Patient preferences for drug therapy in inflammatory arthritis: protocol for a living systematic review and evidence map to inform clinical practice guidelines

被引:0
|
作者
Saadat, Pakeezah [1 ]
Bansback, Nick [2 ,3 ]
Falahee, Marie [4 ,5 ]
Hiligsmann, Mickael [6 ]
Tugwell, Peter [7 ,8 ]
Buchbinder, Rachelle [9 ]
Whittle, Samuel [10 ,11 ]
Richards, Dawn P. [12 ]
Proulx, Laurie [12 ]
Schunemann, Holger [13 ,14 ,15 ]
Alonso-Coello, Pablo [16 ]
Nieuwlaat, Robby [14 ,17 ,18 ]
Wiercioch, Wojtek [14 ,17 ,18 ]
Kuper, Simon [19 ]
Pardo Pardo, Jordi [20 ]
Hazlewood, Glen [3 ,21 ,22 ,23 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Inst Hlth Policy Management & Evaluat, Toronto, ON, Canada
[2] Univ British Columbia, Sch Populat & Publ Hlth, Vancouver, BC, Canada
[3] Arthrit Res Canada, Richmond, BC, Canada
[4] Univ Birmingham, Inst Inflammat & Ageing, Coll Med & Dent Sci, Rheumatol Res Grp, Birmingham, England
[5] Univ Hosp Birmingham NHS Fdn Trust, NIHR Birmingham Biomed Res Ctr, Birmingham, England
[6] Maastricht Univ, CAPHRI Care & Publ Hlth Res Inst, Dept Hlth Serv Res, Maastricht, Netherlands
[7] Univ Ottawa, Fac Med, Dept Med, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[8] Ottawa Hosp Res Inst, Clin Epidemiol Program, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[9] Monash Univ, Sch Publ Hlth & Prevent Med, Musculoskeletal Hlth & Wiser Hlth Care Units, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[10] Monash Univ, Sch Publ Hlth & Prevent Med, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[11] Queen Elizabeth Hosp, Rheumatol Unit, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[12] Canadian Arthrit Patient Alliance, Toronto, ON, Canada
[13] McMaster Univ, Dept Hlth Res Methods Evidence & Impact, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[14] McMaster Univ, Dept Med, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[15] Humanitas Univ, Dept Biomed Sci, Milan, Italy
[16] Ctr GRADE Barcelona, Inst Invest Biomed, Barcelona, Spain
[17] McMaster Univ, Michael G DeGroote Cochrane Canada & GRADE Ctr, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[18] McMaster Univ, WHO, GRADE Ctr, Collaborating Ctr Infect Dis Res Methods & Recomme, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[19] Maastricht Univ, Fac Hlth Med & Life Sci, Maastricht, Limburg, Netherlands
[20] Univ Ottawa, Fac Med, Cochrane Musculoskeletal, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[21] Univ Calgary, Dept Med, Cumming Sch Med, Calgary, AB, Canada
[22] Univ Calgary, Dept Community Hlth Sci, Cumming Sch Med, Calgary, AB, Canada
[23] Univ Calgary, Cumming Sch Med, McCaig Inst Bone & Joint Hlth, Calgary, AB, Canada
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2025年 / 15卷 / 01期
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
Patients; RHEUMATOLOGY; Systematic Review;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2024-088267
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction The pharmacological management of inflammatory arthritis often requires choices that involve trade-offs between benefits, risks and other attributes such as administration route, frequency and cost. This living systematic review aims to inform international clinical guidelines on inflammatory arthritis by creating an evidence map of patient preference studies concerning the trade-offs in pharmacological management of inflammatory arthritis.Methods and analysis We will include published and peer-reviewed full-text studies in any language that quantitatively assess preferences of patients for the pharmacological management of inflammatory arthritis (rheumatoid arthritis, spondyloarthritis and juvenile idiopathic arthritis). Studies must use either stated or revealed preference methods to assess preferences and provide a quantitative assessment of relevant characteristics, such as benefits, risks, costs and process attributes. Articles will identified through Medline and EMBASE database searches from inception using search terms that combine keywords and subject headings for inflammatory arthritis and preference-based methods, and a search in the Health Preference Study and Technology Registry using keywords for the populations of interest. Two independent reviewers will perform abstract and full-text screening. Risk of bias will be assessed using the GRADE risk of bias tool. An evidence map will be generated to summarise included studies and their assessments of each trade-off. The search will be conducted every 6 months with new studies added to the inventory.Ethics and dissemination Ethics approval is not required. Results from the base review will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and findings will be presented at conferences. In the living model, we will publish updates and datasets on an Open Science Framework page, with periodic updates in peer-reviewed journals.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A systematic review of questionnaires about patient's values and preferences in clinical practice guidelines
    Bai, Fei
    Ling, Juan
    Esoimeme, Gloria
    Yao, Liang
    Wang, Mingxia
    Huang, Jiajun
    Shi, Anchen
    Cao, Zehui
    Chen, Yaolong
    Tian, Jinhui
    Wang, Xiaoqin
    Yang, Kehu
    PATIENT PREFERENCE AND ADHERENCE, 2018, 12 : 2309 - 2323
  • [2] Do clinical practice guidelines incorporate evidence on patient preferences?
    Chong, C. A.
    Chen, I.
    Naglie, G.
    Krahn, M.
    JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2007, 22 : 38 - 38
  • [3] Evidence map of liver surgery: study protocol of a living systematic review
    Heersche, Sidney
    Giron, Heloise
    Uldry, Emilie
    Joliat, Gaetan-Romain
    Huettner, Felix
    Probst, Pascal
    Melloul, Emmanuel
    Labgaa, Ismail
    BMJ OPEN, 2025, 15 (02):
  • [4] Drug-induced depression: A systematic review to inform clinical practice
    Patten, SB
    Barbui, C
    PSYCHOTHERAPY AND PSYCHOSOMATICS, 2004, 73 (04) : 207 - 215
  • [5] An updated systematic review of stroke clinical practice guidelines to inform aphasia management
    Burton, Bridget
    Isaacs, Megan
    Brogan, Emily
    Shrubsole, Kirstine
    Kilkenny, Monique F.
    Power, Emma
    Godecke, Erin
    Cadilhac, Dominique A.
    Copland, David
    Wallace, Sarah J.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF STROKE, 2023, 18 (09) : 1029 - 1039
  • [6] Evidence of patient beliefs, values, and preferences is not provided in osteoporosis clinical practice guidelines
    Sale, J. E. M.
    Marwah, A.
    Naeem, F.
    Yu, W.
    Meadows, L.
    OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 2019, 30 (07) : 1325 - 1337
  • [7] Evidence of patient beliefs, values, and preferences is not provided in osteoporosis clinical practice guidelines
    J.E.M. Sale
    A. Marwah
    F. Naeem
    W. Yu
    L. Meadows
    Osteoporosis International, 2019, 30 : 1325 - 1337
  • [8] How to integrate individual patient values and preferences in clinical practice guidelines? A research protocol
    van der Weijden, Trudy
    Legare, France
    Boivin, Antoine
    Burgers, Jako S.
    van Veenendaal, Haske
    Stiggelbout, Anne M.
    Faber, Marjan
    Elwyn, Glyn
    IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE, 2010, 5
  • [9] How to integrate individual patient values and preferences in clinical practice guidelines? A research protocol
    Trudy van der Weijden
    France Légaré
    Antoine Boivin
    Jako S Burgers
    Haske van Veenendaal
    Anne M Stiggelbout
    Marjan Faber
    Glyn Elwyn
    Implementation Science, 5
  • [10] Patient values and preferences regarding VTE disease: a systematic review to inform American Society of Hematology guidelines
    Etxeandia-Ikobaltzeta, Itziar
    Zhang, Yuan
    Brundisini, Francesca
    Florez, Ivan D.
    Wiercioch, Wojtek
    Nieuwlaat, Robby
    Begum, Housne
    Cuello, Carlos A.
    Roldan, Yetiani
    Chen, Ru
    Ding, Chengyi
    Morgan, Rebecca L.
    Riva, John J.
    Zhang, Yuqing
    Charide, Rana
    Agarwal, Arnav
    Balduzzi, Sara
    Morgano, Gian Paolo
    Jose Yepes-Nunez, Juan
    Rehman, Yasir
    Neumann, Ignacio
    Schwab, Nicole
    Baldeh, Tejan
    Braun, Cody
    Francisca Rodriguez, Maria
    Schunemann, Holger J.
    BLOOD ADVANCES, 2020, 4 (05) : 953 - 968