Simple Summary Pesticides have become essential to control agricultural pests such as weeds, insects, nematodes, bacteria, and fungi, which increases the risk of their transmission to animals through the feed produced from these crops. Among these pesticides, the most widely used is malathion (MOP). It exerts its toxicity through the inhibition of acetylcholinesterase (AChE), an important presynaptic enzyme that terminates nerve impulses by hydrolyzing neurotransmitter acetylcholine. This study highlights the biochemical and histological hazardous reactions of MOP and the detoxifying efficacy of thyme (TEO) and oregano (OEO) essential oils by measuring enzyme-specific activity for Cytochrome P450 1A2 (CYP1A2) in order to reduce environmental hazards. Such knowledge would be the key step toward developing potentially unique treatment options for natural antitoxins. This may allow the livestock sector to increase production and ensure animal welfare and product health and safety.Abstract The widespread use of malathion may offer several hazards to humans and animals; additionally, many medicinal plants provide what is known as a broad antitoxicity treatment. This study was carried out to investigate hazardous biochemical and histological reactions to MOP and evaluate the effectiveness of TEO and OEO essential oils in restoring normal physiological conditions after MOP exposure by measuring enzyme-specific activity for Cytochrome P450 1A2 (CYP1A2). One hundred and twenty rats were divided into six groups of twenty animals each: (i) C - MOP served as the control group, (ii) C + MOP treated with 5 mg/kg/BW of Malathion-D10, (iii) TEO treated with 100 mg/kg/BW of oregano essential oil, (iv) TEO treated with 100 mg/kg/BW of thyme essential oil, (v) MOP + OEO treated with 5 mg/kg/BW of Malathion-D10 and 100 mg/kg/BW of oregano essential oil, and (vi) MOP + TEO treated with 5 mg/kg/BW of Malathion-D10 and 100 mg/kg/BW of thyme essential oil. The results indicated the protective effects of OEO and TEO against MOP-induced weight loss. Additionally, there was a significant improvement in ALT, AST, and ALK-Ph after being treated with OEO and TEO, either alone or after MOP exposure. Also, treatment with OEO and TEO ameliorated these oxidative stress parameters, indicating their antioxidative properties. A histopathological examination of liver tissues showed reduced hepatocellular damage and improved liver architecture in the OEO and TEO, both alone and in combination with MOP, and protective effects were more pronounced in the TEO-treated groups. However, the results indicated that TEO was more effective than OEO in increasing CYP1A2 expression and alleviating MOP-induced toxicity. Specifically, TEO showed higher protein expression and therapeutic action in reducing liver damage. In conclusion, these findings suggest that OEO and TEO may be potent therapeutic agents against MOP toxicity, offering protective effects by enhancing CYP1A2 activity and mitigating organ damage. Such knowledge would be an important step toward developing potentially unique treatment options for natural antitoxins.