RESEARCH, 2024, 29 (02) : 166 - 179
  • [10] Factors influencing the uptake of antenatal care in Uganda: a mixed methods systematic review
    Bhutada, Kiran
    Venkateswaran, Mahima
    Atim, Maureen
    Munabi-Babigumira, Susan
    Nankabirwa, Victoria
    Namagembe, Flavia
    Froen, J. Frederik
    Papadopoulou, Eleni
    BMC PREGNANCY AND CHILDBIRTH, 2024, 24 (01)