University student and instructor experiences with HyFlex learning: A scoping review

被引:0
|
作者
Cumming, Therese M. [1 ,2 ]
Han, Chen [1 ]
Gilanyi, Lisa [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ New South Wales UNSW, Sch Educ, Sydney, Australia
[2] UNSW Disabil Innovat Inst, Sydney, Australia
来源
关键词
HyFlex; University; Instructor experiences; Student experiences; Scoping review; GRADUATE-STUDENTS; COLLEGE-STUDENTS; ACHIEVEMENT; EMOTIONS;
D O I
10.1016/j.caeo.2024.100229
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
The global pandemic precipitated the movement of higher education course delivery from face-to-face to teaching online. During the post-pandemic period, some universities adopted the HyFlex model, which involves teaching students on-campus and online simultaneously. Widespread use of this model is in its infancy, therefore little is known about the experiences of university students and instructors using HyFlex mode. This knowledge is essential to the consideration of whether to continue, modify, or cease this form of course delivery. Therefore, the aim of this scoping review was to fill this gap in the literature by exploring the experiences of university instructors and students with the HyFlex model via a scoping review that followed Arksey and O'Malley's scoping review framework. A thematic analysis approach was used to analyse the data from each study reviewed. Four key themes emerged from the analysis: (a) learning satisfaction, (b) benefits of the HyFlex mode, (c) barriers and challenges related to the HyFlex mode, and (d) external factors that influence the quality of teaching and learning in the HyFlex mode. Each of these is discussed in detail and implications for future practice and further research directions are considered. The review also uncovered that there is a dearth of studies that included the voice of instructors, hence highlighting an underresearched area regarding the HyFlex mode of instruction.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Hyflex delivery mode in a postgraduate course: instructor and student perspectives
    Therese M. Cumming
    Lisa Gilanyi
    Chen Han
    Discover Education, 3 (1):
  • [2] Multiple roles of student and instructor in university teaching and learning processes
    Brady, Malcolm P.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT EDUCATION, 2013, 11 (02): : 93 - 106
  • [3] Student and Instructor Experiences in the Inverted Classroom
    Herold, Michael J.
    Lynch, Thomas D.
    Ramnath, Rajiv
    Ramanathan, Jayashree
    2012 FRONTIERS IN EDUCATION CONFERENCE (FIE), 2012,
  • [4] Student carer experiences of higher education and support: a scoping review
    Runacres, J.
    Herron, D.
    Buckless, K.
    Worrall, S.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INCLUSIVE EDUCATION, 2024, 28 (07) : 1275 - 1292
  • [5] Discontinuities in university student experiences of learning through discussions
    Ellis, RA
    Calvo, RA
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY, 2006, 37 (01) : 55 - 68
  • [6] Student perceptions on the benefits of Flipgrid in a HyFlex learning environment
    Keiper, Margaret C.
    White, Amanda
    Carlson, Cameron D.
    Lupinek, Joshua M.
    JOURNAL OF EDUCATION FOR BUSINESS, 2021, 96 (06) : 343 - 351
  • [7] The Role of Instructor Accent on Student Learning & Instructor Evaluation in a Digital Learning Environment
    Vinovskis, Carissa
    Lee, Lisa
    FASEB JOURNAL, 2018, 32 (01):
  • [8] Instructor Influences on Student Learning at NOLS
    Schumann, Scott A.
    Paisley, Karen
    Sibthorp, Jim
    Gookin, John
    JOURNAL OF OUTDOOR RECREATION EDUCATION AND LEADERSHIP, 2009, 1 (01): : 15 - 37
  • [9] Student Experiences of Emergency Remote Teaching: Impacts of Instructor Practice on Student Learning, Engagement, and Well-Being
    Petillion, Riley J.
    McNeil, W. Stephen
    JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL EDUCATION, 2020, 97 (09) : 2486 - 2493
  • [10] Disentangling the Impact of Instructor Mindset and Demeanor on Student Experiences
    White, Makita M.
    Olson, Samantha J.
    Canning, Elizabeth A.
    MOTIVATION SCIENCE, 2024, 10 (01) : 83 - 87