Comparative Analysis of Residential Parking Questions in National Travel Surveys: A Cross-Country Study

被引:0
|
作者
Porschen, Marcel [1 ]
Kuhnimhof, Tobias [1 ]
机构
[1] Rhein Westfal TH Aachen, Chair & Inst Urban & Transport Planning, D-52074 Aachen, Germany
关键词
National Travel Survey; residential parking; parking location; household survey; travel survey; survey design; REQUIREMENTS; MINIMUM; INFRASTRUCTURE; CHOICE;
D O I
10.3390/urbansci9010003
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Availability and utilization of residential parking locations remain a crucial yet often overlooked aspect of urban planning and policy making. Thus, this study investigates questions about residential parking within National Travel Surveys (NTS) across 49 OECD-affiliated countries. The study used a layered framework, differentiating parking locations by on/off-street, public/private access, proximity to dwellings, and infrastructure type to analyze questions and response options. A document review revealed significant variability in the inclusion of residential parking questions, with only 24 of 49 evaluated countries conducting NTS and only 15 explicitly addressing residential parking locations, often via one question. While questions are often similar, the response options are often ambiguous, sometimes misleading, and vary significantly. Based on the results, we identified the following recommendations: (1) adopt and rephrase parking-related questions in new and existing NTS, (2) provide guidance to users on how certain response options are defined, (3) for a more comprehensive understanding of residential parking dynamics, include a question on availability and actual usage, (4) add "National Travel Survey" as a keyword in applicable surveys, and (5) provide easy access to documentation to facilitate data retrieval and international comparison.
引用
收藏
页数:23
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] National Innovation Capacity Index: A Cross-Country Comparative Analysis
    Rongping Mu
    Kangwei Chi
    Kaihua Chen
    InnovationandDevelopmentPolicy, 2019, 1 (02) : 132 - 158
  • [2] Stated willingness to participate in travel surveys: a cross-country and cross-methods comparison
    Verzosa, Nina
    Greaves, Stephen
    Ho, Chinh
    Davis, Mark
    TRANSPORTATION, 2021, 48 (03) : 1311 - 1327
  • [3] Stated willingness to participate in travel surveys: a cross-country and cross-methods comparison
    Nina Verzosa
    Stephen Greaves
    Chinh Ho
    Mark Davis
    Transportation, 2021, 48 : 1311 - 1327
  • [4] SENSITIVE QUESTIONS IN CROSS-NATIONAL COMPARATIVE SURVEYS
    Andreenkova, A., V
    SOTSIOLOGICHESKIE ISSLEDOVANIYA, 2017, (12): : 55 - 64
  • [5] Using the Case Study Method in Studying the National Innovation System: Cross-Country Comparative Analysis
    Zhuparova, Aziza
    Sagiyeva, Rimma
    Zhaisanova, Dinara
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 13TH EUROPEAN CONFERENCE ON INNOVATION AND ENTREPRENEURSHIP (ECIE 2018), 2018, : 883 - 892
  • [6] Comparative Analysis of Entrepreneurial Intention Among Students: A Cross-Country Study
    Bordean, Ovidiu Niculae
    Pop, Zenovia Cristiana
    Rizun, Nina
    Bopp, Reinhold
    Estad, Tom
    SAGE OPEN, 2025, 15 (01):
  • [8] Comparative dynamics of housing finance: A cross-country analysis
    Rim, Jongseok
    JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL MARKETS INSTITUTIONS & MONEY, 2024, 94
  • [10] Board composition in national sport federations: a cross-country comparative analysis of diversity and board size
    McLeod, Joshua
    Star, Shaun
    Shilbury, David
    MANAGING SPORT AND LEISURE, 2023, 28 (06) : 714 - 731