Co-creation for public innovation: The role of living labs and user-engagement methodologies

被引:1
|
作者
Gago, David [1 ]
Rubalcaba, Luis [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nacl Educ Distancia, Fac Econ & Business, Dept Econ Anal, Madrid, Spain
[2] Univ Alcala, Fac Econ Business and Tourism, Dept Econ & Business Adm, Madrid, Spain
关键词
Co-creation; living labs (LLs); public innovation; public innovation outcomes; public value; surveys; user-engagement methodologies; users; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1080/09540962.2024.2425423
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
Drawing on a survey of six European countries, this article examines how living labs (LLs) and user engagement methods influence public innovation outcomes. Based on econometric empirical evidence, the authors provide key insights for public sector managers at all levels (national, regional, local), emphasizing that active user involvement leads to better innovation outcomes, particularly those that go beyond the innovation process and influence how users perceive or benefit from public services (for example, by increasing user service quality). The authors recommend prioritizing value-creation functions that enable the most active user involvement methods based on co-creation over internal-focused processes. Additionally, they highlight the importance of supporting LLs as methodologically robust, sustainable, long-term innovation infrastructures, rather than tying them to short-term and limited resourcing projects. These conclusions are valid across different countries, varying sizes of public units, and levels of government (municipal or national). Public living labs (LLs) promote collaboration to tackle societal challenges. However, their success cannot be taken for granted, as user engagement methodologies matter. Drawing on data from a survey of six European countries, the article explores how LLs and user engagement methods are connected with public innovation outcomes. The authors conclude that methods with higher user involvement based on co-creation tend to produce better innovation outcomes, and the most relevant are those directly related to user experience versus cost or other internal-oriented outcomes. The conclusions hold across different countries, varying sizes of public units, and levels of government (municipal or national). The article also provides both policy implications when designing and implementing LLs in public sector, and managerial implications to promote effective public value creation in collaboration with users, citizens, or organizations.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Insights on Value Co-Creation, Living Labs and Innovation in the Public Sector
    Rubalcaba, Luis
    Strokosch, Kirsty
    Hansen, Anne Vorre
    Rohnebaek, Maria
    Liefooghe, Christine
    ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCES, 2022, 12 (01)
  • [2] Urban Living Labs and the Role of Users in Co-Creation
    Menny, Mascha
    Palgan, Yuliya Voytenko
    McCormick, Kes
    GAIA-ECOLOGICAL PERSPECTIVES FOR SCIENCE AND SOCIETY, 2018, 27 : 68 - 77
  • [3] Living Labs and user engagement for innovation and sustainability
    Compagnucci, Lorenzo
    Spigarelli, Francesca
    Coelho, Jose
    Duarte, Carlos
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2021, 289
  • [4] Co-Creation Dynamics in Urban Living Labs
    Puerari, Emma
    de Koning, Jotte I. J. C.
    von Wirth, Timo
    Karre, Philip M.
    Mulder, Ingrid J.
    Loorbach, Derk A.
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2018, 10 (06)
  • [5] Value co-creation in tourism living labs
    Dickinger, Astrid
    Kolomoyets, Yuliya
    JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2024, 183
  • [6] Knowledge exchange and innovation co-creation in living labs projects in South Africa
    Habiyaremye, Alexis
    INNOVATION AND DEVELOPMENT, 2020, 10 (02) : 207 - 222
  • [7] Co-creation and innovation in public services
    Alves, Helena
    SERVICE INDUSTRIES JOURNAL, 2013, 33 (7-8): : 671 - 682
  • [8] Public Value Co-Creation in Living Labs-Results from Three Case Studies
    Haug, Nathalie
    Mergel, Ines
    ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCES, 2021, 11 (03)
  • [9] Open Innovation and Co-creation in the Public Sector: Understanding the Role of Intermediaries
    Gasco-Hernandez, Mila
    Sandoval-Almazan, Rodrigo
    Gil-Garcia, J. Ramon
    ELECTRONIC PARTICIPATION (EPART 2017), 2017, 10429 : 140 - 148
  • [10] Public innovation laboratory a space for co-creation
    Salvador Hernandez, Yudith
    Llanes Font, Mariluz
    AVANCES, 2021, 23 (02): : 139 - 151