African American Language in science education: A translanguaging perspective

Ideologies of language and race are deeply connected in the United States. Language practices associated with racially marginalized communities, such as African American Language (AAL) or Spanglish, are often heavily stigmatized. Such stigma is not grounded in empirical research on language, but rather in "raciolinguistic ideologies" that reproduce white supremacy and oppression in teacher education and in US classrooms-including science classrooms. Science education need not be this way, however. Translanguaging pedagogies can create space for students to use any and all types of languaging practices to engage in scientific sensemaking. Implementing translanguaging pedagogies to support scientific sensemaking will require science teachers to develop inclusive ideologies of language-not only the knowledge that multiple varieties of language are valid tools for sensemaking, but also the inclination and ability to formatively assess student thinking even when that thinking is not couched in canonical "science language." In the present manuscript, we explore the relationships among teachers' language ideologies, their racial ideologies, their knowledge of language as an epistemic tool for teaching science, their self-reported assessment practices, and their actual responses to several different samples of student science writing-including a writing sample that includes an oft-stigmatized feature of African American Language. We show that teachers with more language-inclusive ideologies-that is, those who take a translanguaging stance, and thus value the use of AAL in classrooms-appear to be better at formatively assessing and responding to student science writing compared to teachers with more language-exclusive ideologies. We also show that seemingly race-neutral ideologies of language are in fact strongly associated with oppressive ideologies of race, and that these language ideologies predict teachers' science formative assessment practices independently of existing measures of pedagogical knowledge. We discuss implications for science teaching, teacher education, and science education research.