Superstition, Risk Aversion, and Audit Quality: Evidence from China

被引:2
|
作者
Dou, Huan [1 ]
Khoo, Eunice S. [2 ]
Tan, Weiqiang [3 ]
Zhang, Janus Jian [4 ]
机构
[1] Jinan Univ, Sch Management, Dept Accounting, Guangzhou, Peoples R China
[2] Australian Natl Univ, Coll Business & Econ, Res Sch Accounting, Canberra, Australia
[3] Educ Univ Hong Kong, Fac Liberal Arts & Social Sci, Dept Social Sci & Policy Studies, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[4] Hong Kong Baptist Univ, Sch Business, Dept Accountancy Econ & Finance, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
来源
关键词
individual auditor; traditional culture; zodiac year; superstition; risk aversion; audit quality;
D O I
10.2308/AJPT-2022-140
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
We examine whether signing auditors' perceptions of bad luck related to the Chinese zodiac-year superstition affect audit quality. We argue that these perceptions of bad luck heighten signing auditors' sense of risk and lead them to act more cautiously in their zodiac years, leading to improved audit quality. We find that clients audited by lead engagement auditors in their zodiac years exhibit lower discretionary accruals and lower propensity to restate. The effects of zodiac-year superstition are evident among lead engagement auditors who are older and hold the partner title. The effects are also evident in large audit firms, which face greater reputation risk, and in provinces with a strong influence of traditional culture. In addition, we find some suggestive evidence that lead engagement auditors may increase audit effort during their zodiac years. Overall, our results support the contention that lead engagement auditors' zodiac year beliefs positively affect audit quality.
引用
收藏
页码:51 / 85
页数:35
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Green Finance Policy, Financial Risk, and Audit Quality: Evidence from China
    Tian, Yunlin
    Pan, Xiaofei
    EUROPEAN ACCOUNTING REVIEW, 2024, 33 (02) : 589 - 615
  • [2] Superstition and Risk Taking: Evidence from "Zodiac Year" Beliefs in China
    Fisman, Ray
    Huang, Wei
    Ning, Bo
    Pan, Yue
    Qiu, Jiaping
    Wang, Yongxiang
    MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2023, 69 (09) : 5174 - 5188
  • [3] Audit Market Concentration, Audit Fees, and Audit Quality: Evidence from China
    Huang, Ting-Chiao
    Chang, Hsihui
    Chiou, Jeng-Ren
    AUDITING-A JOURNAL OF PRACTICE & THEORY, 2016, 35 (02): : 121 - 145
  • [4] The Effect of Audit Partner Diversity on Audit Quality: Evidence from China
    Koh, Kevin
    Li, Li
    Liu, Xuejiao
    Wang, Chunfei
    ABACUS-A JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING FINANCE AND BUSINESS STUDIES, 2023, 59 (01): : 340 - 380
  • [5] Audit quality and audit size: Evidence from auditor mergers in China
    Zhan, Jun
    Her, Young-Won
    Chen, Keji
    JOURNAL OF CORPORATE ACCOUNTING AND FINANCE, 2020, 31 (03): : 170 - 184
  • [6] Employee quality and audit fee: evidence from China
    Li, Xing
    Chen, Xia
    Qi, Baolei
    Tian, Gaoliang
    ACCOUNTING AND FINANCE, 2020, 60 (05): : 4533 - 4566
  • [7] Client importance and audit quality: evidence from China
    Chen, Songsheng
    Li, Zheng
    Chi, Wuchun
    ASIA-PACIFIC JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING & ECONOMICS, 2018, 25 (05) : 624 - 638
  • [8] Industry Specialization and Audit Quality: Evidence from Audit Firm Switches in China
    Ding, Fangfei
    Qiao, Ziwei
    Hu, Mingxia
    Lu, Minkang
    ASIA-PACIFIC JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL STUDIES, 2022,
  • [9] Does Availability of Audit Partners Affect Audit Quality? Evidence From China
    Lo, Agnes W. Y.
    Lin, Kenny Z.
    Wong, Raymond M. K.
    JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING AUDITING AND FINANCE, 2022, 37 (02): : 407 - 439
  • [10] Market Competition, Audit Fee Stickiness, and Audit Quality: Evidence from China
    Chang, Hsihui
    Guo, Yingwen
    Mo, Phyllis Lai Lan
    AUDITING-A JOURNAL OF PRACTICE & THEORY, 2019, 38 (02): : 79 - 99